Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 19:51     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.


Sounds like you are way too involved in other people's private business. You take care of your body and others will do the same
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 19:51     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.


So what’s the “good” you’re referencing? The post above you is about a woman who was forced to give birth to a baby without a skull and watch it die. She vomited talking about it in court. That’s “good”?
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 19:46     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Good. I’m against abortion bans because they do not include exceptions, but in 2023 with over 22 forms of birth control, no pregnancy unless through SA, should be unplanned. I’m tired of Democrats whining about “ forced births”. There is no such thing when you willingly engage in an act that can lead to pregnancy. Instead of whining about that, why not use proper protection or abstain until you can support a child? Instead you stupidly and recklessly engage in unprotected sex and then just get rid of the pregnancy because you’re too irresponsible. It sounds like many of you have a serious accountability issue.
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 18:28     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:



We all should be vomiting over the current state of affairs for health care for women. It's a sick situation in Texas and many other states.
Anonymous
Post 07/19/2023 15:21     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down


Anonymous
Post 07/18/2023 13:16     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:

Human rights on a very thin thread here just waiting for the christofascists to lop it off.
Anonymous
Post 07/18/2023 00:26     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous
Post 07/08/2023 07:22     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:“All Heather and Nick Maberry wanted to do was hold their dead baby, but strict Kentucky abortion laws meant they couldn’t.”
https://news.yahoo.com/kentucky-couple-furious-state-abortion-114612223.html

Yet another full nightmare brought to you by the forced birthers who will shove their arm down our throat and call it love.
Anonymous
Post 07/08/2023 02:02     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For those who think the 10 year old who was raped and pregnant was a "hoax":

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/07/06/gerson-fuentes-rape-abortion-sentence/

For the love of god they’re still arguing about the details of this monstrous mess in the separate thread about it.


The anti choice people don't even admit that the rapist was convinced, after they said this situation didn't even exist.
Anonymous
Post 07/07/2023 19:39     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
“All Heather and Nick Maberry wanted to do was hold their dead baby, but strict Kentucky abortion laws meant they couldn’t.”
https://news.yahoo.com/kentucky-couple-furious-state-abortion-114612223.html
Anonymous
Post 07/07/2023 07:42     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For those who think the 10 year old who was raped and pregnant was a "hoax":

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/07/06/gerson-fuentes-rape-abortion-sentence/

For the love of god they’re still arguing about the details of this monstrous mess in the separate thread about it.


I don’t actually think they are though, which is an interesting departure from last year. They do the usual racist dog whistle on immigration, shade the mother, blame the doctor, but they’re not able to engage on the actual question of “ten year old rape victim— that’s beyond the pale right?” because now it’s real and they know it.

The ballot initiative is the real test there.


Let's hope the reasonable and good people of Ohio step up and put an end to this anti women hellscape that is infecting that state and this country.
Anonymous
Post 07/07/2023 07:13     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:For those who think the 10 year old who was raped and pregnant was a "hoax":

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/07/06/gerson-fuentes-rape-abortion-sentence/

For the love of god they’re still arguing about the details of this monstrous mess in the separate thread about it.


I don’t actually think they are though, which is an interesting departure from last year. They do the usual racist dog whistle on immigration, shade the mother, blame the doctor, but they’re not able to engage on the actual question of “ten year old rape victim— that’s beyond the pale right?” because now it’s real and they know it.

The ballot initiative is the real test there.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2023 21:59     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:For those who think the 10 year old who was raped and pregnant was a "hoax":

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/07/06/gerson-fuentes-rape-abortion-sentence/

For the love of god they’re still arguing about the details of this monstrous mess in the separate thread about it.
Anonymous
Post 07/06/2023 18:19     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
For those who think the 10 year old who was raped and pregnant was a "hoax":

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/07/06/gerson-fuentes-rape-abortion-sentence/

Anonymous
Post 07/06/2023 17:34     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Fascinating and enraging article about an incarcerated former nurse who was moved to permanent solitary by a guard after sharing facts about reproduction, birth control and abortion with her fellow inmates.
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/texas-prison-talking-about-abortion/


That deserves an investigation by DoJ.