Anonymous wrote:Why not give those who qualify for affordable housing a voucher to attend a school of their choice. If they are willing to put up with longer commutes for their kids then they can sent them to school in Potomac
Anonymous wrote:Why not give those who qualify for affordable housing a voucher to attend a school of their choice. If they are willing to put up with longer commutes for their kids then they can sent them to school in Potomac
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In small places where everyone can go to one or two high schools..not comparable to large county based systems.
You are missing the point, which is: Socioeconomic residential integration is achievable.
Why would you believe that when MoCo's recent history shows the opposite. You basically have the higher-income families hanging on to a few areas, a bunch of older homeowners without kids aging in place in areas with poor schools, and a county government more interested in abstract social policy than shoring up the tax base? If the goal is to turn both Whitman and Kennedy into replicas of Rockville, people might as well move to DC and just take their chances with Wilson.
Anonymous wrote:"The status quo, with virtually no FARMS rates or middle-income housing in the W school areas, is a policy choice. It could be changed by means of different policy choices.
One simple way to increase socioeconomic residential integration, with less cost to government, would be to allow people to have accessory apartments in their houses, without having to jump through a lot of hoops and meet multiple limiting requirements."
Agree that given that county policy has overly concentrated lower income living spots in certain areas, we now need to counterbalance that by requiring more in the areas with less affordable housing. But I highly doubt someone in Bethesda is going to have a poor family living in their "accessory apartment". Unlikely.