Anonymous
06/15/2026 14:05
Subject: War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BREAKING: Iran says the US has agreed to pay $300 billion in reconstruction funds directly to Iran as part of the deal Pakistan announced, alongside the release of $24 billion in frozen funds with $12 billion released before negotiations even start, per
Mehr News. This directly contradicts Trump's & Vance's claim
that no funds will be transferred to Iran at all. If Trump denies this is true, there never was a deal. If Trump confirms, the US has fully capitulated To Iran.
300 billion U.S. taxpayer dollars to rebuild Iran after a war of choice that nobody wanted in the first place. Amazing.
Is there a link other than Mehr News stating that the US agreed to pay Iran $300 billion in funds for reconstruction?
Even the right wing NY Post has it. https://nypost.com/2026/06/15/us-news/us-iran-already-signed-the-deal-digitally-sunday-vance-says/
There's an attempt to sugar coat it, but J.D. Vance admits it here: https://bsky.app/profile/thebulwark.com/post/3modl5yuevk2u
(Links to Bluesky which doesn’t have the whole truth) This isn’t a sugar coat. It’s called conditions
LOL, buying the tripe.
Anonymous
06/15/2026 13:21
Subject: War with Iran Part II
Oh boy, Israel has a problem because the president they finally found that was dumb enough to do this is also a president that is dumb enough to do this.
Anonymous
06/15/2026 13:21
Subject: Re:War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought this war was started because Iran was an imminent threat and close to getting a nuclear bomb. But this supposed peace still doesn’t address their nuclear capabilities at all.
I guess there is an advantage to not having a reason for starting a war.
The MOU mentions nothing about inspections confirming when Iran says that it’s not enriching uranium that its true. And also makes no mention of the Strait being free and open unless I missed something?
Those things are in the US version of the MOU. 😉
Link to this US version? Seems like a problem if there are two versions. It would indicate there is not in fact an agreement.
I guess we could consider Iran is lying. But no, not DCUM
Any rational person who has been even half-awake for the past several years would rightly assume that Trump is the one lying.
Iran NEVER lies, right?
Unlikely. But Trump ALWAYS lies, so it's usually best to wait for Iran for verification.
Anonymous
06/15/2026 13:15
Subject: Re:War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought this war was started because Iran was an imminent threat and close to getting a nuclear bomb. But this supposed peace still doesn’t address their nuclear capabilities at all.
I guess there is an advantage to not having a reason for starting a war.
The MOU mentions nothing about inspections confirming when Iran says that it’s not enriching uranium that its true. And also makes no mention of the Strait being free and open unless I missed something?
Those things are in the US version of the MOU. 😉
Link to this US version? Seems like a problem if there are two versions. It would indicate there is not in fact an agreement.
I guess we could consider Iran is lying. But no, not DCUM
Lmao…yes, surely after we’ve been lied to time and time and time again by the administration, this is SURELY the time they are telling the truth.
You guys ever get tired of getting played? Did Mexico pay for the wall yet? Doing some shopping with those tariff checks? Enjoying those low prices?
Lego video > Trump
If eggs are high, it’s because I support free range and put my money behind that. Otherwise I could have eggs for about $3.50. Same with milk when I buy it. Gas is not grossly expensive here. In Cali? Sure but that’s because they are taxed out the wazoo for it. You KNOW Iran lies but choose to believe them because of TDS
You are a child. Instead of 6-7 you just babble on about TDS. How you can pretend to be a functioning adult and yet at the same time try to justify support for Pedo Grandpa is a sad joke.
I’d feel sad for you if it didn’t affect the country as a whole.
Anonymous
06/15/2026 13:06
Subject: Re:War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought this war was started because Iran was an imminent threat and close to getting a nuclear bomb. But this supposed peace still doesn’t address their nuclear capabilities at all.
I guess there is an advantage to not having a reason for starting a war.
The MOU mentions nothing about inspections confirming when Iran says that it’s not enriching uranium that its true. And also makes no mention of the Strait being free and open unless I missed something?
Those things are in the US version of the MOU. 😉
Link to this US version? Seems like a problem if there are two versions. It would indicate there is not in fact an agreement.
I guess we could consider Iran is lying. But no, not DCUM
If you think Iran is lying then... there is no deal. You can't have it both ways.
But Trump has repeatedly and openly lied so at this point you're just Charlie Brown kicking that football every single time.
