Anonymous wrote:Born in 1962 and definitely, a Gen Xer. Much more in common with that group, although I'm technically a boomer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Overall, I find generations to be too large. Generations would be more accurately depicted if they were broken down by decade. Millenials span from like 1980 to 2000, which is way too large.
This. As an early 80s millenial a lot of the generalizations don't really apply. And when my early 40s colleagues complain about millennials they don't seem to realize this includes people who are solidly into their 30s.
Anonymous wrote:1960-64 is Generation Jones.
Anonymous wrote:My brothers were born in 64 and 65 and are not baby boomers - mostly because they were the beginning our parents legacy of 3 Gen X daughters. So their music, fashion, trends and childhood was all Gen X.
Our parents were Silent Generation so maybe that has some influence?
Anonymous wrote:‘61 here. Technically a Boomer, but I don’t feel like either a Boomer or a Gen Xer. Can’t relate to either.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody who was alive when Eisenhower was president or entered college in the 1970s can claim Generation X status. 1960 is still full-fledged boomer.