Anonymous
08/02/2023 18:24
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Oops. I thought you pro-lifers were ready to step in to support these parents. I can't even. It's just sad when they're principles blow up in their faces.
Anonymous
08/02/2023 18:13
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous
08/01/2023 19:41
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would one of the faux-moderate “send it to the states!” posters explain why the Republican Party doesn’t want states voting on this issue?
https://www.cleveland.com/news/2023/07/lawsuit-asks-ohio-supreme-court-to-block-abortion-rights-measure-from-november-ballot.html
It’s weird… if it’s a StAtEs RiGhTs issue, you’d think they’d want people to weigh in at the state level.
And yet crickets from our forums forced-birthers.
It’s almost like controlling women *was* the point!
x1000. The whole argument at the Supreme Court level was that this was a state issue. The people of the states are speaking. Shouldn’t this be celebrated by all?
No, in Ohio they have to hold an illegal August special election to make sure that you need 60% of the people in the state to speak, not just 50% +1.
Anonymous
08/01/2023 19:11
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would one of the faux-moderate “send it to the states!” posters explain why the Republican Party doesn’t want states voting on this issue?
https://www.cleveland.com/news/2023/07/lawsuit-asks-ohio-supreme-court-to-block-abortion-rights-measure-from-november-ballot.html
It’s weird… if it’s a StAtEs RiGhTs issue, you’d think they’d want people to weigh in at the state level.
And yet crickets from our forums forced-birthers.
It’s almost like controlling women *was* the point!
x1000. The whole argument at the Supreme Court level was that this was a state issue. The people of the states are speaking. Shouldn’t this be celebrated by all?
Anonymous
08/01/2023 17:24
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would one of the faux-moderate “send it to the states!” posters explain why the Republican Party doesn’t want states voting on this issue?
https://www.cleveland.com/news/2023/07/lawsuit-asks-ohio-supreme-court-to-block-abortion-rights-measure-from-november-ballot.html
It’s weird… if it’s a StAtEs RiGhTs issue, you’d think they’d want people to weigh in at the state level.
And yet crickets from our forums forced-birthers.
It’s almost like controlling women *was* the point!
Anonymous
08/01/2023 12:47
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Would one of the faux-moderate “send it to the states!” posters explain why the Republican Party doesn’t want states voting on this issue?
https://www.cleveland.com/news/2023/07/lawsuit-asks-ohio-supreme-court-to-block-abortion-rights-measure-from-november-ballot.html
It’s weird… if it’s a StAtEs RiGhTs issue, you’d think they’d want people to weigh in at the state level.
Anonymous
08/01/2023 12:39
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Would one of the faux-moderate “send it to the states!” posters explain why the Republican Party doesn’t want states voting on this issue?
https://www.cleveland.com/news/2023/07/lawsuit-asks-ohio-supreme-court-to-block-abortion-rights-measure-from-november-ballot.html
https://www.cleveland.com/news/2023/07/lawsuit-asks-ohio-supreme-court-to-block-abortion-rights-measure-from-november-ballot.html
Anonymous
07/30/2023 11:49
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:You should all teach your daughters to keep their legs closed if they don’t want a child. Teach your kids there are consequences for engaging is adult behavior.
It’s quite telling that you’re only mentioning “daughters” — and not sons. Teach your sons to keep their pants zipped. Hmmm. What “consequences “ for the sons would be equivalent to forced pregnancy, birth, and parenthood? I can think of a few, in addition to the parenthood parts. None of these things would be in the best interests of the children though.
Anonymous
07/30/2023 11:36
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another horrible consequence of GOP abortion policies. FFS get out of our personal lives.
Lifesaving HIV program faces a new threat: U.S. abortion politics.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2023/07/29/pepfar-aids-hiv-abortion-congress/
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, better known as PEPFAR, has been abruptly bogged down in a domestic political fight, with Republicans citing allegations that the program’s funding is being used to indirectly support abortions — claims that health advocates, Democrats and PEPFAR officials say are baseless. As a result, lawmakers have spent months wrangling over whether Congress will reauthorize the program for five years, for one year or not at all — a decision that experts warn has both practical and symbolic consequences.
