Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really interesting takes on boys and technology. I think he’s right about a lot but off on some things but I think his ideas are worth discussing. Are we failing boy? Have we put girls ahead of boys or have women just put their heads down and figured it out?

Excerpt:

“ …his stats tell a worrying story. In 1950, 50 per cent of men under 30 had children; now it’s 21 per cent (and 60 per cent of young men aged 18-24 still live with their parents). The downstream effects are startling: 1 in 3 men under 30 hasn’t had sex in the past year; 45 per cent of men aged 18-25 have never approached a woman in person (as opposed to online) to ask them on a date.

“No cohort has fallen further, faster than young men,” he asserts. “You ask me about the [Tommy Robinson] march in London? History shows us fascism breeds among sad, lonely, badly educated males who are most susceptible to conspiracy theories. Trump got elected because we have a young man problem. And you want to know why his vote went up among women over 45? I believe they are concerned mothers.”

“It begins with education. Boys’ slower brain development (the male prefrontal cortex matures later than in girls) means they quickly fall behind girls at school. What’s more, higher education is now prohibitively expensive, while manual jobs have disappeared due to globalisation and AI. Even for those working, inflation has devalued wages and housing is increasingly unaffordable.

The social contract is broken,” he says. “The promise that working hard and following the rules means your life will be better than for previous generations is gone. In that landscape of despair, the temptations offered by godlike technology, porn, gambling and conspiracy theories can be irresistible.”

Full article.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/scott-galloway-how-save-teenage-boys-gckntn7t9

Sorry, but this is BS.

Yea, technology changed. Those changes have also made it easier than ever to get ahead. Our grandparents would have killed for the opportunities we have now.

I became a single mom in 2019 with zero job skills. The career I had gone to college for was gone, and I had been a SAHM for so long my resume was worthless. I figured out what jobs had growth potential, got an entry-level position making minimum wage, and over 5 years worked my way up to making 6 figures. All while raising kids. Every free moment I had was spent on free education (podcasts + YouTube), and any extra money I made went to career development.

It was hard. Was it as hard as our grandmothers and great-grandmothers had it? Absolutely not. There were zero career opportunities for women then, and being a single mom meant poverty for life.

I just don't have much empathy for young men who want to complain life is hard when they've been handed literally every advantage and have the entire Internet, and all the free education that comes along with it, in their pockets. Mr. Beast was making several times more money than his parents by the time he was a teenager. Is every boy going to be Mr Beast? No. But if you work hard and take the time to learn the system, you can succeed.

Isn't it interesting that young white men are becoming increasingly more conservative, the party who believes everyone can succeed if they just work hard? Now that they have to work as hard as everyone else has had to do for decades they're mad about it.

I think this is a complex issue. I understand why white men feel left behind when our culture has historically put them above everyone else. There's a huge culture shift. It's no longer enough to simply be a white man. They need to step up and work as hard as everyone else. I keep seeing the reports of young men not being able to find a partner and the loneliness epidemic. Women don't have to settle for mediocre anymore. They want a partner, not a man child. They can make their own money and don't need to get married in order to support themselves. There's a reason conservatives are pushing so hard against abortion, birth control, paid maternity leave, etc. They need to make women dependent on men otherwise their chances of marriage will continue to decrease (until men learn they need to step it up).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really interesting takes on boys and technology. I think he’s right about a lot but off on some things but I think his ideas are worth discussing. Are we failing boy? Have we put girls ahead of boys or have women just put their heads down and figured it out?

Excerpt:

“ …his stats tell a worrying story. In 1950, 50 per cent of men under 30 had children; now it’s 21 per cent (and 60 per cent of young men aged 18-24 still live with their parents). The downstream effects are startling: 1 in 3 men under 30 hasn’t had sex in the past year; 45 per cent of men aged 18-25 have never approached a woman in person (as opposed to online) to ask them on a date.

“No cohort has fallen further, faster than young men,” he asserts. “You ask me about the [Tommy Robinson] march in London? History shows us fascism breeds among sad, lonely, badly educated males who are most susceptible to conspiracy theories. Trump got elected because we have a young man problem. And you want to know why his vote went up among women over 45? I believe they are concerned mothers.”

