Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For her to give up custody breaks my heart. Poor woman. Even if she is sort of vapid and shitty to lose your kids must rock you to your core. She comes from such a solid family. I don’t know what happened. I have no doubt that Jim is no saint and he is so rich the power dynamic is way in his favor.

She didn’t give up custody. She lost custody. The current deal is likely the best she would get at this time given her behavior.

She needs to go to rehab and become the mother these kids need. Then she can petition for more custody.

Wrong. It says they cut a deal right before court. Megan agreed to the deal. She did not lose custody. It sounds like she accepted the deal. I don’t know why.

Nope. She had already lost custody. The judge was about to make it permanent. Her deal with Jim was better than she would have faired in court.

How the f do you know this unless you are one of them? What a load.

Tell us why she agreed to almost no custody?

Yeah if it was as posters say and the problem is Jim refusing to give consent for needed medical treatment and her only faux pas was giving a non prescribed medication - she would want that squeaky clean CPS report being spoken to in court. She would want the court to hear how he is the problem and instructing medical treatment. If her position is that she made one mistake in giving the child the med but that he had the diagnosis and had a script…Jim just wouldn’t consent to him taking it. She would have fought for the kids and been given a lot more time than she has now.

Absolutely!! And I’m going to say it again, I wish they did go to court so that the judge would have awarded Jim custody AND required the children remain in St Louis. He can be the more stable parent now - fine. But taking those kids from their school, friends, activities, and extended family is BS. They need that right now with the turmoil they are dealing with. And they needed occasional supervised visits with Meghan.

I guess since he sold the house in STL, the move was inevitable. But he still has kids in STL so I would imagine he would go back often. Without knowing what all is going on behind the scenes, it is hard to know what is best for the kids. If mom is frequently showing up at the school, is that permitted or not? Everyone in their current lives is watching this all unfold and I am sure many have opinions. Obviously maintaining a relationship with her is critical and I hope he puts the work in to be sure that happens but if moving actually gives them more stability and less ongoing daily turmoil, then it might be better for them for now.

This is such a complicated case as the relationship between them is so acrimonious. At one point Meghan had posted some of their OFW communications and basically an appointed Parenting Coordinator was scolding them both over their inability to even discuss a basic matter about the kids without it devolving into a hostile back and forth volley of insults at each other. It seems like coparenting will be very difficult.

There was rumor / gossip on the Reddit thread that Meghan had told people that she is leaving STL and moving to New York. No idea if that has any credibility or not.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For her to give up custody breaks my heart. Poor woman. Even if she is sort of vapid and shitty to lose your kids must rock you to your core. She comes from such a solid family. I don’t know what happened. I have no doubt that Jim is no saint and he is so rich the power dynamic is way in his favor.

She didn’t give up custody. She lost custody. The current deal is likely the best she would get at this time given her behavior.

She needs to go to rehab and become the mother these kids need. Then she can petition for more custody.

Wrong. It says they cut a deal right before court. Megan agreed to the deal. She did not lose custody. It sounds like she accepted the deal. I don’t know why.

Nope. She had already lost custody. The judge was about to make it permanent. Her deal with Jim was better than she would have faired in court.

How the f do you know this unless you are one of them? What a load.

Tell us why she agreed to almost no custody?

Yeah if it was as posters say and the problem is Jim refusing to give consent for needed medical treatment and her only faux pas was giving a non prescribed medication - she would want that squeaky clean CPS report being spoken to in court. She would want the court to hear how he is the problem and instructing medical treatment. If her position is that she made one mistake in giving the child the med but that he had the diagnosis and had a script…Jim just wouldn’t consent to him taking it. She would have fought for the kids and been given a lot more time than she has now.

Absolutely!! And I’m going to say it again, I wish they did go to court so that the judge would have awarded Jim custody AND required the children remain in St Louis. He can be the more stable parent now - fine. But taking those kids from their school, friends, activities, and extended family is BS. They need that right now with the turmoil they are dealing with. And they needed occasional supervised visits with Meghan.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For her to give up custody breaks my heart. Poor woman. Even if she is sort of vapid and shitty to lose your kids must rock you to your core. She comes from such a solid family. I don’t know what happened. I have no doubt that Jim is no saint and he is so rich the power dynamic is way in his favor.

She didn’t give up custody. She lost custody. The current deal is likely the best she would get at this time given her behavior.

She needs to go to rehab and become the mother these kids need. Then she can petition for more custody.

Wrong. It says they cut a deal right before court. Megan agreed to the deal. She did not lose custody. It sounds like she accepted the deal. I don’t know why.

Nope. She had already lost custody. The judge was about to make it permanent. Her deal with Jim was better than she would have faired in court.

How the f do you know this unless you are one of them? What a load.

Tell us why she agreed to almost no custody?

Yeah if it was as posters say and the problem is Jim refusing to give consent for needed medical treatment and her only faux pas was giving a non prescribed medication - she would want that squeaky clean CPS report being spoken to in court. She would want the court to hear how he is the problem and instructing medical treatment. If her position is that she made one mistake in giving the child the med but that he had the diagnosis and had a script…Jim just wouldn’t consent to him taking it. She would have fought for the kids and been given a lot more time than she has now.

There is a mother of a classmate of the boys posting on reddit. Her kids have also been in extracurriculars with the twins. According to her the kids are still in STL in school. Seems they will finish the term there then move for the new year. She has seen Meghan at the school quite a few times over the last few weeks at pick up time, including last week. So Meghan has been seeing the kids in some capacity. She said she has been aware of some ‘issues’ with Meghan this fall but nothing previously.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Jim post a holiday photo with one of his sons without pants? He’s way too old to be photographed without pants and put up on the Internet for all to see. Someone should call CPS on him.

On what platform? I just checked his Ig and nothing there since Thanksgiving and all with pants.

It’s online.

https://pagesix.com/2025/11/29/parents/meghan-kings-ex-jim-edmonds-shares-happy-family-photo-with-kids-after-rhoc-alum-loses-custody/

Those are pictures taken from the parents IG accounts, they aren’t recent. Still not a great idea given he is a public figure but that picture is posted in 2022 so it is at least that old. Hopefully he deletes it from his IG for the child’s sake. I doubt CPS would be up in arms about a picture of a 3 year old in a diaper.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For her to give up custody breaks my heart. Poor woman. Even if she is sort of vapid and shitty to lose your kids must rock you to your core. She comes from such a solid family. I don’t know what happened. I have no doubt that Jim is no saint and he is so rich the power dynamic is way in his favor.

She didn’t give up custody. She lost custody. The current deal is likely the best she would get at this time given her behavior.

She needs to go to rehab and become the mother these kids need. Then she can petition for more custody.

Wrong. It says they cut a deal right before court. Megan agreed to the deal. She did not lose custody. It sounds like she accepted the deal. I don’t know why.

Nope. She had already lost custody. The judge was about to make it permanent. Her deal with Jim was better than she would have faired in court.

How the f do you know this unless you are one of them? What a load.

Tell us why she agreed to almost no custody?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why did Jim post a holiday photo with one of his sons without pants? He’s way too old to be photographed without pants and put up on the Internet for all to see. Someone should call CPS on him.

On what platform? I just checked his Ig and nothing there since Thanksgiving and all with pants.

It’s online.

https://pagesix.com/2025/11/29/parents/meghan-kings-ex-jim-edmonds-shares-happy-family-photo-with-kids-after-rhoc-alum-loses-custody/