Anonymous wrote:Heavily influenced by behind the wall negotiations and pressures by parents (mcl) Really sucky process.
I no don’t think so.
I can’t speak to the 2007/2008/2009 girls but here is what we are seeing for the younger groups:
2010s — hard to know but the union team is exceptional for that age/year. Hopefully this team stays strong and starters don’t drift to other clubs.
For the 2011s girls it seemed to be entirely skills/position/player based. Quotas for each team were not part of the equation. There may be more past union players on the final list but it looks like they moved fairly far into both club’s current rosters to build this team. At least three high quality union players are going elsewhere and some of them were clear starters in this year’s team. Only one external player know to have received an offer.
Feels like 2012s were a complete selection process from scratch and very much determined at the ID sessions. Hard to make these kinds of decisions with so many available and skilled young players.