“It begins with education. Boys’ slower brain development (the male prefrontal cortex matures later than in girls) means they quickly fall behind girls at school. What’s more, higher education is now prohibitively expensive, while manual jobs have disappeared due to globalisation and AI. Even for those working, inflation has devalued wages and housing is increasingly unaffordable.

The social contract is broken,” he says. “The promise that working hard and following the rules means your life will be better than for previous generations is gone. In that landscape of despair, the temptations offered by godlike technology, porn, gambling and conspiracy theories can be irresistible.”

Full article.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/scott-galloway-how-save-teenage-boys-gckntn7t9

Isn't it the same what Charlie Kirk said? I think that is why he got a lot of followers among the young man because he pushed the narrative that it is a happy life if you marry young, have kids, raise family. The social contract is not broken. Young men still have the same choice. The problem is that a lot of them were raised believing that marriage and family is a bad thing. And now they are lost.

I think young women see marriage and kids as high risk/high reward.

I think young women know that they don't need a man unless it is to be an equal partnership.

Are you a bot? You fail to understand biology and emotion. Finding a late 20s straight woman who doesn't want a man and child is rare af. You know the human condition didn't change in the last 20 years, right?

Wow you are so out of touch. These women are NOT rare, they are the overwhelming majority. JFC do you ever go out in the real world or leave your moms basement?

I'm a 56 yo married man with three, grad school educated daughters that live in large east coast cities. I know more about this than you ever will. You just hate men because they find you repulsive.

Sounds like you aren't very close to them and never actually speak to them. Because what you are saying is not reality. Maybe they don't talk to you because youre such a misogynistic AH? You want to mansplain late 20s straight women to other late 20s straight women? Youre a fu&king joke.

Oh, I know you and your ilk hate me. I feel it at the grocery store, in line at Cava, etc. Fat ugly women have always hated handsome successful married men. I actually find it funny as hell. I just smirk at them.

hahahahahaha now you're handsome and successful, please stop. I can't see to type.

The best part? You know I know that you know it's true. Have fun continuing to be invisible to the men you wish you could attract. I do pity you. It must be so soul crushing to be despised by the very people you crave.

I know you need to tell yourself that to explain why no woman wants you. I'll let you in on a secret. No woman will have you because you're an angry, miserable, disgusting person who spews hate and glares at them for no good reason. We are repulsed by YOU, not men. I have a wonderful husband and a son, who are not so filled with hate that they need to spend most of their day yelling at women on a mommy forum.

Puhlease. I wouldnt let you blow me.

That’s cute that you think that there are people who might want to blow you.

This just gets funnier and funnier. My d*ck has been in the mouths of about 100 women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really interesting takes on boys and technology. I think he’s right about a lot but off on some things but I think his ideas are worth discussing. Are we failing boy? Have we put girls ahead of boys or have women just put their heads down and figured it out?

Excerpt:

“ …his stats tell a worrying story. In 1950, 50 per cent of men under 30 had children; now it’s 21 per cent (and 60 per cent of young men aged 18-24 still live with their parents). The downstream effects are startling: 1 in 3 men under 30 hasn’t had sex in the past year; 45 per cent of men aged 18-25 have never approached a woman in person (as opposed to online) to ask them on a date.

“No cohort has fallen further, faster than young men,” he asserts. “You ask me about the [Tommy Robinson] march in London? History shows us fascism breeds among sad, lonely, badly educated males who are most susceptible to conspiracy theories. Trump got elected because we have a young man problem. And you want to know why his vote went up among women over 45? I believe they are concerned mothers.”

“It begins with education. Boys’ slower brain development (the male prefrontal cortex matures later than in girls) means they quickly fall behind girls at school. What’s more, higher education is now prohibitively expensive, while manual jobs have disappeared due to globalisation and AI. Even for those working, inflation has devalued wages and housing is increasingly unaffordable.

The social contract is broken,” he says. “The promise that working hard and following the rules means your life will be better than for previous generations is gone. In that landscape of despair, the temptations offered by godlike technology, porn, gambling and conspiracy theories can be irresistible.”

