Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have long said that Riverside kids and parents are some of te worst. Started two years ago when they lost to Freedom, increased last when Indy was a threat, increased more when they lost to Indy, big slip this year when they lost to SB.

Get this they are celebrating a win over Lightridge, who was recently a class 4 team and started operations a few years back. Old riverside would have won 21-0, today not so much

Hard to blame all parents when it is really only Johhny Appleseed aka Joe who posts here.

Naw not one guy- listen to the stream, dads who don’t know the rules, moms who squawk like a bunch of birds, complaints after every check, mental breakdown if they get a flag, it’s embarrassment.
I have a ton of respect for the coach and what he has done. The current crop of parents and kids are living off the past and have done nothing today.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have long said that Riverside kids and parents are some of te worst. Started two years ago when they lost to Freedom, increased last when Indy was a threat, increased more when they lost to Indy, big slip this year when they lost to SB.

Get this they are celebrating a win over Lightridge, who was recently a class 4 team and started operations a few years back. Old riverside would have won 21-0, today not so much

Hard to blame all parents when it is really only Johhny Appleseed aka Joe who posts here.

Anonymous wrote:I have long said that Riverside kids and parents are some of te worst. Started two years ago when they lost to Freedom, increased last when Indy was a threat, increased more when they lost to Indy, big slip this year when they lost to SB.

Get this they are celebrating a win over Lightridge, who was recently a class 4 team and started operations a few years back. Old riverside would have won 21-0, today not so much

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Riverside 13-2 over Lightridge. Never close.

Man I am gonna say that you’re either a Riverside kid/ parent or just didn’t watch the game. I am not with either team, didn’t think LR had a real shot, but you’re just off
“Never close”?
What was the half time score?
3-1 Riverside.

I would say that it was close for at least 1/3 the game.

I was at the game, and it was never close, as Riverside dominates possession and if Lightridge or any other team can't possess the ball then they can't score, or even have the opportunity to score.

I don’t know, if it was 3-1 at half, a two goal game at half seems close for at least 1/2 the game.

I don’t see what these two are arguing about, seem clear to me.

13-2

Continue to post the final score as if that nullifies the 2 goal difference at the half. You can keep making the same useless point but it doesn't get you any closer to a valid argument.

You are right! Lightridge is amazing, what a great team. They SHOULD had killed Riverside. They must had been down 5-7 starters. I wont post the final score of 13-2 again.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Riverside 13-2 over Lightridge. Never close.

Man I am gonna say that you’re either a Riverside kid/ parent or just didn’t watch the game. I am not with either team, didn’t think LR had a real shot, but you’re just off
“Never close”?
What was the half time score?
3-1 Riverside.

I would say that it was close for at least 1/3 the game.

I was at the game, and it was never close, as Riverside dominates possession and if Lightridge or any other team can't possess the ball then they can't score, or even have the opportunity to score.

I don’t know, if it was 3-1 at half, a two goal game at half seems close for at least 1/2 the game.

I don’t see what these two are arguing about, seem clear to me.

13-2

Continue to post the final score as if that nullifies the 2 goal difference at the half. You can keep making the same useless point but it doesn't get you any closer to a valid argument.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Riverside 13-2 over Lightridge. Never close.

Man I am gonna say that you’re either a Riverside kid/ parent or just didn’t watch the game. I am not with either team, didn’t think LR had a real shot, but you’re just off
“Never close”?
What was the half time score?
3-1 Riverside.

I would say that it was close for at least 1/3 the game.

I was at the game, and it was never close, as Riverside dominates possession and if Lightridge or any other team can't possess the ball then they can't score, or even have the opportunity to score.

I don’t know, if it was 3-1 at half, a two goal game at half seems close for at least 1/2 the game.

I don’t see what these two are arguing about, seem clear to me.

13-2

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Riverside 13-2 over Lightridge. Never close.

Man I am gonna say that you’re either a Riverside kid/ parent or just didn’t watch the game. I am not with either team, didn’t think LR had a real shot, but you’re just off
“Never close”?
What was the half time score?
3-1 Riverside.

I would say that it was close for at least 1/3 the game.

I was at the game, and it was never close, as Riverside dominates possession and if Lightridge or any other team can't possess the ball then they can't score, or even have the opportunity to score.

I don’t know, if it was 3-1 at half, a two goal game at half seems close for at least 1/2 the game.

I don’t see what these two are arguing about, seem clear to me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Riverside 13-2 over Lightridge. Never close.

Man I am gonna say that you’re either a Riverside kid/ parent or just didn’t watch the game. I am not with either team, didn’t think LR had a real shot, but you’re just off
“Never close”?
What was the half time score?
3-1 Riverside.

I would say that it was close for at least 1/3 the game.

I was at the game, and it was never close, as Riverside dominates possession and if Lightridge or any other team can't possess the ball then they can't score, or even have the opportunity to score.

I don’t know, if it was 3-1 at half, a two goal game at half seems close for at least 1/2 the game.

I don’t see what these two are arguing about, seem clear to me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Riverside 13-2 over Lightridge. Never close.

Man I am gonna say that you’re either a Riverside kid/ parent or just didn’t watch the game. I am not with either team, didn’t think LR had a real shot, but you’re just off
“Never close”?
What was the half time score?
3-1 Riverside.

I would say that it was close for at least 1/3 the game.

I was at the game, and it was never close, as Riverside dominates possession and if Lightridge or any other team can't possess the ball then they can't score, or even have the opportunity to score.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Riverside 13-2 over Lightridge. Never close.

Man I am gonna say that you’re either a Riverside kid/ parent or just didn’t watch the game. I am not with either team, didn’t think LR had a real shot, but you’re just off
“Never close”?
What was the half time score?
3-1 Riverside.

I would say that it was close for at least 1/3 the game.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Riverside 13-2 over Lightridge. Never close.

Man I am gonna say that you’re either a Riverside kid/ parent or just didn’t watch the game. I am not with either team, didn’t think LR had a real shot, but you’re just off
“Never close”?
What was the half time score?
3-1 Riverside.

I would say that it was close for at least 1/3 the game.

Anonymous wrote:Riverside 13-2 over Lightridge. Never close.