Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad I bought in a nice school district like Wakefield where this doesn't happen

This one?

Oh no brown people eating lunch with kids! At least they are all wearing clothes when their pictures are on the internet.

Well, there's that, although the evidence would suggest those teens found ways to gratify themselves that went beyond Snapchat.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad I bought in a nice school district like Wakefield where this doesn't happen

This one?

Oh no brown people eating lunch with kids! At least they are all wearing clothes when their pictures are on the internet.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Glad I bought in a nice school district like Wakefield where this doesn't happen

This one?

Anonymous wrote:Glad I bought in a nice school district like Wakefield where this doesn't happen

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just wait until pics of boy parts show up on your kids' social media feeds. All the harping that will go on then. . . .

My goodness. Makes you wonder why the moms (or teen girls) here are so blind to accepting any responsibility in this mess.

Anonymous wrote:

Sure, but you do understand that, while all involved may be prosecuted, the creators of the website would be likely to face more criminal charges than the girls because of the multiple actions involved in creating and circulating access to the site. The subjects in the pictures would face fewer counts because their involvement ended before the creation of the site (unless you are implying that the girls knew that a website was being created and then actively participated in the planning and organizing of the site). Whoever created the site participated in many more actions that may end up proving to be illegal.

That is not true in adult court. The person that creates child porn would be prosecuted more than somebody distributing it.

Anonymous wrote:Just wait until pics of boy parts show up on your kids' social media feeds. All the harping that will go on then. . . .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not like a woman walking down a street with a purse open and a thief takes her wallet! It's more that that the woman handed over her wallet and then was surprised by what the recipient did with the wallet.

more specifically, it is like a teenager handed over their wallet to another teenager, no adults involved, only under aged teenagers

Actually...one is 18!

Sure, but you do understand that, while all involved may be prosecuted, the creators of the website would be likely to face more criminal charges than the girls because of the multiple actions involved in creating and circulating access to the site. The subjects in the pictures would face fewer counts because their involvement ended before the creation of the site (unless you are implying that the girls knew that a website was being created and then actively participated in the planning and organizing of the site). Whoever created the site participated in many more actions that may end up proving to be illegal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So all you moms see nothing wrong with the girls posting nude selfies on social media? I wouldn't be surprised to hear that the girls sent them directly to the Dropbox themselves. Without the girls' naked pics, the boys would have been playing Call of Duty.

Another misogynistic attempt to blame the girls for leading the poor, innocent boys astray. One can't help but wonder if this is the general atmosphere at the high school involved in this case or just the attitude of a few individuals?

If you want the girls to take responsibility for their possible actions you need to accept that the actions of the boys were far more blame-worthy. It took time and effort to put this site together. The difference in the level of culpability has been noted numerous times. It does a child no favors to make excuses and blame others for their actions.

"It does a child no favors to make excuses and blame others for their actions." This applies equally to the girls.

Sorry, but it only applies equally if the girls both took the pictures themselves and then put them together into a website and circulated links so others could view them. At this time, there is nothing in the news indicating the girls took the pictures themselves and two boys are being investigated for starting, owning, and/or operating the website where 52 folders of pictures, 24 of which were labeled with names, were found.
It does not appear that the boys in question were dragged or forced in any way to keep, organize, and distribute these pictures. The people in the pictures were held up for embarrassment and have been placed in danger.
It is much worse to embarrass others and put people in danger than it is to do something foolish thinking someone is romantically interested in you. In terms of character, it is far worse to take advantage of another's vulnerability to put them in a position of embarrassment and possible danger.

Taking and distributing porn to a minor, even just one minor, is a crime. It isn't just a mistake, it's a serious crime and any of the girls who took nude pictures of themselves and sent it to a minor should also be prosecuted along with the boys. Any girls who were unknowingly photographed nude should be protected to the fullest extent possible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not like a woman walking down a street with a purse open and a thief takes her wallet! It's more that that the woman handed over her wallet and then was surprised by what the recipient did with the wallet.

more specifically, it is like a teenager handed over their wallet to another teenager, no adults involved, only under aged teenagers

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So all you moms see nothing wrong with the girls posting nude selfies on social media? I wouldn't be surprised to hear that the girls sent them directly to the Dropbox themselves. Without the girls' naked pics, the boys would have been playing Call of Duty.

Another misogynistic attempt to blame the girls for leading the poor, innocent boys astray. One can't help but wonder if this is the general atmosphere at the high school involved in this case or just the attitude of a few individuals?

If you want the girls to take responsibility for their possible actions you need to accept that the actions of the boys were far more blame-worthy. It took time and effort to put this site together. The difference in the level of culpability has been noted numerous times. It does a child no favors to make excuses and blame others for their actions.

"It does a child no favors to make excuses and blame others for their actions." This applies equally to the girls.

Sorry, but it only applies equally if the girls both took the pictures themselves and then put them together into a website and circulated links so others could view them. At this time, there is nothing in the news indicating the girls took the pictures themselves and two boys are being investigated for starting, owning, and/or operating the website where 52 folders of pictures, 24 of which were labeled with names, were found.
It does not appear that the boys in question were dragged or forced in any way to keep, organize, and distribute these pictures. The people in the pictures were held up for embarrassment and have been placed in danger.
It is much worse to embarrass others and put people in danger than it is to do something foolish thinking someone is romantically interested in you. In terms of character, it is far worse to take advantage of another's vulnerability to put them in a position of embarrassment and possible danger.