Anonymous wrote:my sister witnessed a fatal farming machine accident that was very gruesome. it basically ruined her for forever. she literally can't sleep...ever. a few people lost their life that day, trust me.
Anonymous wrote:The park was scheduled to re-open today at noon. Verruckt will remain closed. How many people went to that park today???
Anonymous wrote:I don't know, it is a very sad story and I understand why it is newsworthy, but I really feel that it was wrong to show the photos of the slide with bloody water and the separate tarps covering his body and head. I understand that it is important for people to know about what happened, and the underlying issues about safety that it exposes, but I feel as though that photo violated this young man's dignity. I wouldn't want people looking at a photo like that of me if I died in the way that this young man did. I just feel as thought is was wrong to put that out there.
Anonymous wrote:my sister witnessed a fatal farming machine accident that was very gruesome. it basically ruined her for forever. she literally can't sleep...ever. a few people lost their life that day, trust me.
Anonymous wrote:
I want to feel like it would be okay for my kid to ride a water slide again. I know mostly it is, but I can't imagine the guilt his parents are feeling. Their kid's death wasn't their fault, but I'm sure they blame themselves irrational as it is.
NP here. Not irrational. If you are a Republican legislator and you vote for
deregulation, this is a foreseeable, direct consequence. No one should have to die,
but perhaps this Republican will grow a conscience because of it. Save your
righteous indignation for the folks that allow corporations to flout safety in the
name of profits.
And if you don't think cars, trains and airplanes are safer because of regulation--
why aren't you driving a vintage Pinto or Corvair?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Absolutely heartbreaking. And to think the boy's brother witnessed it. Pray this never happens to anyone else.
Obviously this is awful for the family, but after reading that article, I also feel really badly for the other two women in the raft. I can't imagine how you get past witnessingthat. I'm not going to quote the part of the story about it for the squeamish in this thread, but that's got to be nightmare-inducing for a long, long time.
I would be sue to cover the therapy bill! I was deeply disturb after witness a child getting hit by a car that hit black ice. I can't even begin to comprehend that level of PTSD!
What is this about??Anonymous wrote:Maybe he hit his head hard enough to snap his neck and cut his scalp or face badly. I hope he died instantly.
The money doesn't matter. I lost my youngest son in a fatal accident where damages were awarded to us. That money is blood money and Ive never spent a dime (other than paying our lawyer). I throw away the statement every month before even opening the envelope. Its an amount that could significantly change our lifestyle and I have no interest in a penny of it. What I want is my child. What these parents want isn't money. It annoys me that pages upon pages keep bringing up how much money they should be able to get, will be able to get, etc etc. I would spend the rest of my life working min wage jobs in the worst conditions imaginable if it meant all my children were living.
As much as these poor people don't want or care about the money, they won't be able to obliterate the Schlitterbahn corp. at $300k; which, I would think, would be part of their plan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:During the trial, will the Schlitterbahn lawyers bring up the fact that the dad voted to limit regulations and limit the cap?
There isn't going to be any trial. Schlitterbahn will try to settle to get this out of the news cycle ASAP, and with the cap they'll happily pay the maximum to do so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pp who looked up the bill and unless I am totally reading wrong, the cap DOES include punitive damages.
Agree. I think "non-economic" is just another word for punitive.
I can't find where I originally saw it clearly spelled out but unless I am totally mistaken, and I don't think I am, there is no cap on economic damages (I.e if you can prove you suffered $1 million in economic damages you can get that) but for non- economic damages, including medical malpractice and WRONGFUL DEATH, the cap is right now, since 2014, $300k period, full stop.
Anyone that ends something with Full Stop is a fucking tool. Good you must be super annoying to know in real life.