Anonymous wrote:The 1:1 institute is sponsored by Intel and other tech industries. didn't see a lot of numbers to support their claims. I don't want to say tech is bad or has no place in the classroom. Just want strong non biased research to support the claims instead of relying only on industry funded research. Of course, this will take time. Still, there is enough to suggest that the are going to be disadvantages to the 1:1 approach as well as benefits. It would be helpful to know b/c I don't get a redo with my DC's education.
Anonymous wrote:What about literature classes? Are students reading on Chromebooks for those sorts of classes? Just trying to get a sense of what the next few years will look like. It is already such a struggle at home to limit screen time. What about schools like Deal? Are books just not used anymore in middle and high school? Obviously, I'm out of touch!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, are latin parents happy with math instruction at latin
Latin parents are probably happiest with the fact that the administration cares about the kids and wants each one to reach his or her potential.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Latin does not have a very impressive list of college acceptances either. No idea of basis and DCI is too new.
Here is the link: http://latinpcs.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/WLPCS-College-Acceptances-2015.pdf
I actually think the list is impressive, relative to where most of these kids would've ended up if they attended their IB school. Isn't it primarily low SES? Agree though that it'd be interesting to parse out college admissions results for high SES kids.
I agree that this list is impressive. What is PP looking for? Harvard or Yale?
Anonymous wrote:So, are latin parents happy with math instruction at latin
Anonymous wrote:and thus starts Latin Bashing.
Latin parents do not want to say anything because they do not want more applicants to the school. Teachers are awesome and all students are treated equally.