Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So this will blow your minds. My kid who is breezing through sixth grade in the TPMS magnet getting 100 percent in virtually all classes and performing very strongly in all the magnet classes, was accepted last year with a low 240s MAP-M.
And you know what? It didn't dumb down the program to take a kid with such a terribly low score! It didn't mean they were letting weaker students in. The MAP score was simply a single data point.
Don’t let DCUM insult your child! I am sure s/he is wonderful and has many great qualities, including great academics. There is no such thing as a perfect meritocracy.
Agree, just because you're kid is a little above average in math doesn't mean they shouldn't get enrichment with other slightly above average magnet kids. I just feel badly for those kids who were really gifted who didn't get lucky enough to win the lottery and spent another year plodding through 2.0 that they understood 3-5 years earlier.
240s MAP -M is 98 percentile plus. In what world is that a little above average?? And before you @me, my kid’s MAP is in the high 250s. People on this board live in an alternate reality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So this will blow your minds. My kid who is breezing through sixth grade in the TPMS magnet getting 100 percent in virtually all classes and performing very strongly in all the magnet classes, was accepted last year with a low 240s MAP-M.
And you know what? It didn't dumb down the program to take a kid with such a terribly low score! It didn't mean they were letting weaker students in. The MAP score was simply a single data point.
Don’t let DCUM insult your child! I am sure s/he is wonderful and has many great qualities, including great academics. There is no such thing as a perfect meritocracy.
Agree, just because you're kid is a little above average in math doesn't mean they shouldn't get enrichment with other slightly above average magnet kids. I just feel badly for those kids who were really gifted who didn't get lucky enough to win the lottery and spent another year plodding through 2.0 that they understood 3-5 years earlier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So this will blow your minds. My kid who is breezing through sixth grade in the TPMS magnet getting 100 percent in virtually all classes and performing very strongly in all the magnet classes, was accepted last year with a low 240s MAP-M.
And you know what? It didn't dumb down the program to take a kid with such a terribly low score! It didn't mean they were letting weaker students in. The MAP score was simply a single data point.
Don’t let DCUM insult your child! I am sure s/he is wonderful and has many great qualities, including great academics. There is no such thing as a perfect meritocracy.
Agree, just because you're kid is a little above average in math doesn't mean they shouldn't get enrichment with other slightly above average magnet kids. I just feel badly for those kids who were really gifted who didn't get lucky enough to win the lottery and spent another year plodding through 2.0 that they understood 3-5 years earlier.
2.0 is gone.
They brought it back from the dead. Since there's no longer AIM in sixth unenriched grade but grade level math that I heard was based on 2.0. I feel lucky that DD who has always been at the 95th% was lucky enough to be selected for the magnet and spared.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So this will blow your minds. My kid who is breezing through sixth grade in the TPMS magnet getting 100 percent in virtually all classes and performing very strongly in all the magnet classes, was accepted last year with a low 240s MAP-M.
And you know what? It didn't dumb down the program to take a kid with such a terribly low score! It didn't mean they were letting weaker students in. The MAP score was simply a single data point.
Don’t let DCUM insult your child! I am sure s/he is wonderful and has many great qualities, including great academics. There is no such thing as a perfect meritocracy.
Agree, just because you're kid is a little above average in math doesn't mean they shouldn't get enrichment with other slightly above average magnet kids. I just feel badly for those kids who were really gifted who didn't get lucky enough to win the lottery and spent another year plodding through 2.0 that they understood 3-5 years earlier.
2.0 is gone.
They brought it back from the dead. Since there's no longer AIM in sixth unenriched grade but grade level math that I heard was based on 2.0. I feel lucky that DD who has always been at the 95th% was lucky enough to be selected for the magnet and spared.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So this will blow your minds. My kid who is breezing through sixth grade in the TPMS magnet getting 100 percent in virtually all classes and performing very strongly in all the magnet classes, was accepted last year with a low 240s MAP-M.