Anonymous
06/15/2026 13:04
Subject: Re:War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought this war was started because Iran was an imminent threat and close to getting a nuclear bomb. But this supposed peace still doesn’t address their nuclear capabilities at all.
I guess there is an advantage to not having a reason for starting a war.
The MOU mentions nothing about inspections confirming when Iran says that it’s not enriching uranium that its true. And also makes no mention of the Strait being free and open unless I missed something?
Those things are in the US version of the MOU. 😉
Link to this US version? Seems like a problem if there are two versions. It would indicate there is not in fact an agreement.
I guess we could consider Iran is lying. But no, not DCUM
Any rational person who has been even half-awake for the past several years would rightly assume that Trump is the one lying.
Iran NEVER lies, right?
Unlikely. But Trump ALWAYS lies, so it's usually best to wait for Iran for verification.
+1 Why don’t they just officially release the MOU?
Anonymous
06/15/2026 13:01
Subject: Re:War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought this war was started because Iran was an imminent threat and close to getting a nuclear bomb. But this supposed peace still doesn’t address their nuclear capabilities at all.
I guess there is an advantage to not having a reason for starting a war.
The MOU mentions nothing about inspections confirming when Iran says that it’s not enriching uranium that its true. And also makes no mention of the Strait being free and open unless I missed something?
Those things are in the US version of the MOU. 😉
Link to this US version? Seems like a problem if there are two versions. It would indicate there is not in fact an agreement.
I guess we could consider Iran is lying. But no, not DCUM
Any rational person who has been even half-awake for the past several years would rightly assume that Trump is the one lying.
Iran NEVER lies, right?
Unlikely. But Trump ALWAYS lies, so it's usually best to wait for Iran for verification.
Anonymous
06/15/2026 12:58
Subject: Re:War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought this war was started because Iran was an imminent threat and close to getting a nuclear bomb. But this supposed peace still doesn’t address their nuclear capabilities at all.
I guess there is an advantage to not having a reason for starting a war.
The MOU mentions nothing about inspections confirming when Iran says that it’s not enriching uranium that its true. And also makes no mention of the Strait being free and open unless I missed something?
Those things are in the US version of the MOU. 😉
Link to this US version? Seems like a problem if there are two versions. It would indicate there is not in fact an agreement.
I guess we could consider Iran is lying. But no, not DCUM
Lmao…yes, surely after we’ve been lied to time and time and time again by the administration, this is SURELY the time they are telling the truth.
You guys ever get tired of getting played? Did Mexico pay for the wall yet? Doing some shopping with those tariff checks? Enjoying those low prices?
Lego video > Trump
If eggs are high, it’s because I support free range and put my money behind that. Otherwise I could have eggs for about $3.50. Same with milk when I buy it. Gas is not grossly expensive here. In Cali? Sure but that’s because they are taxed out the wazoo for it. You KNOW Iran lies but choose to believe them because of TDS
Anonymous
06/15/2026 12:53
Subject: Re:War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought this war was started because Iran was an imminent threat and close to getting a nuclear bomb. But this supposed peace still doesn’t address their nuclear capabilities at all.
I guess there is an advantage to not having a reason for starting a war.
The MOU mentions nothing about inspections confirming when Iran says that it’s not enriching uranium that its true. And also makes no mention of the Strait being free and open unless I missed something?
Those things are in the US version of the MOU. 😉
Link to this US version? Seems like a problem if there are two versions. It would indicate there is not in fact an agreement.
I guess we could consider Iran is lying. But no, not DCUM
Lmao…yes, surely after we’ve been lied to time and time and time again by the administration, this is SURELY the time they are telling the truth.
You guys ever get tired of getting played? Did Mexico pay for the wall yet? Doing some shopping with those tariff checks? Enjoying those low prices?
Lego video > Trump
Anonymous
06/15/2026 12:49
Subject: War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BREAKING: Iran says the US has agreed to pay $300 billion in reconstruction funds directly to Iran as part of the deal Pakistan announced, alongside the release of $24 billion in frozen funds with $12 billion released before negotiations even start, per
Mehr News. This directly contradicts Trump's & Vance's claim
that no funds will be transferred to Iran at all. If Trump denies this is true, there never was a deal. If Trump confirms, the US has fully capitulated To Iran.
300 billion U.S. taxpayer dollars to rebuild Iran after a war of choice that nobody wanted in the first place. Amazing.
Is there a link other than Mehr News stating that the US agreed to pay Iran $300 billion in funds for reconstruction?
