Anonymous wrote:Actually FWIW in my experience here in Tucson (parent here) the strictness of comps has reduced due to increasing size of enrollment and need to retain bodies for financial reasons. So one teacher told me that a kid he failed on the comp AND the re-take in 8th grade nevetheless was promoted to 9th grade. This student just recently transferred out of BASIS voluntarily after receiving straight Fs for a few weeks in 9th grade. Remember, charters earn money by keeping students enrolled. Many hardworking kids still drop out along the way either due to burn out or because they could get much better grades with less work elsewhere. The original plan mentioned by the poster who was part of the first BASIS class (holding back kids who fail comps) is no longer, in my experience, the norm at the Tucson campus though the policy remains on the books. Some students do voluntarily choose to repeat grades. Some parents will have their child take 5th grade in regular public school and then start BASIS 5th grade to gain more time to prepare.
Anonymous wrote:Actually FWIW in my experience here in Tucson (parent here) the strictness of comps has reduced due to increasing size of enrollment and need to retain bodies for financial reasons. So one teacher told me that a kid he failed on the comp AND the re-take in 8th grade nevetheless was promoted to 9th grade. This student just recently transferred out of BASIS voluntarily after receiving straight Fs for a few weeks in 9th grade. Remember, charters earn money by keeping students enrolled. Many hardworking kids still drop out along the way either due to burn out or because they could get much better grades with less work elsewhere. The original plan mentioned by the poster who was part of the first BASIS class (holding back kids who fail comps) is no longer, in my experience, the norm at the Tucson campus though the policy remains on the books. Some students do voluntarily choose to repeat grades. Some parents will have their child take 5th grade in regular public school and then start BASIS 5th grade to gain more time to prepare.
Anonymous wrote:The gamut runs from Stanford and Harvard, taking about 7%, to to state schools like UCLA, Berkley, UVA etc., taking about a quarter instate and 10% out of state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Good insights, 18:02. Question: in a city where testing in to a charter is a non-starter, how could the Basis model be adjusted to keep the hard-workers even if they can't pass the comps? Is there a way without 'dumbing-down' the curriculum? Just brainstorming here for fun because I'm not Olga Block but what if they took the students GPA into account along with the comps, so to capture the hard workers that don't test all that well? Or is the point that even if they stayed they would not be happy. And what about those who test in for aptitude but DON'T work hard, and yet pass the comps? (I'm picturing that in a personal way if you get what I mean). Is the real problem the culture of rewarding academic entitlement attitudes to the detriment of acceptance of differences?
18:02, glad to try to answer these questions. I don't think that Basis would be amenable to adjusting its model to accomodate "average" or below-average hard-workers. The idea is to show them the door and find those with the right stuff to replace them. Basis wants students likely to be admitted to colleges taking no more than around one-quarter of applicants, maybe one-third tops. The gamut runs from Stanford and Harvard, taking about 7%, to to state schools like UCLA, Berkley, UVA etc., taking about a quarter instate and 10% out of state. Low-income kids get a small break in these college applicant pools, so they get a small break at Basis, but nobody gets a big break. If a Lower School kid fails pre-comps in the middle of the year, a red flag goes up.
As the poster above said, there is a well-reputed "exam" high school locally. I lost a fair number of classmates to the place. I thought about going there, but the commute would have been a hassle for my family.
I'm not sure how to answer the "gifted and talented" question because I'm unsure what gifted means. My talent (math) is conventional and, hence, what Basis was looking for. If I were art or music gifted, or simply socially gifted, I wouldn't have stayed. Make no mistake, I graduated without loving the place. Yes, there were some fine teachers, but the mentality was too mercenary, and the focus too narrow, for me. We have world class astronomy facilities here in Arizona and that field of inquiry was my thing outside school. I don't feel like Basis helped me to pursue my this interest, astronomy not being an AP subject. Basis was simply a means to an end in my teenage life, not a school I would donate to as an adult (Stanford, yes!). I would have liked to have attended a school where nobody who tried hard and played nicely was weeded out.
Anonymous wrote:
My other question is to the other Tucson parents (or others if this thread has branched out to other Basis parents in Arizona). Why do you keep your child in such a high pressure atmosphere? Are you planning to have your child stay only for middle school? Why is the Scottsdale branch of Basis (and a few others perhaps), where one can assume the parent has a choice of good public and private schools for their child, still thriving in Scottsdale? Good marketing? It almost seems like the choice has been made to go with what you know, even with the negatives, rather than take a chance on another school and have worse but different problems. Not necessarily a bad choice, if you kids can handle the structure and pace.
