Anonymous
07/20/2023 03:48
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
That is some ignorant over simplistic nonsense. You sound clueless about all the things that can go wrong in human reproduction. Worry about your own reproductive business and stay far away from me and my daughters with your clueless judgements.
I work in healthcare and I’m very educated about reproductive health. A fetus is a separate body. I guess your body tricks you to tell you lies to cope with murdering a baby.[/quote
You are very educated about reproductive health and yet you "guess" that your body "tricks" you.
Do you have a link for this "guess" about body "tricking"?? I hope I don't get you if I go to the doctor for ANY reason.
Anonymous
07/20/2023 03:48
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This isn’t okay. I said we need exceptions. I believe in eliminating abortions, but I don’t support abortion bans because they do not have exceptions.
If we can’t get rid of abortion, the bill needs to be on the person. Taxpayers should not have to fund murder. We also need to limit abortion unless medically necessary until the first trimester.
I’m just a woman who thinks people need to take more accountability before the act instead of after the act. If opposing murder of an innocent being makes me a misogynist, I’m fine with that.
I watched a film of how abortion is performed and it changed me into a pro-lifer. Seeing a baby ripped limb limb and the skull crushed and sucked out is horrifying. If anyone is okay with this, they’re very sick people and should not be able to breed.
Taxpayers have not funded abortions since the Hyde Amendment was adopted decades ago.
And it isn't murder when the fetus isn't viable.
None of this is up to you. It is between the patient and doctor.
Since 2021, 16 states use state funds to pay for elective abortions.
Anonymous
07/20/2023 03:45
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.
So what’s the “good” you’re referencing? The post above you is about a woman who was forced to give birth to a baby without a skull and watch it die. She vomited talking about it in court. That’s “good”?
Nope. I’m happy we are having abortions restricted but I said we need exceptions in cases of SA/incest, miscarriages, and when it is a direct issue with the moms health.
And the baby born without a skull wasn’t a case of any of those. So you’re just a sick person.
I’m for abortions in these scenarios. I’m not for abortions of healthy babies because it’s an inconvenience. You all act like it’s impossible to prevent pregnancy. Maybe you’re all just that dumb.
Anonymous
07/20/2023 03:42
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.
So...you want "irresponsible" women who are stupid and reckless to be forced to become mothers to unwanted babies? Is that what you are saying? Deny them abortions because they are irresponsibly and acted stupidly and recklessly, so they will become....just what kind of mothers do you think you are creating through your punishment?
So your answer is to just kill the baby? That’s like saying low-income or foster kids people aren’t worthy of life because they don’t live a great life.
There is no “ force”. Engaging in unprotected sex knowing it can result in a child is reckless. You don’t kill a child you recklessly created because it’s an inconvenience. How about be an adult and take accountability for your mistakes and actions? How about practice safe sex or abstain? It’s like that concept is brand new to you people.
Tell it to the rapists and those who perform incestuous acts on women.
Rape makes up less than 1% abortions. Most abortions are out of convenience. I said we need to make exception for rape and incest.
Instead of killing an innocent human life, why don’t you teach yourself and your daughters how to take accountability and have responsible sex of abstain until they can provide for a baby?
Getting pregnant is preventable. Learn to take accountability.
Anonymous
07/20/2023 03:39
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.
Sounds like you are way too involved in other people's private business. You take care of your body and others will do the same
A fetus isn’t your body. It’s a separate human body. When you have an abortion, you don’t kill yourself. It was never your body. You don’t want to give have a baby? Then abstain or use protection
If you don't want an abortion, don't get one. You don't have the right to tell others how to manage their bodies or healthcare.
Killing an innocent life that you’ve could’ve prevented creating by not being irresponsible is not healthcare.
Anonymous
07/20/2023 03:37
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.
Sounds like you are way too involved in other people's private business. You take care of your body and others will do the same
A fetus isn’t your body. It’s a separate human body. When you have an abortion, you don’t kill yourself. It was never your body. You don’t want to give have a baby? Then abstain or use protection
That is some ignorant over simplistic nonsense. You sound clueless about all the things that can go wrong in human reproduction. Worry about your own reproductive business and stay far away from me and my daughters with your clueless judgements.
I work in healthcare and I’m very educated about reproductive health. A fetus is a separate body. I guess your body tricks you to tell you lies to cope with murdering a baby.
Anonymous
07/20/2023 02:06
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:[…]
I watched a film of how abortion is performed and it changed me into a pro-lifer. Seeing a baby ripped limb limb and the skull crushed and sucked out is horrifying. If anyone is okay with this, they’re very sick people and should not be able to breed.
I knew it! You are 13!
Anonymous
07/20/2023 02:05
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.
Sounds like you are way too involved in other people's private business. You take care of your body and others will do the same
A fetus isn’t your body. It’s a separate human body. When you have an abortion, you don’t kill yourself. It was never your body. You don’t want to give have a baby? Then abstain or use protection
As you’re 13 and very passionate, let me tell you a few shocking facts about pregnancy, labor and delivery when it’s “not your body.”
