Anonymous wrote:
Ah, I've got it!


When Trump cools down and reflects intelligently on the topic, he seems surprisingly weak because people are not used to this side of his otherwise brash personality.

So he can't win: if he's insulting and vulgar, he'll just have his fan base, insufficient to vote him into the Presidency; if he displays the least bit of rationality and courtesy, as he's done a few times during this debate, he will lose his appeal to the people who distrust the establishment and wish for a strong leader.

Anonymous wrote:Lester Holt needs to SHUT HIM DOWN.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I went into this debate undecided and at this point I'm leaning towards trump. I think he has a point about Clinton has had X number of years to accomplish these things and she hasn't.

+1

You two must not know how the government works.

Trump thinks being POTUS means you can do whatever you want. He has no clue that the POTUS has to work with Congress.

So? You think Clinton will be able to work with congress? LOL You know the republicans are planning to not let any of her nominates to the floor. This means she will not get anyone on the court.

Many repubs have stated this about HRC. That's why they are going to vote for her. So yes.

OTH, many repub congress people have come out AGAINST Trump. How many Dem congress people have stated they will not vote for HRC?

Anonymous wrote:"Is this a war-torn country? What are we doing?

WTF are you talking about, Donald... War-torn, third-world. Um, no. What a f*ing idiot. He has never been beyond 5th Avenue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are Trump supporters this stupid that they think that one person as SoS can impact tax policies? Or that one senator can do so alone? You know what it takes: a willingness to listen to the other side. Something many Republican congress people have stated that HRC would do; Trump, not so much.

Always an excuse or ten to explain a lack of accomplishment. And I don't support Trump.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I went into this debate undecided and at this point I'm leaning towards trump. I think he has a point about Clinton has had X number of years to accomplish these things and she hasn't.

when could she have accomplished these things?

she was a US Senator, so one of 100 and advocated for many of these things, but of course she wasn't running the show, and as Secy of State, her portfolio didn't include job creation, etc...

which things should she have accomplished and when?

and what makes you think he has any clue?

I don't know, you guys all promote her years of service as proof of her qualifications.

****WINNER****


And what has Trump accomplished?

Oh, come on... he inherited all of daddy's money, lost a lot more of it in his "business" than he would have if he put it in a bank, and made himself a cheap celebrity. This is presidential material, folks. Look at all the promise.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I went into this debate undecided and at this point I'm leaning towards trump. I think he has a point about Clinton has had X number of years to accomplish these things and she hasn't.

+1

You two must not know how the government works.

Trump thinks being POTUS means you can do whatever you want. He has no clue that the POTUS has to work with Congress.

So? You think Clinton will be able to work with congress? LOL You know the republicans are planning to not let any of her nominates to the floor. This means she will not get anyone on the court.

And it's Clinton's fault that Republicans won't do their job? Sound logic.

And, more to the point, while in the Senate she was actually known to work pretty well across the aisle. But, don't let facts get in the way.