Full article.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/scott-galloway-how-save-teenage-boys-gckntn7t9

Isn't it the same what Charlie Kirk said? I think that is why he got a lot of followers among the young man because he pushed the narrative that it is a happy life if you marry young, have kids, raise family. The social contract is not broken. Young men still have the same choice. The problem is that a lot of them were raised believing that marriage and family is a bad thing. And now they are lost.

I think young women see marriage and kids as high risk/high reward.

I think young women know that they don't need a man unless it is to be an equal partnership.

Are you a bot? You fail to understand biology and emotion. Finding a late 20s straight woman who doesn't want a man and child is rare af. You know the human condition didn't change in the last 20 years, right?

Wow you are so out of touch. These women are NOT rare, they are the overwhelming majority. JFC do you ever go out in the real world or leave your moms basement?

I'm a 56 yo married man with three, grad school educated daughters that live in large east coast cities. I know more about this than you ever will. You just hate men because they find you repulsive.

Sounds like you aren't very close to them and never actually speak to them. Because what you are saying is not reality. Maybe they don't talk to you because youre such a misogynistic AH? You want to mansplain late 20s straight women to other late 20s straight women? Youre a fu&king joke.

Oh, I know you and your ilk hate me. I feel it at the grocery store, in line at Cava, etc. Fat ugly women have always hated handsome successful married men. I actually find it funny as hell. I just smirk at them.

hahahahahaha now you're handsome and successful, please stop. I can't see to type.

The best part? You know I know that you know it's true. Have fun continuing to be invisible to the men you wish you could attract. I do pity you. It must be so soul crushing to be despised by the very people you crave.

I know you need to tell yourself that to explain why no woman wants you. I'll let you in on a secret. No woman will have you because you're an angry, miserable, disgusting person who spews hate and glares at them for no good reason. We are repulsed by YOU, not men. I have a wonderful husband and a son, who are not so filled with hate that they need to spend most of their day yelling at women on a mommy forum.

Puhlease. I wouldnt let you blow me.

That’s cute that you think that there are people who might want to blow you.

This just gets funnier and funnier. My d*ck has been in the mouths of about 100 women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really interesting takes on boys and technology. I think he’s right about a lot but off on some things but I think his ideas are worth discussing. Are we failing boy? Have we put girls ahead of boys or have women just put their heads down and figured it out?

Excerpt:

“ …his stats tell a worrying story. In 1950, 50 per cent of men under 30 had children; now it’s 21 per cent (and 60 per cent of young men aged 18-24 still live with their parents). The downstream effects are startling: 1 in 3 men under 30 hasn’t had sex in the past year; 45 per cent of men aged 18-25 have never approached a woman in person (as opposed to online) to ask them on a date.

“No cohort has fallen further, faster than young men,” he asserts. “You ask me about the [Tommy Robinson] march in London? History shows us fascism breeds among sad, lonely, badly educated males who are most susceptible to conspiracy theories. Trump got elected because we have a young man problem. And you want to know why his vote went up among women over 45? I believe they are concerned mothers.”

“It begins with education. Boys’ slower brain development (the male prefrontal cortex matures later than in girls) means they quickly fall behind girls at school. What’s more, higher education is now prohibitively expensive, while manual jobs have disappeared due to globalisation and AI. Even for those working, inflation has devalued wages and housing is increasingly unaffordable.

The social contract is broken,” he says. “The promise that working hard and following the rules means your life will be better than for previous generations is gone. In that landscape of despair, the temptations offered by godlike technology, porn, gambling and conspiracy theories can be irresistible.”

Full article.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/scott-galloway-how-save-teenage-boys-gckntn7t9

Isn't it the same what Charlie Kirk said? I think that is why he got a lot of followers among the young man because he pushed the narrative that it is a happy life if you marry young, have kids, raise family. The social contract is not broken. Young men still have the same choice. The problem is that a lot of them were raised believing that marriage and family is a bad thing. And now they are lost.

I think young women see marriage and kids as high risk/high reward.

I think young women know that they don't need a man unless it is to be an equal partnership.

Are you a bot? You fail to understand biology and emotion. Finding a late 20s straight woman who doesn't want a man and child is rare af. You know the human condition didn't change in the last 20 years, right?

Wow you are so out of touch. These women are NOT rare, they are the overwhelming majority. JFC do you ever go out in the real world or leave your moms basement?