Even the right wing NY Post has it. https://nypost.com/2026/06/15/us-news/us-iran-already-signed-the-deal-digitally-sunday-vance-says/
There's an attempt to sugar coat it, but J.D. Vance admits it here: https://bsky.app/profile/thebulwark.com/post/3modl5yuevk2u
(Links to Bluesky which doesn’t have the whole truth) This isn’t a sugar coat. It’s called conditions
Anonymous
06/15/2026 12:47
Subject: Re:War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought this war was started because Iran was an imminent threat and close to getting a nuclear bomb. But this supposed peace still doesn’t address their nuclear capabilities at all.
I guess there is an advantage to not having a reason for starting a war.
The MOU mentions nothing about inspections confirming when Iran says that it’s not enriching uranium that its true. And also makes no mention of the Strait being free and open unless I missed something?
Those things are in the US version of the MOU. 😉
Link to this US version? Seems like a problem if there are two versions. It would indicate there is not in fact an agreement.
I guess we could consider Iran is lying. But no, not DCUM
Any rational person who has been even half-awake for the past several years would rightly assume that Trump is the one lying.
Iran NEVER lies, right?
Anonymous
06/15/2026 12:46
Subject: War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BREAKING: Iran says the US has agreed to pay $300 billion in reconstruction funds directly to Iran as part of the deal Pakistan announced, alongside the release of $24 billion in frozen funds with $12 billion released before negotiations even start, per
Mehr News. This directly contradicts Trump's & Vance's claim
that no funds will be transferred to Iran at all. If Trump denies this is true, there never was a deal. If Trump confirms, the US has fully capitulated To Iran.
300 billion U.S. taxpayer dollars to rebuild Iran after a war of choice that nobody wanted in the first place. Amazing.
Is there a link other than Mehr News stating that the US agreed to pay Iran $300 billion in funds for reconstruction?
Even the right wing NY Post has it. https://nypost.com/2026/06/15/us-news/us-iran-already-signed-the-deal-digitally-sunday-vance-says/
There's an attempt to sugar coat it, but J.D. Vance admits it here: https://bsky.app/profile/thebulwark.com/post/3modl5yuevk2u
Anonymous
06/15/2026 12:46
Subject: Re:War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought this war was started because Iran was an imminent threat and close to getting a nuclear bomb. But this supposed peace still doesn’t address their nuclear capabilities at all.
I guess there is an advantage to not having a reason for starting a war.
The MOU mentions nothing about inspections confirming when Iran says that it’s not enriching uranium that its true. And also makes no mention of the Strait being free and open unless I missed something?
Those things are in the US version of the MOU. 😉
Link to this US version? Seems like a problem if there are two versions. It would indicate there is not in fact an agreement.
I guess we could consider Iran is lying. But no, not DCUM
Any rational person who has been even half-awake for the past several years would rightly assume that Trump is the one lying.
Anonymous
06/15/2026 12:45
Subject: War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:BREAKING: Iran says the US has agreed to pay $300 billion in reconstruction funds directly to Iran as part of the deal Pakistan announced, alongside the release of $24 billion in frozen funds with $12 billion released before negotiations even start, per
Mehr News. This directly contradicts Trump's & Vance's claim
that no funds will be transferred to Iran at all. If Trump denies this is true, there never was a deal. If Trump confirms, the US has fully capitulated To Iran.
300 billion U.S. taxpayer dollars to rebuild Iran after a war of choice that nobody wanted in the first place. Amazing.
Is there a link other than Mehr News stating that the US agreed to pay Iran $300 billion in funds for reconstruction?
Even the right wing NY Post has it. https://nypost.com/2026/06/15/us-news/us-iran-already-signed-the-deal-digitally-sunday-vance-says/
But wait, there’s more!
…if they meet their obligations to end their nuclear program, but that money would not come from the United States.
Anonymous
06/15/2026 12:41
Subject: Re:War with Iran Part II
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought this war was started because Iran was an imminent threat and close to getting a nuclear bomb. But this supposed peace still doesn’t address their nuclear capabilities at all.
I guess there is an advantage to not having a reason for starting a war.
The MOU mentions nothing about inspections confirming when Iran says that it’s not enriching uranium that its true. And also makes no mention of the Strait being free and open unless I missed something?
Those things are in the US version of the MOU. 😉
Link to this US version? Seems like a problem if there are two versions. It would indicate there is not in fact an agreement.
I guess we could consider Iran is lying. But no, not DCUM