Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Until Hill parents stop acting ridiculously entitled, selfish, and clueless, they will all end this way. I for one wish we could just ban discussion of Stuart Hobson and Watkins on here. Everyone who thinks it is doom for their snowflake - move to Arlington. Everyone who actually wants to give it a go - get to work.
Do the professional educators, planners, administrators at DCPS have NO responsibility here at all? Are they completely let off the hook? See, your plan for school improvement is unrealistic because we don't have to put up with dysfunction--people can live in their homes on the Hill and choose to go private, choose to home school or choose to go charter. That's our right. DCPS ( and you ) would like to pretend that is not so. It is also our prerogative to discuss Stuart Hobson as much as we'd like. Also our right. That's reality. You ( and DCPS ) would do well to live in reality rather than thrown silly names at people and tell them to move.
what do you want them to do?
make an accelerated high school program with IB? done. now some white/high SES people say they won't try it because the kids there don't score high enough on IB exams (though that's probably not the sole reason)
group all the richest/highest performing elementary schools into a single middle school? not going to happen. It would suck for the other middle schools on the hill, it makes no geographic sense, for a million other reasons, not going to happen.
solve generational poverty? good luck with that. too big an issue for the schools to handle themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Until Hill parents stop acting ridiculously entitled, selfish, and clueless, they will all end this way. I for one wish we could just ban discussion of Stuart Hobson and Watkins on here. Everyone who thinks it is doom for their snowflake - move to Arlington. Everyone who actually wants to give it a go - get to work.
Do the professional educators, planners, administrators at DCPS have NO responsibility here at all? Are they completely let off the hook? See, your plan for school improvement is unrealistic because we don't have to put up with dysfunction--people can live in their homes on the Hill and choose to go private, choose to home school or choose to go charter. That's our right. DCPS ( and you ) would like to pretend that is not so. It is also our prerogative to discuss Stuart Hobson as much as we'd like. Also our right. That's reality. You ( and DCPS ) would do well to live in reality rather than thrown silly names at people and tell them to move.
+1000. Can't stand name-calling snowflake basher guy. He stalks these Hill threads relentlesly like the loser he is. What a racist, immature asshole.
Signed. AA Parent Living IB for the Cluster with No Short, Medium or Long-term Plans to Enroll Elementary School-Age Offspring at Watkins or SH, or Move to Arlington Either
not PP you're referring to but you won't be missed
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Until Hill parents stop acting ridiculously entitled, selfish, and clueless, they will all end this way. I for one wish we could just ban discussion of Stuart Hobson and Watkins on here. Everyone who thinks it is doom for their snowflake - move to Arlington. Everyone who actually wants to give it a go - get to work.
Do the professional educators, planners, administrators at DCPS have NO responsibility here at all? Are they completely let off the hook? See, your plan for school improvement is unrealistic because we don't have to put up with dysfunction--people can live in their homes on the Hill and choose to go private, choose to home school or choose to go charter. That's our right. DCPS ( and you ) would like to pretend that is not so. It is also our prerogative to discuss Stuart Hobson as much as we'd like. Also our right. That's reality. You ( and DCPS ) would do well to live in reality rather than thrown silly names at people and tell them to move.
+1000. Can't stand name-calling snowflake basher guy. He stalks these Hill threads relentlesly like the loser he is. What a racist, immature asshole.
Signed. AA Parent Living IB for the Cluster with No Short, Medium or Long-term Plans to Enroll Elementary School-Age Offspring at Watkins or SH, or Move to Arlington Either
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Until Hill parents stop acting ridiculously entitled, selfish, and clueless, they will all end this way. I for one wish we could just ban discussion of Stuart Hobson and Watkins on here. Everyone who thinks it is doom for their snowflake - move to Arlington. Everyone who actually wants to give it a go - get to work.
Do the professional educators, planners, administrators at DCPS have NO responsibility here at all? Are they completely let off the hook? See, your plan for school improvement is unrealistic because we don't have to put up with dysfunction--people can live in their homes on the Hill and choose to go private, choose to home school or choose to go charter. That's our right. DCPS ( and you ) would like to pretend that is not so. It is also our prerogative to discuss Stuart Hobson as much as we'd like. Also our right. That's reality. You ( and DCPS ) would do well to live in reality rather than thrown silly names at people and tell them to move.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Until Hill parents stop acting ridiculously entitled, selfish, and clueless, they will all end this way. I for one wish we could just ban discussion of Stuart Hobson and Watkins on here. Everyone who thinks it is doom for their snowflake - move to Arlington. Everyone who actually wants to give it a go - get to work.
Do the professional educators, planners, administrators at DCPS have NO responsibility here at all? Are they completely let off the hook? See, your plan for school improvement is unrealistic because we don't have to put up with dysfunction--people can live in their homes on the Hill and choose to go private, choose to home school or choose to go charter. That's our right. DCPS ( and you ) would like to pretend that is not so. It is also our prerogative to discuss Stuart Hobson as much as we'd like. Also our right. That's reality. You ( and DCPS ) would do well to live in reality rather than thrown silly names at people and tell them to move.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Until Hill parents stop acting ridiculously entitled, selfish, and clueless, they will all end this way. I for one wish we could just ban discussion of Stuart Hobson and Watkins on here. Everyone who thinks it is doom for their snowflake - move to Arlington. Everyone who actually wants to give it a go - get to work.
