Ha! A bunch of privileged SJW harpies getting on record to malign white men while using the technology and creature comforts invented by . . . white men.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Black men commit half the violent crimes in this country despite being about 6% of the population, over 70% of black children are born out of wedlock, abd black men have huge incarceration, high school
dropout and unemployment rates. But, hey, white men are the problem.

First, black men are arrested for half the violent crimes in this country. White men are not as often arrested for the same infractions. So you're not comparing apples to apples.

70% of black children are born to single mothers, which has stayed about the same for decades. Over 50% of Hispanic children and over 30% of white children are also born to single mothers. And over 40% of children overall are born in poverty. But it is white men voting for candidates who oppose any social supports to help those children, and it is white men voting for candidates who oppose better access to birth control and abortion, so yes, they are a problem.

So you are saying that black men and black people have no responsibility or ownership over their own lives and choices? Wow.

I was talking about children being born into poverty, no, they need adults to vote on policies to help them, and white men consistently vote to screw them

Some of their parents do a pretty good job of screwing everything up for them too. They are grown adults with brains and free will and there is no excuse. You can’t blame everything on white men.

I can absolutely blame the white men--rich and poor--who consistently vote for candidates in the 14 states that refuse to expand Medicaid when the Medicaid expansion will be beneficial to low-income people of all races but especially people of color who are more likely to have chronic health conditions. And the 12 states that refuse to cover low-income women for a year after birth, including in Texas, which has a maternal death rate worse than some third-world countries. If white men voted differently, they could save lives. But they won't do it. And they are the voting bloc that is the common denominator in all of the states that have refused the Medicaid expansion.

everything you said is still true is you cross out the phrase white men and replace it with white women

Some of you are so filled with jealousy, anger, bigotry and hatred you are calling out white men for the same. The irony.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:James Bond will be replaced by a black woman
Peter Parker was replaced by Miles Morales
Ghostbusters were replaced by 3 women in a terrible movie
Tony Stark was replaced by a black female character Riri Williams as Ironman/woman
Thor has been replaced by a female character
Captain America is now black
The Hulk has been replaced with an Asian character (which I actually find as even more offensive because it is a flimsy attempt at trying to dispel the stereotype of weak/meek/less masculine asian men)

that's just a tip of the list


There's diversity in media, but the examples above are just ridiculous pandering and are thoroughly contrived/lazy attempts at diversity. How about making up new characters rather than trying to replace those 'white male oppressors'. Have fund with 007 now as a black female, because these days you can't have an alpha male character who actually sleeps with beautiful women. He's either gotta be gay/trans or a female, and if he's white it is a double strike. Gotta replace, replace, replace. heaven forbid a new black female british spy be called 008 rather than replacing 007.....

You are so dumb. Do you even understand the new James Bond script?

In the film, Bond - as played by Daniel Craig - has gone into retirement. Therefore, a new agent is promoted to "license to kill" and receives the 007 identifier. The entire point is that "007" belongs to no singular person forever. In the new movie, Bond has to come out of retirement to help the new "007" agent in her mission.

Also, do you really think that she - the new "007" in one single film - will live? Haha, no.

Ridiculous pandering attempt

I mean, let's see how it does. If it is a commercial failure, they might pivot in a different direction. If it does well, it demonstrates an international audience for a Bond movie that stars BOTH a white man and a WoC.

All of the lazy replacement attempts marvel has done HAS been a commercial failure for Marvel on their comics sale side.

Jeez, no surprise that the main audience for comic books don't like change:




The comics are a loss leader for the MANY BILLIONS that the movies pull in. No one counting the money cares about comics sales.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be nice if I could tune in to NPR and just once -- -once -- hear a white male announcer. Usually it is a female with a foreign accent that I can't understand. And the topic is typically how white men are the root of all evil in the world.

I am so done with NPR.

The part in bold is so true - and so very very tiresome about NPR. It’s just unlistenable now.

I mean, are they wrong? White people voted in that thing currently in the White House. Statistically we are the majority in this country still.

Yes whites are the vast majority, but the media is largely liberal. Many sheep are easily brainwashed. As for the current president he was running against a equally poor candidate or worse especially with Bill as VP. Biden will be a 1 term President because of his age, he is barely sputtering along which will be interesting to see who wins the next one. If he does poorly Trump could make a comeback.

DP.. why do you suppose MSM has a liberal bent to it? Media is largely owned by rich white people.

Anybody rich enough to own a media company isn’t liberal no matter what they say or how gay they are. You aren’t progressive if you have that much money. Period.