And you know what? It didn't dumb down the program to take a kid with such a terribly low score! It didn't mean they were letting weaker students in. The MAP score was simply a single data point.
Don’t let DCUM insult your child! I am sure s/he is wonderful and has many great qualities, including great academics. There is no such thing as a perfect meritocracy.
Agree, just because you're kid is a little above average in math doesn't mean they shouldn't get enrichment with other slightly above average magnet kids. I just feel badly for those kids who were really gifted who didn't get lucky enough to win the lottery and spent another year plodding through 2.0 that they understood 3-5 years earlier.
2.0 is gone.
They brought it back from the dead. Since there's no longer AIM in sixth unenriched grade but grade level math that I heard was based on 2.0. I feel lucky that DD who has always been at the 95th% was lucky enough to be selected for the magnet and spared.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So this will blow your minds. My kid who is breezing through sixth grade in the TPMS magnet getting 100 percent in virtually all classes and performing very strongly in all the magnet classes, was accepted last year with a low 240s MAP-M.
And you know what? It didn't dumb down the program to take a kid with such a terribly low score! It didn't mean they were letting weaker students in. The MAP score was simply a single data point.
Don’t let DCUM insult your child! I am sure s/he is wonderful and has many great qualities, including great academics. There is no such thing as a perfect meritocracy.
Agree, just because you're kid is a little above average in math doesn't mean they shouldn't get enrichment with other slightly above average magnet kids. I just feel badly for those kids who were really gifted who didn't get lucky enough to win the lottery and spent another year plodding through 2.0 that they understood 3-5 years earlier.
2.0 is gone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So this will blow your minds. My kid who is breezing through sixth grade in the TPMS magnet getting 100 percent in virtually all classes and performing very strongly in all the magnet classes, was accepted last year with a low 240s MAP-M.
And you know what? It didn't dumb down the program to take a kid with such a terribly low score! It didn't mean they were letting weaker students in. The MAP score was simply a single data point.
Don’t let DCUM insult your child! I am sure s/he is wonderful and has many great qualities, including great academics. There is no such thing as a perfect meritocracy.
Agree, just because you're kid is a little above average in math doesn't mean they shouldn't get enrichment with other slightly above average magnet kids. I just feel badly for those kids who were really gifted who didn't get lucky enough to win the lottery and spent another year plodding through 2.0 that they understood 3-5 years earlier.
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't surprise me. Have a child take a summer math class and they can skip to Algebra I in 6th grade. Its splitting hairs to try to distinguish among kids in the top percentiles. Especially when everybody knows MAP scores track with SES.
Anonymous wrote:Thanks for the breath of fresh air! Our kids will be fine wherever they go. As developmental experts will tell you, kids will learn from whatever is around them, at the level of giftedness they need.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So this will blow your minds. My kid who is breezing through sixth grade in the TPMS magnet getting 100 percent in virtually all classes and performing very strongly in all the magnet classes, was accepted last year with a low 240s MAP-M.
And you know what? It didn't dumb down the program to take a kid with such a terribly low score! It didn't mean they were letting weaker students in. The MAP score was simply a single data point.
Don’t let DCUM insult your child! I am sure s/he is wonderful and has many great qualities, including great academics. There is no such thing as a perfect meritocracy.
Agree, just because you're kid is a little above average in math doesn't mean they shouldn't get enrichment with other slightly above average magnet kids. I just feel badly for those kids who were really gifted who didn't get lucky enough to win the lottery and spent another year plodding through 2.0 that they understood 3-5 years earlier.
Anonymous wrote:So this will blow your minds. My kid who is breezing through sixth grade in the TPMS magnet getting 100 percent in virtually all classes and performing very strongly in all the magnet classes, was accepted last year with a low 240s MAP-M.
And you know what? It didn't dumb down the program to take a kid with such a terribly low score! It didn't mean they were letting weaker students in. The MAP score was simply a single data point.