Anonymous
Post 07/20/2023 00:00     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.


So...you want "irresponsible" women who are stupid and reckless to be forced to become mothers to unwanted babies? Is that what you are saying? Deny them abortions because they are irresponsibly and acted stupidly and recklessly, so they will become....just what kind of mothers do you think you are creating through your punishment?


So your answer is to just kill the baby? That’s like saying low-income or foster kids people aren’t worthy of life because they don’t live a great life.

There is no “ force”. Engaging in unprotected sex knowing it can result in a child is reckless. You don’t kill a child you recklessly created because it’s an inconvenience. How about be an adult and take accountability for your mistakes and actions? How about practice safe sex or abstain? It’s like that concept is brand new to you people.
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 23:56     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.


So what’s the “good” you’re referencing? The post above you is about a woman who was forced to give birth to a baby without a skull and watch it die. She vomited talking about it in court. That’s “good”?

Forced birth PP doesn’t trouble her pretty noggin over things like a woman being forced to suffer sepsis and watching her baby die; that pesky lack of “exceptions” make her look like the deranged monster she is!


Nope. I said with exceptions which is why I don’t support the current abortion bans.
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 23:55     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

Never needed an abortion in my life, not even one of those abortions that forced birthers don’t think are abortions. Sounds like you’re speaking from a guilty conscience and a yawning chasm where your empathy gene should be.


I never had an abortion. I just don’t think a baby deserves a life punishment for your irresponsible stupidity.
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 23:54     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

Never needed an abortion in my life, not even one of those abortions that forced birthers don’t think are abortions. Sounds like you’re speaking from a guilty conscience and a yawning chasm where your empathy gene should be.


Nope. I’ve never had an abortion.
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 23:53     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

Maybe try living in reality? Half of pregnancies in this country are unplanned.


They shouldn’t be. How about being a responsible adult and using adequate protection or abstaining? It seems like Democrats aren’t a smart enough to use protection. We have over 22 forms of birth control in this country. There should never be abortions unless for the exemption reasons.
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 23:51     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

Ever heard of rape?


I love how you people throw this around. Rape accounts for less than 1% of abortions. Most abortions are out of convenience.
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 23:50     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.


So what’s the “good” you’re referencing? The post above you is about a woman who was forced to give birth to a baby without a skull and watch it die. She vomited talking about it in court. That’s “good”?


Nope. I’m happy we are having abortions restricted but I said we need exceptions in cases of SA/incest, miscarriages, and when it is a direct issue with the moms health.
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 23:49     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.


Sounds like you are way too involved in other people's private business. You take care of your body and others will do the same


A fetus isn’t your body. It’s a separate human body. When you have an abortion, you don’t kill yourself. It was never your body. You don’t want to give have a baby? Then abstain or use protection
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 23:14     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
bUt THeRe aRe nO fOrCEd BiRThs.

Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 22:58     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:



That poor woman. How can anyone read these women's testimonies and think abortion bans are a-okay? Only misogynists could.
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 22:57     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.


So...you want "irresponsible" women who are stupid and reckless to be forced to become mothers to unwanted babies? Is that what you are saying? Deny them abortions because they are irresponsibly and acted stupidly and recklessly, so they will become....just what kind of mothers do you think you are creating through your punishment?
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 20:27     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.


So what’s the “good” you’re referencing? The post above you is about a woman who was forced to give birth to a baby without a skull and watch it die. She vomited talking about it in court. That’s “good”?

Forced birth PP doesn’t trouble her pretty noggin over things like a woman being forced to suffer sepsis and watching her baby die; that pesky lack of “exceptions” make her look like the deranged monster she is!
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 20:25     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

Never needed an abortion in my life, not even one of those abortions that forced birthers don’t think are abortions. Sounds like you’re speaking from a guilty conscience and a yawning chasm where your empathy gene should be.
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 20:03     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

Maybe try living in reality? Half of pregnancies in this country are unplanned.
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 19:52     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.

Ever heard of rape?