Do the professional educators, planners, administrators at DCPS have NO responsibility here at all? Are they completely let off the hook? See, your plan for school improvement is unrealistic because we don't have to put up with dysfunction--people can live in their homes on the Hill and choose to go private, choose to home school or choose to go charter. That's our right. DCPS ( and you ) would like to pretend that is not so. It is also our prerogative to discuss Stuart Hobson as much as we'd like. Also our right. That's reality. You ( and DCPS ) would do well to live in reality rather than thrown silly names at people and tell them to move.
+1000. Can't stand name-calling snowflake basher guy. He stalks these Hill threads relentlesly like the loser he is. What a racist, immature asshole.
Signed. AA Parent Living IB for the Cluster with No Short, Medium or Long-term Plans to Enroll Elementary School-Age Offspring at Watkins or SH, or Move to Arlington Either
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Until Hill parents stop acting ridiculously entitled, selfish, and clueless, they will all end this way. I for one wish we could just ban discussion of Stuart Hobson and Watkins on here. Everyone who thinks it is doom for their snowflake - move to Arlington. Everyone who actually wants to give it a go - get to work.
Do the professional educators, planners, administrators at DCPS have NO responsibility here at all? Are they completely let off the hook? See, your plan for school improvement is unrealistic because we don't have to put up with dysfunction--people can live in their homes on the Hill and choose to go private, choose to home school or choose to go charter. That's our right. DCPS ( and you ) would like to pretend that is not so. It is also our prerogative to discuss Stuart Hobson as much as we'd like. Also our right. That's reality. You ( and DCPS ) would do well to live in reality rather than thrown silly names at people and tell them to move.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Until Hill parents stop acting ridiculously entitled, selfish, and clueless, they will all end this way. I for one wish we could just ban discussion of Stuart Hobson and Watkins on here. Everyone who thinks it is doom for their snowflake - move to Arlington. Everyone who actually wants to give it a go - get to work.
a lot of families are doing just that. I suspect it's the charter boosters who feel obliged to bash anything and everything about SH, as well as Eliot Hine and Jefferson. It helps them rationalize their weak commitment to true public education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Until Hill parents stop acting ridiculously entitled, selfish, and clueless, they will all end this way. I for one wish we could just ban discussion of Stuart Hobson and Watkins on here. Everyone who thinks it is doom for their snowflake - move to Arlington. Everyone who actually wants to give it a go - get to work.
a lot of families are doing just that. I suspect it's the charter boosters who feel obliged to bash anything and everything about SH, as well as Eliot Hine and Jefferson. It helps them rationalize their weak commitment to true public education.
As a person who supports PUBLIC charter schools, I do so because I think it cruel and immoral to force families who have no means to move or afford private to endure the morass of public neighborhood schools that are offered to them. The choice of a charter school is often a life-changing option for them. If you would look beyond Stuart Hobson and Capitol Hill you might see that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Until Hill parents stop acting ridiculously entitled, selfish, and clueless, they will all end this way. I for one wish we could just ban discussion of Stuart Hobson and Watkins on here. Everyone who thinks it is doom for their snowflake - move to Arlington. Everyone who actually wants to give it a go - get to work.
a lot of families are doing just that. I suspect it's the charter boosters who feel obliged to bash anything and everything about SH, as well as Eliot Hine and Jefferson. It helps them rationalize their weak commitment to true public education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Until Hill parents stop acting ridiculously entitled, selfish, and clueless, they will all end this way. I for one wish we could just ban discussion of Stuart Hobson and Watkins on here. Everyone who thinks it is doom for their snowflake - move to Arlington. Everyone who actually wants to give it a go - get to work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Until Hill parents stop acting ridiculously entitled, selfish, and clueless, they will all end this way. I for one wish we could just ban discussion of Stuart Hobson and Watkins on here. Everyone who thinks it is doom for their snowflake - move to Arlington. Everyone who actually wants to give it a go - get to work.
a lot of families are doing just that. I suspect it's the charter boosters who feel obliged to bash anything and everything about SH, as well as Eliot Hine and Jefferson. It helps them rationalize their weak commitment to true public education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Until Hill parents stop acting ridiculously entitled, selfish, and clueless, they will all end this way. I for one wish we could just ban discussion of Stuart Hobson and Watkins on here. Everyone who thinks it is doom for their snowflake - move to Arlington. Everyone who actually wants to give it a go - get to work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club
Pretty much all of the Hill threads end this way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Most depressing SH thread either, nearly 300 posts and little to give us hope that the school would work out for our excellent in-boundary 3rd grade student (both math and ELA) in a Hill DCPS. Getting involved at the school doesn't sound worth it.
+1 welcome to the club