Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:irrelevant bc pipeline holds back their best players on both the boys and girls sides

That isn’t true, on the girls side, 2 to 3 players a year move up. On the boy’s, they seem to leave more all at one time. For example, pipeline preacademy 2007 was combined with Pipeline North 2007 two years ago because a bunch of boys moved to da as soon as they were eligible, with pipeline preacademy being the surviving team. There is now another Pipeline 2007 team, but with entirely different player and coach.

The 07 boys who moved to Armour 2 years ago were all from Pipeline North which was for all intents and purposes not even a Pipeline team, other than name and uniform. That team had their own field, their own coach, and came from another club a couple years prior. No players from the "pre-academy" team went to Armour, not did they go this past year.

Anonymous wrote:I am glad the DA falling apart was just a rumor

Asking for a Pipeline hater is too funny

Parents and players are calling other clubs...be back getting a call

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:irrelevant bc pipeline holds back their best players on both the boys and girls sides

That isn’t true, on the girls side, 2 to 3 players a year move up. On the boy’s, they seem to leave more all at one time. For example, pipeline preacademy 2007 was combined with Pipeline North 2007 two years ago because a bunch of boys moved to da as soon as they were eligible, with pipeline preacademy being the surviving team. There is now another Pipeline 2007 team, but with entirely different player and coach.

Anonymous wrote:What is happening to the so-called powerful Baltimore Armour?

Is it Rumors...Soccer America, TopDrawer and now the Athletic are sharing the same info that looks to be coming out soon

Anonymous wrote:Just ignore the Pipeline hater. These discussions are full of twits. I have seen haters try to disparage McLean, FCV, Pipeline, etc. Any club that has a half dozen of its teams across age groups qualifying for the top brackets in the most competitive tournaments, while also sending a few players per age group to its DA affiliate, is a top club in the DMV. For the moron who referenced PDA, no one said anything about NJ or nationally. The argument was that Pipeline is one of the best team in the area. Again, any parent with a kid on a serious soccer team knows this.

Anonymous wrote:Just ignore the Pipeline hater. These discussions are full of twits. I have seen haters try to disparage McLean, FCV, Pipeline, etc. Any club that has a half dozen of its teams across age groups qualifying for the top brackets in the most competitive tournaments, while also sending a few players per age group to its DA affiliate, is a top club in the DMV. For the moron who referenced PDA, no one said anything about NJ or nationally. The argument was that Pipeline is one of the best team in the area. Again, any parent with a kid on a serious soccer team knows this.

Anonymous wrote:06 Boys at Pipeline are good...someone should research how they got to Pipeline...money talks

Articles to read today on the DA...SoccerAmerica and TopDrawer

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:irrelevant bc pipeline holds back their best players on both the boys and girls sides

That isn’t true, on the girls side, 2 to 3 players a year move up. On the boy’s, they seem to leave more all at one time. For example, pipeline preacademy 2007 was combined with Pipeline North 2007 two years ago because a bunch of boys moved to da as soon as they were eligible, with pipeline preacademy being the surviving team. There is now another Pipeline 2007 team, but with entirely different player and coach.

2 to 3 players doesnt mean they're the best. 06 boys are a good example of pipeline keeping players instead of encouraging/sending players to join BA. Its a result of how the pipeline coaches and teams are managed.

Sounds like a political mess.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:irrelevant bc pipeline holds back their best players on both the boys and girls sides

That isn’t true, on the girls side, 2 to 3 players a year move up. On the boy’s, they seem to leave more all at one time. For example, pipeline preacademy 2007 was combined with Pipeline North 2007 two years ago because a bunch of boys moved to da as soon as they were eligible, with pipeline preacademy being the surviving team. There is now another Pipeline 2007 team, but with entirely different player and coach.

2 to 3 players doesnt mean they're the best. 06 boys are a good example of pipeline keeping players instead of encouraging/sending players to join BA. Its a result of how the pipeline coaches and teams are managed.