Republicans are garbage, Heritage and their friends are garbage. There is literally no gutter, no low to which they will not stoop. People and the media need treating them like they have anything reasonable to say. The headlines need to start getting more accurate here.
“Republicans to kill African children in effort to push stateside anti-abortion agenda”
“Heritage Foundation lies, slanders HIV clinics in Africa in cynical attempt to cut off funds”
“Pro-life politicians seek to end lifesaving foreign aid program over unfounded allegations, lies”
That last one needs to be corrected to “anti-life politicians.”
Anti-abortionists are in no way pro-life and do not deserve that moniker.
Anonymous
07/30/2023 09:27
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
they don't even realize that many PP locations can go weeks without performing one abortion. out of 8million+ procedures, only 4% are abortions.
That’s my point. They don’t care about learning the facts, or if they do they’re upset that women are getting healthcare at all.
These Beta males think women are their property. They are very concerned no one would breed with their disgusting, pasty, delusional asses unless they are forced to.
There is literally no one more disgusting to me than a so-called “pro life” male. Ladies, wake up, they aren’t even worth a pity lay.
Anonymous
07/30/2023 09:24
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Another horrible consequence of GOP abortion policies. FFS get out of our personal lives.
Lifesaving HIV program faces a new threat: U.S. abortion politics.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2023/07/29/pepfar-aids-hiv-abortion-congress/
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, better known as PEPFAR, has been abruptly bogged down in a domestic political fight, with Republicans citing allegations that the program’s funding is being used to indirectly support abortions — claims that health advocates, Democrats and PEPFAR officials say are baseless. As a result, lawmakers have spent months wrangling over whether Congress will reauthorize the program for five years, for one year or not at all — a decision that experts warn has both practical and symbolic consequences.
Republicans are garbage, Heritage and their friends are garbage. There is literally no gutter, no low to which they will not stoop. People and the media need treating them like they have anything reasonable to say. The headlines need to start getting more accurate here.
“Republicans to kill African children in effort to push stateside anti-abortion agenda”
“Heritage Foundation lies, slanders HIV clinics in Africa in cynical attempt to cut off funds”
“Pro-life politicians seek to end lifesaving foreign aid program over unfounded allegations, lies”
Anonymous
07/30/2023 07:54
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Another horrible consequence of GOP abortion policies. FFS get out of our personal lives.
Lifesaving HIV program faces a new threat: U.S. abortion politics.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2023/07/29/pepfar-aids-hiv-abortion-congress/
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, better known as PEPFAR, has been abruptly bogged down in a domestic political fight, with Republicans citing allegations that the program’s funding is being used to indirectly support abortions — claims that health advocates, Democrats and PEPFAR officials say are baseless. As a result, lawmakers have spent months wrangling over whether Congress will reauthorize the program for five years, for one year or not at all — a decision that experts warn has both practical and symbolic consequences.
Lifesaving HIV program faces a new threat: U.S. abortion politics.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2023/07/29/pepfar-aids-hiv-abortion-congress/
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, better known as PEPFAR, has been abruptly bogged down in a domestic political fight, with Republicans citing allegations that the program’s funding is being used to indirectly support abortions — claims that health advocates, Democrats and PEPFAR officials say are baseless. As a result, lawmakers have spent months wrangling over whether Congress will reauthorize the program for five years, for one year or not at all — a decision that experts warn has both practical and symbolic consequences.
Anonymous
07/25/2023 08:44
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
they don't even realize that many PP locations can go weeks without performing one abortion. out of 8million+ procedures, only 4% are abortions.
That’s my point. They don’t care about learning the facts, or if they do they’re upset that women are getting healthcare at all.
Anonymous
07/24/2023 23:39
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
they don't even realize that many PP locations can go weeks without performing one abortion. out of 8million+ procedures, only 4% are abortions.