Anonymous wrote:Actually FWIW in my experience here in Tucson (parent here) the strictness of comps has reduced due to increasing size of enrollment and need to retain bodies for financial reasons. So one teacher told me that a kid he failed on the comp AND the re-take in 8th grade nevetheless was promoted to 9th grade. This student just recently transferred out of BASIS voluntarily after receiving straight Fs for a few weeks in 9th grade. Remember, charters earn money by keeping students enrolled. Many hardworking kids still drop out along the way either due to burn out or because they could get much better grades with less work elsewhere. The original plan mentioned by the poster who was part of the first BASIS class (holding back kids who fail comps) is no longer, in my experience, the norm at the Tucson campus though the policy remains on the books. Some students do voluntarily choose to repeat grades. Some parents will have their child take 5th grade in regular public school and then start BASIS 5th grade to gain more time to prepare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: What you're going to see if you start in 5th grade is that many of the casualties in 7th to 9th grades will be hardworking kids. Why is this outcome better than finding kids with a good chance of doing well and keeping almost all of them? This is why I suggest that you talk to your pols. It might get you nowhere, but at least you could say you tried.
Good insights, 18:02. Question: in a city where testing in to a charter is a non-starter, how could the Basis model be adjusted to keep the hard-workers even if they can't pass the comps? Is there a way without 'dumbing-down' the curriculum? Just brainstorming here for fun because I'm not Olga Block but what if they took the students GPA into account along with the comps, so to capture the hard workers that don't test all that well? Or is the point that even if they stayed they would not be happy. And what about those who test in for aptitude but DON'T work hard, and yet pass the comps? (I'm picturing that in a personal way if you get what I mean). Is the real problem the culture of rewarding academic entitlement attitudes to the detriment of acceptance of differences?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Yes, need real alternatives in middle school choices. There's MS2 at Howard U, Latin, EL Haynes, Two Rivers, Paul PCS, Chavez Prep, all of them for college-bound kids.
Poster 18:02 again. I don't know about your public middle school choices but you must not have many good ones, or Basis DC wouldn't be attracting so many kids who probably aren't right for the set curriculum, and such defensive sounding parents.
If I were a DC parent starting out on this journey, or considering taking it, I might consider organizing fellow parents to educate politicians on the merits of selective admissions in the inner city environment. If the concept that "the politics here will never support what is fairest, kindest and works best" is allowed to rule the day from the outset, you're helping give empire building Basis a carte blanche to play cynical income-generating games in your city and others.
Tuscon isn't a big city. And yet kids who didn't come in with strong prep or aptitude tended to suffer cruelly at Basis. Those of us who were a good fit for the curriculum would place bets in the spring, with money riding on accurately predicting who would fail comps once, who would fail them twice, and who wouldn't be back in the fall. One August, I found that I'd won around 75 bucks from classmates for having predicted who would bite the dust over the summer with some accuracy. Were we kids to blame for such meaness when the culling encouraged survivors to look down our noses at those who learned differently? My local middle school wasn't great on math instruction, but it was a nurturing place and, looking back, I might have been fine there.
In perusing earlier posts, I noticed that many here appear to have come to the conclusion that all it takes to succeed at a Basis branch is discipline and hard work. If you leave, it's your own fault. Only half true. Basis is essentially offering a math gifted curriculum without screening for math giftedness, or strong foundational preparation for a lot of the kids. If Basis were starting in the early or mid elementary grades with screening, OK. What you're going to see if you start in 5th grade is that many of the casualties in 7th to 9th grades will be hardworking kids. Why is this outcome better than finding kids with a good chance of doing well and keeping almost all of them? This is why I suggest that you talk to your pols. It might get you nowhere, but at least you could say you tried.
Anonymous wrote: What you're going to see if you start in 5th grade is that many of the casualties in 7th to 9th grades will be hardworking kids. Why is this outcome better than finding kids with a good chance of doing well and keeping almost all of them? This is why I suggest that you talk to your pols. It might get you nowhere, but at least you could say you tried.
Anonymous wrote:Wow, these last couple of pages suddenly turned into yet another major disinformation campaign. It'snot Chinese-style "drill and kill" though there is a big focus on getting the fundamentals down. As PP pointed out, you can't "explore" and "be creative" in any productive sense without first having good core fundamental knowledge.
It's also amusing to see BASIS portrayed as a.) "public private" whatever the hell that's supposed to mean *chuckle* and b.) some kind of cash cow. Remember, they only get HALF as much funding per student as compared to DCPS, so if you consider charters to be such an outrageous waste of taxpayer money, then that makes DCPS DOUBLY as much an outrageous waste of taxpayer money.