But MSM is liberal. So, why is that?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:James Bond will be replaced by a black woman
Peter Parker was replaced by Miles Morales
Ghostbusters were replaced by 3 women in a terrible movie
Tony Stark was replaced by a black female character Riri Williams as Ironman/woman
Thor has been replaced by a female character
Captain America is now black
The Hulk has been replaced with an Asian character (which I actually find as even more offensive because it is a flimsy attempt at trying to dispel the stereotype of weak/meek/less masculine asian men)

that's just a tip of the list


There's diversity in media, but the examples above are just ridiculous pandering and are thoroughly contrived/lazy attempts at diversity. How about making up new characters rather than trying to replace those 'white male oppressors'. Have fund with 007 now as a black female, because these days you can't have an alpha male character who actually sleeps with beautiful women. He's either gotta be gay/trans or a female, and if he's white it is a double strike. Gotta replace, replace, replace. heaven forbid a new black female british spy be called 008 rather than replacing 007.....

You are so dumb. Do you even understand the new James Bond script?

In the film, Bond - as played by Daniel Craig - has gone into retirement. Therefore, a new agent is promoted to "license to kill" and receives the 007 identifier. The entire point is that "007" belongs to no singular person forever. In the new movie, Bond has to come out of retirement to help the new "007" agent in her mission.

Also, do you really think that she - the new "007" in one single film - will live? Haha, no.

Ridiculous pandering attempt

I mean, let's see how it does. If it is a commercial failure, they might pivot in a different direction. If it does well, it demonstrates an international audience for a Bond movie that stars BOTH a white man and a WoC.

All of the lazy replacement attempts marvel has done HAS been a commercial failure for Marvel on their comics sale side.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:James Bond will be replaced by a black woman
Peter Parker was replaced by Miles Morales
Ghostbusters were replaced by 3 women in a terrible movie
Tony Stark was replaced by a black female character Riri Williams as Ironman/woman
Thor has been replaced by a female character
Captain America is now black
The Hulk has been replaced with an Asian character (which I actually find as even more offensive because it is a flimsy attempt at trying to dispel the stereotype of weak/meek/less masculine asian men)

that's just a tip of the list


There's diversity in media, but the examples above are just ridiculous pandering and are thoroughly contrived/lazy attempts at diversity. How about making up new characters rather than trying to replace those 'white male oppressors'. Have fund with 007 now as a black female, because these days you can't have an alpha male character who actually sleeps with beautiful women. He's either gotta be gay/trans or a female, and if he's white it is a double strike. Gotta replace, replace, replace. heaven forbid a new black female british spy be called 008 rather than replacing 007.....

You are so dumb. Do you even understand the new James Bond script?

In the film, Bond - as played by Daniel Craig - has gone into retirement. Therefore, a new agent is promoted to "license to kill" and receives the 007 identifier. The entire point is that "007" belongs to no singular person forever. In the new movie, Bond has to come out of retirement to help the new "007" agent in her mission.

Also, do you really think that she - the new "007" in one single film - will live? Haha, no.

Ridiculous pandering attempt

I mean, let's see how it does. If it is a commercial failure, they might pivot in a different direction. If it does well, it demonstrates an international audience for a Bond movie that stars BOTH a white man and a WoC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:James Bond will be replaced by a black woman
Peter Parker was replaced by Miles Morales
Ghostbusters were replaced by 3 women in a terrible movie
Tony Stark was replaced by a black female character Riri Williams as Ironman/woman
Thor has been replaced by a female character
Captain America is now black
The Hulk has been replaced with an Asian character (which I actually find as even more offensive because it is a flimsy attempt at trying to dispel the stereotype of weak/meek/less masculine asian men)

that's just a tip of the list


There's diversity in media, but the examples above are just ridiculous pandering and are thoroughly contrived/lazy attempts at diversity. How about making up new characters rather than trying to replace those 'white male oppressors'. Have fund with 007 now as a black female, because these days you can't have an alpha male character who actually sleeps with beautiful women. He's either gotta be gay/trans or a female, and if he's white it is a double strike. Gotta replace, replace, replace. heaven forbid a new black female british spy be called 008 rather than replacing 007.....

You are so dumb. Do you even understand the new James Bond script?

In the film, Bond - as played by Daniel Craig - has gone into retirement. Therefore, a new agent is promoted to "license to kill" and receives the 007 identifier. The entire point is that "007" belongs to no singular person forever. In the new movie, Bond has to come out of retirement to help the new "007" agent in her mission.

Also, do you really think that she - the new "007" in one single film - will live? Haha, no.

