Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.
It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.
Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.
Are you really this stupid, or just troll a lot online.
I am smart enough to know that IUI and IVF are two completely different procedures. So there’s that.
Why do you want to know exactly which artificial tube a guy's sperm was put through, you freak?
Because fertilizing an egg outside the body is completely different from fertilizing one inside the body. You freak.
Are you going to treat both of them the same morally, or is one going to be treated differently, you silly pedant?
If you think taking a pipette and inserting sperm into a woman’s uterus is no different than giving her drugs to stimulate the ovaries, putting her under and harvesting the eggs when they’re ready, injecting the egg with sperm in a lab, waiting until they divide enough to be implanted, choosing the best ones, freezing the rest, and then going back in and implanting the embryo in the woman’s uterus, then there is literally no rational conversation to be had here. None.
Yeah, so again, are you going to treat the fertilized products of these conceptions the same, or ... ?
They’re both babies. I don’t see your point. Are the republicans trying to ban IUI specifically?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.
It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.
Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.
Are you really this stupid, or just troll a lot online.
I am smart enough to know that IUI and IVF are two completely different procedures. So there’s that.
Why do you want to know exactly which artificial tube a guy's sperm was put through, you freak?
Because fertilizing an egg outside the body is completely different from fertilizing one inside the body. You freak.
Are you going to treat both of them the same morally, or is one going to be treated differently, you silly pedant?
Pedant? You are clearly scientifically illiterate if you think I’m being pedantic pointing out the differences. The only way they are similar is they result in a baby. Other than that, two extremely different procedures.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.
It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.
Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.
Are you really this stupid, or just troll a lot online.
I am smart enough to know that IUI and IVF are two completely different procedures. So there’s that.
Why do you want to know exactly which artificial tube a guy's sperm was put through, you freak?
Because fertilizing an egg outside the body is completely different from fertilizing one inside the body. You freak.
Are you going to treat both of them the same morally, or is one going to be treated differently, you silly pedant?
If you think taking a pipette and inserting sperm into a woman’s uterus is no different than giving her drugs to stimulate the ovaries, putting her under and harvesting the eggs when they’re ready, injecting the egg with sperm in a lab, waiting until they divide enough to be implanted, choosing the best ones, freezing the rest, and then going back in and implanting the embryo in the woman’s uterus, then there is literally no rational conversation to be had here. None.
Yeah, so again, are you going to treat the fertilized products of these conceptions the same, or ... ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.
It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.
Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.
Are you really this stupid, or just troll a lot online.
I am smart enough to know that IUI and IVF are two completely different procedures. So there’s that.
Why do you want to know exactly which artificial tube a guy's sperm was put through, you freak?
Because fertilizing an egg outside the body is completely different from fertilizing one inside the body. You freak.
Are you going to treat both of them the same morally, or is one going to be treated differently, you silly pedant?
Anonymous wrote:It is ridiculous to think that being a high school sports coach prepares in any way to serve as a VP.
Lately I've been watching some political shows like "Madam Secretary ". It is striking that in real life we can't expect even remotely the level of competence exhibited by those characters. Sadly, the show writers would make a better ticket than the current shameful offering.
Anonymous wrote:It is ridiculous to think that being a high school sports coach prepares in any way to serve as a VP.
Lately I've been watching some political shows like "Madam Secretary ". It is striking that in real life we can't expect even remotely the level of competence exhibited by those characters. Sadly, the show writers would make a better ticket than the current shameful offering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.
It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.
Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.
Are you really this stupid, or just troll a lot online.
I am smart enough to know that IUI and IVF are two completely different procedures. So there’s that.
Why do you want to know exactly which artificial tube a guy's sperm was put through, you freak?
Because fertilizing an egg outside the body is completely different from fertilizing one inside the body. You freak.
Are you going to treat both of them the same morally, or is one going to be treated differently, you silly pedant?
If you think taking a pipette and inserting sperm into a woman’s uterus is no different than giving her drugs to stimulate the ovaries, putting her under and harvesting the eggs when they’re ready, injecting the egg with sperm in a lab, waiting until they divide enough to be implanted, choosing the best ones, freezing the rest, and then going back in and implanting the embryo in the woman’s uterus, then there is literally no rational conversation to be had here. None.
Anonymous wrote:It is ridiculous to think that being a high school sports coach prepares in any way to serve as a VP.
Lately I've been watching some political shows like "Madam Secretary ". It is striking that in real life we can't expect even remotely the level of competence exhibited by those characters. Sadly, the show writers would make a better ticket than the current shameful offering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.
It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.
Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.
Are you really this stupid, or just troll a lot online.
I am smart enough to know that IUI and IVF are two completely different procedures. So there’s that.
Congratulations. You are part of the .05% of people outside of fertility doctors to know this.
Anonymous wrote:It is ridiculous to think that being a high school sports coach prepares in any way to serve as a VP.
Lately I've been watching some political shows like "Madam Secretary ". It is striking that in real life we can't expect even remotely the level of competence exhibited by those characters. Sadly, the show writers would make a better ticket than the current shameful offering.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.
It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.
Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.
Are you really this stupid, or just troll a lot online.
I am smart enough to know that IUI and IVF are two completely different procedures. So there’s that.
Why do you want to know exactly which artificial tube a guy's sperm was put through, you freak?
Because fertilizing an egg outside the body is completely different from fertilizing one inside the body. You freak.
Are you going to treat both of them the same morally, or is one going to be treated differently, you silly pedant?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.
It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.
Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.
Are you really this stupid, or just troll a lot online.
I am smart enough to know that IUI and IVF are two completely different procedures. So there’s that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.
It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.
Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.
Are you really this stupid, or just troll a lot online.
I am smart enough to know that IUI and IVF are two completely different procedures. So there’s that.
Why do you want to know exactly which artificial tube a guy's sperm was put through, you freak?
Because fertilizing an egg outside the body is completely different from fertilizing one inside the body. You freak.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed, but I read that even though he said he wouldn’t have a family if there was no IVF, they didn’t actually conceive using IVF - they used IUI. Totally different.
It’s been discussed and it’s a stupid thing to nit pick over. Most people don’t know what IUI is and unless you have zero social skills, you’re not going to explain it every time you discuss it.
Of course if it’s your candidate it’s stupid to nit pick over. The guy lied. He didn’t use IVF, but said he did to score political points. Own it.
Are you really this stupid, or just troll a lot online.
I am smart enough to know that IUI and IVF are two completely different procedures. So there’s that.