Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I hope I see it when the "McMansion" property owners sue posters who can't afford to be sued, of reputing their photos here. ALL SORTS of potential charges......
Didn't your mother ever tell you not to bother people with more money than you?
Gosh, no wonder you people don't get ahead. No brains. None.
You really don't understand the concept of "public domain" do you? When you put a house listing up and allow an agent to post photos for the listing via the MLS, those photos of your house enter the public domain. The simplistic version is that as long as the person who uses those photos is not making financial profit on the use of those photos, there is nothing you can do about them using it. There are no libelous damages that are incurred for describing some property as hideous.
Any actionable damages for the use of these photos is merely in your head.
I think the old adage quote from Abraham Lincoln applies to you: "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This. Is. Heinous!!!!!!!
Still laughing at the Monticello posting and whatever palace the other pic was.
Is this your house crazy person?
Anonymous wrote:
I hope I see it when the "McMansion" property owners sue posters who can't afford to be sued, of reputing their photos here. ALL SORTS of potential charges......
Didn't your mother ever tell you not to bother people with more money than you?
Gosh, no wonder you people don't get ahead. No brains. None.
Anonymous wrote:
I hope I see it when the "McMansion" property owners sue posters who can't afford to be sued, of reputing their photos here. ALL SORTS of potential charges......
Didn't your mother ever tell you not to bother people with more money than you?
Gosh, no wonder you people don't get ahead. No brains. None.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I hope I see it when the "McMansion" property owners sue posters who can't afford to be sued, of reputing their photos here. ALL SORTS of potential charges......
Didn't your mother ever tell you not to bother people with more money than you?
Gosh, no wonder you people don't get ahead. No brains. None.
Ooooh, I totally want to see this happen.
Please tell me how, exactly, you think this will happen. Like, what potential charges? How will they find the posters, to serve them? How will they prove damages? I'm DYING to know.
You are too stupid to figure it out. Far be it from me to explain it to you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This. Is. Heinous!!!!!!!
Still laughing at the Monticello posting and whatever palace the other pic was.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I hope I see it when the "McMansion" property owners sue posters who can't afford to be sued, of reputing their photos here. ALL SORTS of potential charges......
Didn't your mother ever tell you not to bother people with more money than you?
Gosh, no wonder you people don't get ahead. No brains. None.
Ooooh, I totally want to see this happen.
Please tell me how, exactly, you think this will happen. Like, what potential charges? How will they find the posters, to serve them? How will they prove damages? I'm DYING to know.
Anonymous wrote:
I hope I see it when the "McMansion" property owners sue posters who can't afford to be sued, of reputing their photos here. ALL SORTS of potential charges......
Didn't your mother ever tell you not to bother people with more money than you?
Gosh, no wonder you people don't get ahead. No brains. None.
Anonymous wrote:
I hope I see it when the "McMansion" property owners sue posters who can't afford to be sued, of reputing their photos here. ALL SORTS of potential charges......
Didn't your mother ever tell you not to bother people with more money than you?
Gosh, no wonder you people don't get ahead. No brains. None.
Anonymous wrote:There was a time when people moved to the 'burbs for light, fresh air, sunshine, better schools, regardless of how one defined "better".
Now, moving into certain neighborhoods with overly large houses, often a mishmash of every architectural style seen in the last 1,000 years, is a very good reason to move back to the city. Or a good argument for moving into a suburb with a strong hoa.
P.S. Love, love, love the term "snout house".
Anonymous wrote:If some of these owners get a less that warm reception in their new neighborhoods consider that their investment has probably really impacted current resident's property taxes. I know of some in close in neighborhoods who have seen their taxes double in the last few years due to the addition of outsized houses.
Anonymous wrote:There was a time when people moved to the 'burbs for light, fresh air, sunshine, better schools, regardless of how one defined "better".
Now, moving into certain neighborhoods with overly large houses, often a mishmash of every architectural style seen in the last 1,000 years, is a very good reason to move back to the city. Or a good argument for moving into a suburb with a strong hoa.
P.S. Love, love, love the term "snout house".