Ridiculous pandering attempt

How the f#ck is this pandering? You realize some of the CIA's most successful agents in the past 20 years were women of Middle Eastern descent, right?

Daniel Craig - white James Bond - is still the titular and main character in the film.

It sounds to me like you way too sensitive and easily triggered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be nice if I could tune in to NPR and just once -- -once -- hear a white male announcer. Usually it is a female with a foreign accent that I can't understand. And the topic is typically how white men are the root of all evil in the world.

I am so done with NPR.

The part in bold is so true - and so very very tiresome about NPR. It’s just unlistenable now.

I mean, are they wrong? White people voted in that thing currently in the White House. Statistically we are the majority in this country still.

Yes whites are the vast majority, but the media is largely liberal. Many sheep are easily brainwashed. As for the current president he was running against a equally poor candidate or worse especially with Bill as VP. Biden will be a 1 term President because of his age, he is barely sputtering along which will be interesting to see who wins the next one. If he does poorly Trump could make a comeback.

DP.. why do you suppose MSM has a liberal bent to it? Media is largely owned by rich white people.

Anybody rich enough to own a media company isn’t liberal no matter what they say or how gay they are. You aren’t progressive if you have that much money. Period.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:James Bond will be replaced by a black woman
Peter Parker was replaced by Miles Morales
Ghostbusters were replaced by 3 women in a terrible movie
Tony Stark was replaced by a black female character Riri Williams as Ironman/woman
Thor has been replaced by a female character
Captain America is now black
The Hulk has been replaced with an Asian character (which I actually find as even more offensive because it is a flimsy attempt at trying to dispel the stereotype of weak/meek/less masculine asian men)

that's just a tip of the list


There's diversity in media, but the examples above are just ridiculous pandering and are thoroughly contrived/lazy attempts at diversity. How about making up new characters rather than trying to replace those 'white male oppressors'. Have fund with 007 now as a black female, because these days you can't have an alpha male character who actually sleeps with beautiful women. He's either gotta be gay/trans or a female, and if he's white it is a double strike. Gotta replace, replace, replace. heaven forbid a new black female british spy be called 008 rather than replacing 007.....

You are so dumb. Do you even understand the new James Bond script?

In the film, Bond - as played by Daniel Craig - has gone into retirement. Therefore, a new agent is promoted to "license to kill" and receives the 007 identifier. The entire point is that "007" belongs to no singular person forever. In the new movie, Bond has to come out of retirement to help the new "007" agent in her mission.

Also, do you really think that she - the new "007" in one single film - will live? Haha, no.

Ridiculous pandering attempt

Anonymous wrote:James Bond will be replaced by a black woman
Peter Parker was replaced by Miles Morales
Ghostbusters were replaced by 3 women in a terrible movie
Tony Stark was replaced by a black female character Riri Williams as Ironman/woman
Thor has been replaced by a female character
Captain America is now black
The Hulk has been replaced with an Asian character (which I actually find as even more offensive because it is a flimsy attempt at trying to dispel the stereotype of weak/meek/less masculine asian men)

that's just a tip of the list


There's diversity in media, but the examples above are just ridiculous pandering and are thoroughly contrived/lazy attempts at diversity. How about making up new characters rather than trying to replace those 'white male oppressors'. Have fund with 007 now as a black female, because these days you can't have an alpha male character who actually sleeps with beautiful women. He's either gotta be gay/trans or a female, and if he's white it is a double strike. Gotta replace, replace, replace. heaven forbid a new black female british spy be called 008 rather than replacing 007.....

You are so dumb. Do you even understand the new James Bond script?

In the film, Bond - as played by Daniel Craig - has gone into retirement. Therefore, a new agent is promoted to "license to kill" and receives the 007 identifier. The entire point is that "007" belongs to no singular person forever. In the new movie, Bond has to come out of retirement to help the new "007" agent in her mission.

Also, do you really think that she - the new "007" in one single film - will live? Haha, no.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be nice if I could tune in to NPR and just once -- -once -- hear a white male announcer. Usually it is a female with a foreign accent that I can't understand. And the topic is typically how white men are the root of all evil in the world.

I am so done with NPR.

The part in bold is so true - and so very very tiresome about NPR. It’s just unlistenable now.

You folks are moronic liars.