Also are you fact resistant? Many of the abortions we’ve been talking about are from wanted pregnancies that, turns out, weren’t safe or sustainable. It’s hard to abstain or “use protection” (quite the little Victorian, aren’t you) when you’re trying to get pregnant and have a child.
Anonymous
07/20/2023 01:59
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.
So what’s the “good” you’re referencing? The post above you is about a woman who was forced to give birth to a baby without a skull and watch it die. She vomited talking about it in court. That’s “good”?
Nope. I’m happy we are having abortions restricted but I said we need exceptions in cases of SA/incest, miscarriages, and when it is a direct issue with the moms health.
And the baby born without a skull wasn’t a case of any of those. So you’re just a sick person.
Anonymous
07/20/2023 00:28
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
This isn’t okay. I said we need exceptions. I believe in eliminating abortions, but I don’t support abortion bans because they do not have exceptions.
If we can’t get rid of abortion, the bill needs to be on the person. Taxpayers should not have to fund murder. We also need to limit abortion unless medically necessary until the first trimester.
I’m just a woman who thinks people need to take more accountability before the act instead of after the act. If opposing murder of an innocent being makes me a misogynist, I’m fine with that.
I watched a film of how abortion is performed and it changed me into a pro-lifer. Seeing a baby ripped limb limb and the skull crushed and sucked out is horrifying. If anyone is okay with this, they’re very sick people and should not be able to breed.
All you are accomplishing is the erosion of modern women's healthcare system present in many states. You are not going to force people to give birth. You are not going to turn 25 percent of the women of this nation into murderous criminals because of your self righteous nonsense.
You need to work on accepting that other people's reproductive lives are not of your concern. No one can tell you what to do and you can't tell another what to do.
Anonymous
07/20/2023 00:19
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
This isn’t okay. I said we need exceptions. I believe in eliminating abortions, but I don’t support abortion bans because they do not have exceptions.
If we can’t get rid of abortion, the bill needs to be on the person. Taxpayers should not have to fund murder. We also need to limit abortion unless medically necessary until the first trimester.
I’m just a woman who thinks people need to take more accountability before the act instead of after the act. If opposing murder of an innocent being makes me a misogynist, I’m fine with that.
I watched a film of how abortion is performed and it changed me into a pro-lifer. Seeing a baby ripped limb limb and the skull crushed and sucked out is horrifying. If anyone is okay with this, they’re very sick people and should not be able to breed.
Taxpayers have not funded abortions since the Hyde Amendment was adopted decades ago.
And it isn't murder when the fetus isn't viable.
None of this is up to you. It is between the patient and doctor.
Anonymous
07/20/2023 00:18
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.
So...you want "irresponsible" women who are stupid and reckless to be forced to become mothers to unwanted babies? Is that what you are saying? Deny them abortions because they are irresponsibly and acted stupidly and recklessly, so they will become....just what kind of mothers do you think you are creating through your punishment?
So your answer is to just kill the baby? That’s like saying low-income or foster kids people aren’t worthy of life because they don’t live a great life.
There is no “ force”. Engaging in unprotected sex knowing it can result in a child is reckless. You don’t kill a child you recklessly created because it’s an inconvenience. How about be an adult and take accountability for your mistakes and actions? How about practice safe sex or abstain? It’s like that concept is brand new to you people.
Tell it to the rapists and those who perform incestuous acts on women.
Anonymous
07/20/2023 00:17
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.
Sounds like you are way too involved in other people's private business. You take care of your body and others will do the same
A fetus isn’t your body. It’s a separate human body. When you have an abortion, you don’t kill yourself. It was never your body. You don’t want to give have a baby? Then abstain or use protection
If you don't want an abortion, don't get one. You don't have the right to tell others how to manage their bodies or healthcare.
Anonymous
07/20/2023 00:14
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.
Sounds like you are way too involved in other people's private business. You take care of your body and others will do the same
A fetus isn’t your body. It’s a separate human body. When you have an abortion, you don’t kill yourself. It was never your body. You don’t want to give have a baby? Then abstain or use protection
That is some ignorant over simplistic nonsense. You sound clueless about all the things that can go wrong in human reproduction. Worry about your own reproductive business and stay far away from me and my daughters with your clueless judgements.
Anonymous
07/20/2023 00:07
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
This isn’t okay. I said we need exceptions. I believe in eliminating abortions, but I don’t support abortion bans because they do not have exceptions.
If we can’t get rid of abortion, the bill needs to be on the person. Taxpayers should not have to fund murder. We also need to limit abortion unless medically necessary until the first trimester.
I’m just a woman who thinks people need to take more accountability before the act instead of after the act. If opposing murder of an innocent being makes me a misogynist, I’m fine with that.
I watched a film of how abortion is performed and it changed me into a pro-lifer. Seeing a baby ripped limb limb and the skull crushed and sucked out is horrifying. If anyone is okay with this, they’re very sick people and should not be able to breed.