I'm a 56 yo married man with three, grad school educated daughters that live in large east coast cities. I know more about this than you ever will. You just hate men because they find you repulsive.

Sounds like you aren't very close to them and never actually speak to them. Because what you are saying is not reality. Maybe they don't talk to you because youre such a misogynistic AH? You want to mansplain late 20s straight women to other late 20s straight women? Youre a fu&king joke.

Oh, I know you and your ilk hate me. I feel it at the grocery store, in line at Cava, etc. Fat ugly women have always hated handsome successful married men. I actually find it funny as hell. I just smirk at them.

hahahahahaha now you're handsome and successful, please stop. I can't see to type.

The best part? You know I know that you know it's true. Have fun continuing to be invisible to the men you wish you could attract. I do pity you. It must be so soul crushing to be despised by the very people you crave.

I know you need to tell yourself that to explain why no woman wants you. I'll let you in on a secret. No woman will have you because you're an angry, miserable, disgusting person who spews hate and glares at them for no good reason. We are repulsed by YOU, not men. I have a wonderful husband and a son, who are not so filled with hate that they need to spend most of their day yelling at women on a mommy forum.

Puhlease. I wouldnt let you blow me.

That’s cute that you think that there are people who might want to blow you.

This just gets funnier and funnier. My d*ck has been in the mouths of about 100 women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really interesting takes on boys and technology. I think he’s right about a lot but off on some things but I think his ideas are worth discussing. Are we failing boy? Have we put girls ahead of boys or have women just put their heads down and figured it out?

Excerpt:

“ …his stats tell a worrying story. In 1950, 50 per cent of men under 30 had children; now it’s 21 per cent (and 60 per cent of young men aged 18-24 still live with their parents). The downstream effects are startling: 1 in 3 men under 30 hasn’t had sex in the past year; 45 per cent of men aged 18-25 have never approached a woman in person (as opposed to online) to ask them on a date.

“No cohort has fallen further, faster than young men,” he asserts. “You ask me about the [Tommy Robinson] march in London? History shows us fascism breeds among sad, lonely, badly educated males who are most susceptible to conspiracy theories. Trump got elected because we have a young man problem. And you want to know why his vote went up among women over 45? I believe they are concerned mothers.”

“It begins with education. Boys’ slower brain development (the male prefrontal cortex matures later than in girls) means they quickly fall behind girls at school. What’s more, higher education is now prohibitively expensive, while manual jobs have disappeared due to globalisation and AI. Even for those working, inflation has devalued wages and housing is increasingly unaffordable.

The social contract is broken,” he says. “The promise that working hard and following the rules means your life will be better than for previous generations is gone. In that landscape of despair, the temptations offered by godlike technology, porn, gambling and conspiracy theories can be irresistible.”

Full article.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/scott-galloway-how-save-teenage-boys-gckntn7t9

Isn't it the same what Charlie Kirk said? I think that is why he got a lot of followers among the young man because he pushed the narrative that it is a happy life if you marry young, have kids, raise family. The social contract is not broken. Young men still have the same choice. The problem is that a lot of them were raised believing that marriage and family is a bad thing. And now they are lost.

I think young women see marriage and kids as high risk/high reward.

I think young women know that they don't need a man unless it is to be an equal partnership.

Are you a bot? You fail to understand biology and emotion. Finding a late 20s straight woman who doesn't want a man and child is rare af. You know the human condition didn't change in the last 20 years, right?

Wow you are so out of touch. These women are NOT rare, they are the overwhelming majority. JFC do you ever go out in the real world or leave your moms basement?

I'm a 56 yo married man with three, grad school educated daughters that live in large east coast cities. I know more about this than you ever will. You just hate men because they find you repulsive.

Sounds like you aren't very close to them and never actually speak to them. Because what you are saying is not reality. Maybe they don't talk to you because youre such a misogynistic AH? You want to mansplain late 20s straight women to other late 20s straight women? Youre a fu&king joke.

Oh, I know you and your ilk hate me. I feel it at the grocery store, in line at Cava, etc. Fat ugly women have always hated handsome successful married men. I actually find it funny as hell. I just smirk at them.

hahahahahaha now you're handsome and successful, please stop. I can't see to type.