The most popular show on NPR - Morning Edition - has all-white hosts:
Steve Inskeep - https://www.npr.org/people/4080709/steve-inskeep
Rachel Martin - https://www.npr.org/people/128649543/rachel-martin
Noel King - https://www.npr.org/people/471007931/noel-king (she is biracial - black/white)
David Green - https://www.npr.org/people/4510160/david-greene

The daily economic report each morning is hosted by a white dude, David Branchaccio.
Planet Money? White guy, Robert Smith.
Fresh Air? Terry Gross, white lady.

Stop your dumb and fake pity party.

-White guy who knows you're full of sh#t

James Bond will be replaced by a black woman
Peter Parker was replaced by Miles Morales
Ghostbusters were replaced by 3 women in a terrible movie
Tony Stark was replaced by a black female character Riri Williams as Ironman/woman
Thor has been replaced by a female character
Captain America is now black
The Hulk has been replaced with an Asian character (which I actually find as even more offensive because it is a flimsy attempt at trying to dispel the stereotype of weak/meek/less masculine asian men)

that's just a tip of the list


There's diversity in media, but the examples above are just ridiculous pandering and are thoroughly contrived/lazy attempts at diversity. How about making up new characters rather than trying to replace those 'white male oppressors'. Have fund with 007 now as a black female, because these days you can't have an alpha male character who actually sleeps with beautiful women. He's either gotta be gay/trans or a female, and if he's white it is a double strike. Gotta replace, replace, replace. heaven forbid a new black female british spy be called 008 rather than replacing 007.....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be nice if I could tune in to NPR and just once -- -once -- hear a white male announcer. Usually it is a female with a foreign accent that I can't understand. And the topic is typically how white men are the root of all evil in the world.

I am so done with NPR.

The part in bold is so true - and so very very tiresome about NPR. It’s just unlistenable now.

I mean, are they wrong? White people voted in that thing currently in the White House. Statistically we are the majority in this country still.

Yes whites are the vast majority, but the media is largely liberal. Many sheep are easily brainwashed. As for the current president he was running against a equally poor candidate or worse especially with Bill as VP. Biden will be a 1 term President because of his age, he is barely sputtering along which will be interesting to see who wins the next one. If he does poorly Trump could make a comeback.

DP.. why do you suppose MSM has a liberal bent to it? Media is largely owned by rich white people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be nice if I could tune in to NPR and just once -- -once -- hear a white male announcer. Usually it is a female with a foreign accent that I can't understand. And the topic is typically how white men are the root of all evil in the world.

I am so done with NPR.

The part in bold is so true - and so very very tiresome about NPR. It’s just unlistenable now.

I mean, are they wrong? White people voted in that thing currently in the White House. Statistically we are the majority in this country still.

Yes whites are the vast majority, but the media is largely liberal. Many sheep are easily brainwashed. As for the current president he was running against a equally poor candidate or worse especially with Bill as VP. Biden will be a 1 term President because of his age, he is barely sputtering along which will be interesting to see who wins the next one. If he does poorly Trump could make a comeback.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Black men commit half the violent crimes in this country despite being about 6% of the population, over 70% of black children are born out of wedlock, abd black men have huge incarceration, high school
dropout and unemployment rates. But, hey, white men are the problem.

First, black men are arrested for half the violent crimes in this country. White men are not as often arrested for the same infractions. So you're not comparing apples to apples.

70% of black children are born to single mothers, which has stayed about the same for decades. Over 50% of Hispanic children and over 30% of white children are also born to single mothers. And over 40% of children overall are born in poverty. But it is white men voting for candidates who oppose any social supports to help those children, and it is white men voting for candidates who oppose better access to birth control and abortion, so yes, they are a problem.

So you are saying that black men and black people have no responsibility or ownership over their own lives and choices? Wow.

I was talking about children being born into poverty, no, they need adults to vote on policies to help them, and white men consistently vote to screw them

Some of their parents do a pretty good job of screwing everything up for them too. They are grown adults with brains and free will and there is no excuse. You can’t blame everything on white men.

I've seen more than a few parents in poverty who were just teenagers or barely out of their teens. Turns out their parents and grandparents were in that same situation. Very few teens (even UMC ones) would be able to succeed on their own with a setup like that. Generational poverty passed down.
My family were immigrants. They were white collar in the country they came from, but did blue collar work in the US. We initially grew up in the inner city. Our suitcases were very light when we arrived and you would think we were as poor as our neighbors, but we brought wealth passed on from our grandparents and great grandparents. We came knowing that living within our means was important, could differentiate between wants and needs, no one had any addictions. We knew a tidy house was important to our health and mental wellbeing. Education was prioritized. The list could go on and on. We didn't look down on our neighbors. We could tell they were not taught these things. There was no superiority on our part. In their shoes, we would be the same.