Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I honestly don't think there is one person who gets all the way through a pregnancy, into labor and goes "Oh, never mind..."

I mean, yeah, I guess labor pains may make you think "what the hell did I get myself into?" because DAMN!

But, honestly, you people are making up scenarios in your heads that are not real life.

You have no clue, my friend.
Why did NY just make it legal to kill the baby minutes before the mother is about to go into labor???

In which cases can that be done? Be specific now.

NP. In cases where the mother's emotional health is at stake.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I honestly don't think there is one person who gets all the way through a pregnancy, into labor and goes "Oh, never mind..."

I mean, yeah, I guess labor pains may make you think "what the hell did I get myself into?" because DAMN!

But, honestly, you people are making up scenarios in your heads that are not real life.

You have no clue, my friend.
Why did NY just make it legal to kill the baby minutes before the mother is about to go into labor???

In which cases can that be done? Be specific now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I honestly don't think there is one person who gets all the way through a pregnancy, into labor and goes "Oh, never mind..."

I mean, yeah, I guess labor pains may make you think "what the hell did I get myself into?" because DAMN!

But, honestly, you people are making up scenarios in your heads that are not real life.

You have no clue, my friend.
Why did NY just make it legal to kill the baby minutes before the mother is about to go into labor???

Anonymous wrote:I honestly don't think there is one person who gets all the way through a pregnancy, into labor and goes "Oh, never mind..."

I mean, yeah, I guess labor pains may make you think "what the hell did I get myself into?" because DAMN!

But, honestly, you people are making up scenarios in your heads that are not real life.

Anonymous wrote:Abortion doctors are murderors.

Anonymous wrote:Abortion doctors are murderors.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Right. What this bill would do is allow abortion in terrible cases, like this real world example: fetus has anecephaly (no brain) in late pregnancy. The position of the fetus is transverse, so cannot be delivered vaginally. Rather than having a c-section (threatening the mother's health and future pregnancies) she opts for an abortion.

Thank you for this. Hence why this needs to be a decision between a woman, her doctor and NO ONE ELSE!

Anonymous wrote:

Right. What this bill would do is allow abortion in terrible cases, like this real world example: fetus has anecephaly (no brain) in late pregnancy. The position of the fetus is transverse, so cannot be delivered vaginally. Rather than having a c-section (threatening the mother's health and future pregnancies) she opts for an abortion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Similar legislation has been proposed by Kathy Tran (D) in Virginia now.
It's sickening.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/42803/watch-virginia-democrats-propose-bill-allowing-ryan-saavedra

Here's the exchange between Todd Gilbert (R-Shenandoah) and Kathy Tran (D-Fairfax):

Gilbert: So how late in the third trimester would you be able to do that?

Tran: It’s very unfortunate that our physician witnesses were not able to attend today.

Gilbert: No, I’m talking about your bill. How late in the third trimester could a physician perform an abortion if he indicated it would impair the mental health of the woman?

Tran: Or physical health.

Gilbert: Okay. I’m talking about the mental health.

Tran: Through the third trimester. The third trimester goes all the way up to 40 weeks.

Gilbert: Okay. But to the end of the third trimester?

Tran: Yep. I don’t think we have a limit in the bill.

Gilbert: Where it’s obvious a woman is about to give birth, that she has physical signs that she is about to give birth. Would that be a point at which she could still request an abortion if she was so certified? She’s dilating.

Tran: Mr. Chairman, that would be a decision that the doctor, the physician, and the woman would make at that point.

Gilbert: I understand that. I’m asking if your bill allows that.

Tran: My bill would allow that, yes.

”Since this probably won’t be the last we see of that Kathy Tran abortion clip, here’s what her bill actually does.
ph
Third-trimester abortion is already legal in Virginia when the mother’s life or health is at risk. The bill loosens those restrictions. It doesnt say anything goes.” - Graham Moomaw, the Richmond Times Dispatch

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since our society expects women to raise a child without financial or any other kind of assistance, women should have the right to make the decision alone as to whether she will have the child. If society actually valued children and life, we would have better daycare options, better public education, better poverty assistance programs. Please stop with the infanticide and murder cries and actually show us through child-friendly policies!

There is a reason sperm is required for pregnancy... the intent is that a woman would not HAVE to raise a child without financial or any other kind of assistance because..... there would be a father there to help with the finances, emotional support, childcare, etc.
But, activist feminists have lectured women for years that men are expendable - not necessary - to raise children.
Spare me your outrage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you don't want an abortion, don't have one.

If you don't want women to have abortions, then
1) pay for their medical care
2) pay for their birth control
3) pay for men to have vasectomies
4) offer to house the pregnant women, pay for their care, and adopt the child

Using your logic I can just kill you because that’s my choice.

Anonymous wrote:If you don't want an abortion, don't have one.

If you don't want women to have abortions, then
1) pay for their medical care
2) pay for their birth control
3) pay for men to have vasectomies
4) offer to house the pregnant women, pay for their care, and adopt the child

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since our society expects women to raise a child without financial or any other kind of assistance, women should have the right to make the decision alone as to whether she will have the child. If society actually valued children and life, we would have better daycare options, better public education, better poverty assistance programs. Please stop with the infanticide and murder cries and actually show us through child-friendly policies!

There is a reason sperm is required for pregnancy... the intent is that a woman would not HAVE to raise a child without financial or any other kind of assistance because..... there would be a father there to help with the finances, emotional support, childcare, etc.
But, activist feminists have lectured women for years that men are expendable - not necessary - to raise children.
Spare me your outrage.

We should outlaw negligent insemination.

I'm telling you, requiring vasectomies is the only solution to getting rid of abortion. The unwanted baby rate would drop to almost nothing. No teen pregnancies, too. It would solve so many issues.