Anonymous wrote: 7:22, will you tell us which school you're talking about? I hear what you're saying.
At our school, LAMB, parents believe that the Montessori method provides us with a better tool to integrate the target language-speaking kids (not all of whom are bilingual on arrival! apparantly this is the case at YY) and English-speaking kids than traditional programs have at their disposal. I think we do a great job with the lower elementary Montessori program, but am not as sold on the "Piscataway" 50/50 immersion approach for all upper elementary kids.
Some parents privately wonder if YY didn't do the right think in creating a separate English-intensive track, mostly serving low-SES kids. There is no way in hell that a 2nd track would fly at LAMB, although I suspect that it would help kids who struggle with English more than the serial "Response to Intervention" (RtI) remedial inputs the program provides. A 2nd track would also help retain high-SES families at the Piscataway stage. Many LAMB parents know about the considerable flak YY has taken for moving to create the 2nd track, which nobody wants here in NW.
This spring we will graduate our 3rd group of 5th graders, too many of whom won't have scored proficient in English on the DC-CAS. Some have talked about pushing for a DC-CAS for Spanish proficiency, where our performance would surely be stronger overall than in English, but we are not meeting with much interest from the testing powers-that-be.
When YY PPs fuss about non-Chinese speaking admins, we wonder what planet you're on! No question that our admins wouldn't speak Spanish, or do a lot of direct outreach to the Spanish-speaking community. If the board must look to cities around the country to find the right sorts (with Montessori experience), and have them schooled them in the ways of running DC Metro area elementary schools, that's what happens.
.
Anonymous wrote:+100. Lord Hear our Prayer. Cantonese speaker, offered YY spot early on, didn't bite, stayed IB. Guessed that we wouldn't be able to speak freely, that they wouldn't get us, that we'd feel out of place. Lost sleep over concept of extended family strenuously objecting to our heading to school w/admins who don't speak Chinese. Though, seriously, if the principal had broken out in beautiful Mandarin to YeYe and MaMa (grandpa & grandma) I'm confident I could have won them over on the AA issue, employing shaming tactics. Whatever the case. Enjoyed big Chinese New Year party at MoCo heritage school with DC families as per usual.
---
DC at YY and we're happy although of course things can always be improved. I do wish that there were more native speakers but am a bit taken aback (well, not very as this has come up on other threads before) by the sense of entitlement that some of the Asian-Americans/dialect speaking posters. There is a Chinese outreach committee that is part of the Parent Teacher Association but honestly having read this thread (and all of the previous hugely long one), I think it would be almost impossible to satisfy these dialect speakers. They want to be courted, given preference, have an administrator who speaks that dialect... I think it would be impossible to satisfy all their demands. And it was truly disturbing to read some of the outright blatant racist remarks. The school will always be too diverse, too English-speaking, not enough Chinese-speaking admins for them... As I said on a previous thread, charters are started by interested individuals so the dialect speaking parents can band together to consider starting another one - YY is oversubscribed and there is definitely room for another.
Anonymous wrote:
I did find the LAMB discussion interesting. Wonder how they are going to pull it off given it's a public lottery. They can't have two bins (one for English dominant and another for Spanish dominant) like they use to.
Anonymous wrote:I'm no chinese wanting preference, but at open houses for half a dozen immersion charters this winter, I noticed that YY's was the only one where those in charge seemed eager to duck questions about natie speakers. Presenters and guides got defensive when parents asked how many bilingual children are in the school, and wouldn't answer. Same reaction when a mom asked which dialects the bilingual children and chinese teachers speak (she got, the law doesn't permit us to collect this data, which sounded paranoid). At Lamb, Stokes, MV etc. admins and parent volunteers answered similar questions by cheerfully offering ballpark estimates, and a little info about the communities involved (most of our Hispanic kids hail from Adams Morgan...we do outreach at these community centers). Whatever the history behind the defensiveness, for somebody new to the scene, it was odd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How far has it really reached? As far as I can tell, OP's real agenda was to complain about YY. The title and reference to Tyler are disingenuous--read her posts and you'll see YY was the only immersion program she was considering. It was either that or her IB school. I haven't seen anything particularly substantive about other schools/programs.
Perhaps, but then OP checked out 10 pages ago and the conversation continues. I'd never heard of Lamb's lottery games before I got onto this thread. They certainly provide food for thought. I'm left wondering where it's going for them, and if any other charter immersion schools will follow suit to push the crusading envelope/break the law.
Anonymous wrote:How far has it really reached? As far as I can tell, OP's real agenda was to complain about YY. The title and reference to Tyler are disingenuous--read her posts and you'll see YY was the only immersion program she was considering. It was either that or her IB school. I haven't seen anything particularly substantive about other schools/programs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Meaning, she knew no Mandarin when she started as the YY Principal, or meaning she did know some, and has learned more since coming on? I get that your assessment is she's not great on the tones, but is she conversational?
(From what I remember) At her previous school in Virginia she worked with the Mandarin program. I was under the impression that she spoke none or very little at that time, but has since picked up some basics. She is not conversational and could not present something like an info night. I speak very little Mandarin myself and can pick up that her tones are as flat as mine are. I'm not troubled by that in terms of how it looks to outsiders. What concerns me is that over half of her staff is Chinese and she can't understand them.