The best part? You know I know that you know it's true. Have fun continuing to be invisible to the men you wish you could attract. I do pity you. It must be so soul crushing to be despised by the very people you crave.

I know you need to tell yourself that to explain why no woman wants you. I'll let you in on a secret. No woman will have you because you're an angry, miserable, disgusting person who spews hate and glares at them for no good reason. We are repulsed by YOU, not men. I have a wonderful husband and a son, who are not so filled with hate that they need to spend most of their day yelling at women on a mommy forum.

Puhlease. I wouldnt let you blow me.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really interesting takes on boys and technology. I think he’s right about a lot but off on some things but I think his ideas are worth discussing. Are we failing boy? Have we put girls ahead of boys or have women just put their heads down and figured it out?

Excerpt:

“ …his stats tell a worrying story. In 1950, 50 per cent of men under 30 had children; now it’s 21 per cent (and 60 per cent of young men aged 18-24 still live with their parents). The downstream effects are startling: 1 in 3 men under 30 hasn’t had sex in the past year; 45 per cent of men aged 18-25 have never approached a woman in person (as opposed to online) to ask them on a date.

“No cohort has fallen further, faster than young men,” he asserts. “You ask me about the [Tommy Robinson] march in London? History shows us fascism breeds among sad, lonely, badly educated males who are most susceptible to conspiracy theories. Trump got elected because we have a young man problem. And you want to know why his vote went up among women over 45? I believe they are concerned mothers.”

“It begins with education. Boys’ slower brain development (the male prefrontal cortex matures later than in girls) means they quickly fall behind girls at school. What’s more, higher education is now prohibitively expensive, while manual jobs have disappeared due to globalisation and AI. Even for those working, inflation has devalued wages and housing is increasingly unaffordable.

The social contract is broken,” he says. “The promise that working hard and following the rules means your life will be better than for previous generations is gone. In that landscape of despair, the temptations offered by godlike technology, porn, gambling and conspiracy theories can be irresistible.”

Full article.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/scott-galloway-how-save-teenage-boys-gckntn7t9

Isn't it the same what Charlie Kirk said? I think that is why he got a lot of followers among the young man because he pushed the narrative that it is a happy life if you marry young, have kids, raise family. The social contract is not broken. Young men still have the same choice. The problem is that a lot of them were raised believing that marriage and family is a bad thing. And now they are lost.

I think young women see marriage and kids as high risk/high reward.

I think young women know that they don't need a man unless it is to be an equal partnership.

Are you a bot? You fail to understand biology and emotion. Finding a late 20s straight woman who doesn't want a man and child is rare af. You know the human condition didn't change in the last 20 years, right?

Wow you are so out of touch. These women are NOT rare, they are the overwhelming majority. JFC do you ever go out in the real world or leave your moms basement?

I'm a 56 yo married man with three, grad school educated daughters that live in large east coast cities. I know more about this than you ever will. You just hate men because they find you repulsive.

NP wading into this:

we can all agree there is a certain cadre of women active on DCUMAD who hate men. As in: they absolutely loathe men, to the point they wish all men would disappear entirely. Much of the misandry comes from these few women here. They appear to suffer from mental illness.

Misandry exists in the same realm as reverse racism. As in, it doesn't. Hope that helps.

Misandrist.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really interesting takes on boys and technology. I think he’s right about a lot but off on some things but I think his ideas are worth discussing. Are we failing boy? Have we put girls ahead of boys or have women just put their heads down and figured it out?

Excerpt:

“ …his stats tell a worrying story. In 1950, 50 per cent of men under 30 had children; now it’s 21 per cent (and 60 per cent of young men aged 18-24 still live with their parents). The downstream effects are startling: 1 in 3 men under 30 hasn’t had sex in the past year; 45 per cent of men aged 18-25 have never approached a woman in person (as opposed to online) to ask them on a date.

“No cohort has fallen further, faster than young men,” he asserts. “You ask me about the [Tommy Robinson] march in London? History shows us fascism breeds among sad, lonely, badly educated males who are most susceptible to conspiracy theories. Trump got elected because we have a young man problem. And you want to know why his vote went up among women over 45? I believe they are concerned mothers.”

