Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:size 14 is considered average in the US.
Not average in higher end DC neighborhoods...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You just proved my point. None of the images you posted support the "full butts, bellies, thighs" nonsense. The women in these pictures are height/weight proportionate, with small breasts and shapely legs. They are perhaps one size up from what is desired today, and their bellies are slightly rounded. But animate them, put them in today's clothes, and they would be imminently desirable. No one said anything about "protruding bones" model, most people realize that's a body designed to sell clothes, not attract desire.
The protruding belly was actually considered sexually desirable - it was a sign of a fertile gal.
It barely protrudes on the Greek statues. Barely.
Anonymous wrote:
By the standards of DCUM the Aphrodite of Knidos would be considered fat.
No she wouldn't. She's like a normal size 6, 8 max.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You just proved my point. None of the images you posted support the "full butts, bellies, thighs" nonsense. The women in these pictures are height/weight proportionate, with small breasts and shapely legs. They are perhaps one size up from what is desired today, and their bellies are slightly rounded. But animate them, put them in today's clothes, and they would be imminently desirable. No one said anything about "protruding bones" model, most people realize that's a body designed to sell clothes, not attract desire.
The protruding belly was actually considered sexually desirable - it was a sign of a fertile gal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Go look at statues of fertility goddesses and Aphrodites. They all have full thighs, bellies, butts. This American obsession with adult women looking like adolescent boys is insane. If you really want an adolescent boy, go get yourself one.
Overweight was a sign of prosperity because the wives of the wealthy held down couches with their butts back then. Poor people did not get sculpted or painted because no one was buying paintings of their poor wife. But if this helps you feel better about being part of the new overweight average good for you.
Anonymous wrote:Go look at statues of fertility goddesses and Aphrodites. They all have full thighs, bellies, butts. This American obsession with adult women looking like adolescent boys is insane. If you really want an adolescent boy, go get yourself one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just slept with my wife who is. 14. Assholes
In which states is being married to a 14 year-old legal? Are you cousins as well?
Anonymous wrote:I just slept with my wife who is. 14. Assholes
Anonymous wrote:size 14 is considered average in the US.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guy here. I don't know or care about womens dress sizes. Everyone looks better and is more attractive when they are fit though - and that includes us guys.
Disagree. I find muscles on women to be very unattractive.
Where did you read muscles?
"when they are fit though - and that includes us guys."
Fit is a euphemism for thin, muscles or no.
Not really...
You wouldn't happen to be "big boned" would you?
No I wouldn't. Are you?
No. I have toned muscles, though.
Very masculine and attractive provided you are male
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guy here. I don't know or care about womens dress sizes. Everyone looks better and is more attractive when they are fit though - and that includes us guys.
Disagree. I find muscles on women to be very unattractive.
Where did you read muscles?
"when they are fit though - and that includes us guys."
Fit is a euphemism for thin, muscles or no.
Not really...
You wouldn't happen to be "big boned" would you?
No I wouldn't. Are you?
No. I have toned muscles, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yup, 20 pages. It's considered acceptable to fat shame women.
I'm not attracted to fat women. Why is that an issue? Some people are not attracted to skinny women, short women, tall women, whatever.
It's a shame we are no longer allowed to have opinions in America
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guy here. I don't know or care about womens dress sizes. Everyone looks better and is more attractive when they are fit though - and that includes us guys.
Disagree. I find muscles on women to be very unattractive.
Where did you read muscles?
"when they are fit though - and that includes us guys."
Fit is a euphemism for thin, muscles or no.
Not really...
You wouldn't happen to be "big boned" would you?
No I wouldn't. Are you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guy here. I don't know or care about womens dress sizes. Everyone looks better and is more attractive when they are fit though - and that includes us guys.
Disagree. I find muscles on women to be very unattractive.
Where did you read muscles?
"when they are fit though - and that includes us guys."
Fit is a euphemism for thin, muscles or no.
Not really...
You wouldn't happen to be "big boned" would you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guy here. I don't know or care about womens dress sizes. Everyone looks better and is more attractive when they are fit though - and that includes us guys.
Disagree. I find muscles on women to be very unattractive.
Where did you read muscles?
"when they are fit though - and that includes us guys."
Fit is a euphemism for thin, muscles or no.
Not really...