Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Why are you part of a religion (or insert organization) where women are second to men? Do you believe that men are superior or in charge of women? If so, why?
What do you mean by second? Men and women in any aspect are equal but different. People fail to realize this fact. There are many things men cannot do that women can and vice versa. What is your religion? Allah gave women rights 1436 years ago when they were previously being bought and sold and buried alive, in other parts of the world
their existence was often questioned and put down time and time again. No other religion but Islam holds our women with higher regard in the entire world, do your research.
Yes, that's how Allah made us, men as the providers, protectors, and women the housekeepers,etc. This concept just changed within about 50-60 years in this country. Watch this...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvto1aEI_jc&spfreload=10
Another dawah-wallah with jahiliya horror stories but poorer English skills this time.
Oh my goodness.
There were long discussions on several other threads about all of issues. The response above barely reflects any of it. Let me try to represent that earlier discussion as fairly as I can and without loaded adjectives. Others, feel free to pitch in to correct me if necessary.
Women in Islam have different legal rights than men.
(1) Inheritance rights. A woman inherits 1/2 the share received by her brother.
(2) Divorce rights. Men can divorce women by repeating the word "talak" three times, although some Islamic states are trying to pare this back by adding required elapsed time/counseling in between the talaks. A woman can ask her husband for a divorce; if he says no, then she can go before a judge, who may or may not agree to the divorce. After a divorce, a man is required to support the woman (a bit like alimony) for three months, i.e. sufficient time to make sure she is not carrying a child.
(3) Testimony. A woman's testimony in financial courts is worth 1/2 that of a man's testimony.
Muslims argued, on those other threads, that these different women's legal rights are balanced by different responsibilities. As a result, they argued, westerners who think that women are "unequal" are viewing this through a "western linear" perspective. They argue, as PP did above, that men are the providers and protectors. As one example, when a woman is divorced, she goes back to her family and the men of her family support her.
Whether or not Islam gave women rights as they are bought and sold was the subject of extensive debate on those other threads. There was no disagreement that female captives of war were legitimately taken as slaves or concubines ("the women of your left hand"). Without drawing conclusions about the controversial part of that debate, suffice it to say that the debate centered on whether these concubines were freed upon pregnancy or upon the master's death.
There is considerable debate about whether Islam granted women new rights, confirmed existing (pre-Islamic) rights, or took away existing rights in various parts of Arabia. See, for example, Harvard's Dr. Leila Ahmad who takes the view that some/many women before Islam had considerable political power before Islam and opposed the religion for that reason.
There is also debate on whether the Quran forbade female infanticide, infanticide in general, or if that particular passage was an apocryphal and neutral reference to bad things that happen in bad times.