“It begins with education. Boys’ slower brain development (the male prefrontal cortex matures later than in girls) means they quickly fall behind girls at school. What’s more, higher education is now prohibitively expensive, while manual jobs have disappeared due to globalisation and AI. Even for those working, inflation has devalued wages and housing is increasingly unaffordable.

The social contract is broken,” he says. “The promise that working hard and following the rules means your life will be better than for previous generations is gone. In that landscape of despair, the temptations offered by godlike technology, porn, gambling and conspiracy theories can be irresistible.”

Full article.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/scott-galloway-how-save-teenage-boys-gckntn7t9

Isn't it the same what Charlie Kirk said? I think that is why he got a lot of followers among the young man because he pushed the narrative that it is a happy life if you marry young, have kids, raise family. The social contract is not broken. Young men still have the same choice. The problem is that a lot of them were raised believing that marriage and family is a bad thing. And now they are lost.

I think young women see marriage and kids as high risk/high reward.

I think young women know that they don't need a man unless it is to be an equal partnership.

Are you a bot? You fail to understand biology and emotion. Finding a late 20s straight woman who doesn't want a man and child is rare af. You know the human condition didn't change in the last 20 years, right?

Wow you are so out of touch. These women are NOT rare, they are the overwhelming majority. JFC do you ever go out in the real world or leave your moms basement?

I'm a 56 yo married man with three, grad school educated daughters that live in large east coast cities. I know more about this than you ever will. You just hate men because they find you repulsive.

Sounds like you aren't very close to them and never actually speak to them. Because what you are saying is not reality. Maybe they don't talk to you because youre such a misogynistic AH? You want to mansplain late 20s straight women to other late 20s straight women? Youre a fu&king joke.

Oh, I know you and your ilk hate me. I feel it at the grocery store, in line at Cava, etc. Fat ugly women have always hated handsome successful married men. I actually find it funny as hell. I just smirk at them.

hahahahahaha now you're handsome and successful, please stop. I can't see to type.

The best part? You know I know that you know it's true. Have fun continuing to be invisible to the men you wish you could attract. I do pity you. It must be so soul crushing to be despised by the very people you crave.

I know you need to tell yourself that to explain why no woman wants you. I'll let you in on a secret. No woman will have you because you're an angry, miserable, disgusting person who spews hate and glares at them for no good reason. We are repulsed by YOU, not men. I have a wonderful husband and a son, who are not so filled with hate that they need to spend most of their day yelling at women on a mommy forum.

Puhlease. I wouldnt let you blow me.

I thought you were married?

What does that have to do with anything?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really interesting takes on boys and technology. I think he’s right about a lot but off on some things but I think his ideas are worth discussing. Are we failing boy? Have we put girls ahead of boys or have women just put their heads down and figured it out?

Excerpt:

“ …his stats tell a worrying story. In 1950, 50 per cent of men under 30 had children; now it’s 21 per cent (and 60 per cent of young men aged 18-24 still live with their parents). The downstream effects are startling: 1 in 3 men under 30 hasn’t had sex in the past year; 45 per cent of men aged 18-25 have never approached a woman in person (as opposed to online) to ask them on a date.

“No cohort has fallen further, faster than young men,” he asserts. “You ask me about the [Tommy Robinson] march in London? History shows us fascism breeds among sad, lonely, badly educated males who are most susceptible to conspiracy theories. Trump got elected because we have a young man problem. And you want to know why his vote went up among women over 45? I believe they are concerned mothers.”

“It begins with education. Boys’ slower brain development (the male prefrontal cortex matures later than in girls) means they quickly fall behind girls at school. What’s more, higher education is now prohibitively expensive, while manual jobs have disappeared due to globalisation and AI. Even for those working, inflation has devalued wages and housing is increasingly unaffordable.

The social contract is broken,” he says. “The promise that working hard and following the rules means your life will be better than for previous generations is gone. In that landscape of despair, the temptations offered by godlike technology, porn, gambling and conspiracy theories can be irresistible.”

Full article.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/scott-galloway-how-save-teenage-boys-gckntn7t9

Isn't it the same what Charlie Kirk said? I think that is why he got a lot of followers among the young man because he pushed the narrative that it is a happy life if you marry young, have kids, raise family. The social contract is not broken. Young men still have the same choice. The problem is that a lot of them were raised believing that marriage and family is a bad thing. And now they are lost.

I think young women see marriage and kids as high risk/high reward.

I think young women know that they don't need a man unless it is to be an equal partnership.

Are you a bot? You fail to understand biology and emotion. Finding a late 20s straight woman who doesn't want a man and child is rare af. You know the human condition didn't change in the last 20 years, right?

Wow you are so out of touch. These women are NOT rare, they are the overwhelming majority. JFC do you ever go out in the real world or leave your moms basement?

I'm a 56 yo married man with three, grad school educated daughters that live in large east coast cities. I know more about this than you ever will. You just hate men because they find you repulsive.

NP wading into this:

we can all agree there is a certain cadre of women active on DCUMAD who hate men. As in: they absolutely loathe men, to the point they wish all men would disappear entirely. Much of the misandry comes from these few women here. They appear to suffer from mental illness.

Misandry exists in the same realm as reverse racism. As in, it doesn't. Hope that helps.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really interesting takes on boys and technology. I think he’s right about a lot but off on some things but I think his ideas are worth discussing. Are we failing boy? Have we put girls ahead of boys or have women just put their heads down and figured it out?

Excerpt:

“ …his stats tell a worrying story. In 1950, 50 per cent of men under 30 had children; now it’s 21 per cent (and 60 per cent of young men aged 18-24 still live with their parents). The downstream effects are startling: 1 in 3 men under 30 hasn’t had sex in the past year; 45 per cent of men aged 18-25 have never approached a woman in person (as opposed to online) to ask them on a date.

“No cohort has fallen further, faster than young men,” he asserts. “You ask me about the [Tommy Robinson] march in London? History shows us fascism breeds among sad, lonely, badly educated males who are most susceptible to conspiracy theories. Trump got elected because we have a young man problem. And you want to know why his vote went up among women over 45? I believe they are concerned mothers.”

“It begins with education. Boys’ slower brain development (the male prefrontal cortex matures later than in girls) means they quickly fall behind girls at school. What’s more, higher education is now prohibitively expensive, while manual jobs have disappeared due to globalisation and AI. Even for those working, inflation has devalued wages and housing is increasingly unaffordable.

The social contract is broken,” he says. “The promise that working hard and following the rules means your life will be better than for previous generations is gone. In that landscape of despair, the temptations offered by godlike technology, porn, gambling and conspiracy theories can be irresistible.”

Full article.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/scott-galloway-how-save-teenage-boys-gckntn7t9

Isn't it the same what Charlie Kirk said? I think that is why he got a lot of followers among the young man because he pushed the narrative that it is a happy life if you marry young, have kids, raise family. The social contract is not broken. Young men still have the same choice. The problem is that a lot of them were raised believing that marriage and family is a bad thing. And now they are lost.

I think young women see marriage and kids as high risk/high reward.

I think young women know that they don't need a man unless it is to be an equal partnership.

Are you a bot? You fail to understand biology and emotion. Finding a late 20s straight woman who doesn't want a man and child is rare af. You know the human condition didn't change in the last 20 years, right?

Wow you are so out of touch. These women are NOT rare, they are the overwhelming majority. JFC do you ever go out in the real world or leave your moms basement?

I'm a 56 yo married man with three, grad school educated daughters that live in large east coast cities. I know more about this than you ever will. You just hate men because they find you repulsive.

Sounds like you aren't very close to them and never actually speak to them. Because what you are saying is not reality. Maybe they don't talk to you because youre such a misogynistic AH? You want to mansplain late 20s straight women to other late 20s straight women? Youre a fu&king joke.

Oh, I know you and your ilk hate me. I feel it at the grocery store, in line at Cava, etc. Fat ugly women have always hated handsome successful married men. I actually find it funny as hell. I just smirk at them.

hahahahahaha now you're handsome and successful, please stop. I can't see to type.

The best part? You know I know that you know it's true. Have fun continuing to be invisible to the men you wish you could attract. I do pity you. It must be so soul crushing to be despised by the very people you crave.

I know you need to tell yourself that to explain why no woman wants you. I'll let you in on a secret. No woman will have you because you're an angry, miserable, disgusting person who spews hate and glares at them for no good reason. We are repulsed by YOU, not men. I have a wonderful husband and a son, who are not so filled with hate that they need to spend most of their day yelling at women on a mommy forum.

Puhlease. I wouldnt let you blow me.

I thought you were married?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really interesting takes on boys and technology. I think he’s right about a lot but off on some things but I think his ideas are worth discussing. Are we failing boy? Have we put girls ahead of boys or have women just put their heads down and figured it out?

Excerpt:

“ …his stats tell a worrying story. In 1950, 50 per cent of men under 30 had children; now it’s 21 per cent (and 60 per cent of young men aged 18-24 still live with their parents). The downstream effects are startling: 1 in 3 men under 30 hasn’t had sex in the past year; 45 per cent of men aged 18-25 have never approached a woman in person (as opposed to online) to ask them on a date.

“No cohort has fallen further, faster than young men,” he asserts. “You ask me about the [Tommy Robinson] march in London? History shows us fascism breeds among sad, lonely, badly educated males who are most susceptible to conspiracy theories. Trump got elected because we have a young man problem. And you want to know why his vote went up among women over 45? I believe they are concerned mothers.”

“It begins with education. Boys’ slower brain development (the male prefrontal cortex matures later than in girls) means they quickly fall behind girls at school. What’s more, higher education is now prohibitively expensive, while manual jobs have disappeared due to globalisation and AI. Even for those working, inflation has devalued wages and housing is increasingly unaffordable.

The social contract is broken,” he says. “The promise that working hard and following the rules means your life will be better than for previous generations is gone. In that landscape of despair, the temptations offered by godlike technology, porn, gambling and conspiracy theories can be irresistible.”

Full article.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/scott-galloway-how-save-teenage-boys-gckntn7t9

Isn't it the same what Charlie Kirk said? I think that is why he got a lot of followers among the young man because he pushed the narrative that it is a happy life if you marry young, have kids, raise family. The social contract is not broken. Young men still have the same choice. The problem is that a lot of them were raised believing that marriage and family is a bad thing. And now they are lost.

I think young women see marriage and kids as high risk/high reward.

I think young women know that they don't need a man unless it is to be an equal partnership.

Are you a bot? You fail to understand biology and emotion. Finding a late 20s straight woman who doesn't want a man and child is rare af. You know the human condition didn't change in the last 20 years, right?

Wow you are so out of touch. These women are NOT rare, they are the overwhelming majority. JFC do you ever go out in the real world or leave your moms basement?

I'm a 56 yo married man with three, grad school educated daughters that live in large east coast cities. I know more about this than you ever will. You just hate men because they find you repulsive.

NP wading into this:

we can all agree there is a certain cadre of women active on DCUMAD who hate men. As in: they absolutely loathe men, to the point they wish all men would disappear entirely. Much of the misandry comes from these few women here. They appear to suffer from mental illness.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really interesting takes on boys and technology. I think he’s right about a lot but off on some things but I think his ideas are worth discussing. Are we failing boy? Have we put girls ahead of boys or have women just put their heads down and figured it out?

Excerpt:

“ …his stats tell a worrying story. In 1950, 50 per cent of men under 30 had children; now it’s 21 per cent (and 60 per cent of young men aged 18-24 still live with their parents). The downstream effects are startling: 1 in 3 men under 30 hasn’t had sex in the past year; 45 per cent of men aged 18-25 have never approached a woman in person (as opposed to online) to ask them on a date.

“No cohort has fallen further, faster than young men,” he asserts. “You ask me about the [Tommy Robinson] march in London? History shows us fascism breeds among sad, lonely, badly educated males who are most susceptible to conspiracy theories. Trump got elected because we have a young man problem. And you want to know why his vote went up among women over 45? I believe they are concerned mothers.”

“It begins with education. Boys’ slower brain development (the male prefrontal cortex matures later than in girls) means they quickly fall behind girls at school. What’s more, higher education is now prohibitively expensive, while manual jobs have disappeared due to globalisation and AI. Even for those working, inflation has devalued wages and housing is increasingly unaffordable.

The social contract is broken,” he says. “The promise that working hard and following the rules means your life will be better than for previous generations is gone. In that landscape of despair, the temptations offered by godlike technology, porn, gambling and conspiracy theories can be irresistible.”

Full article.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/scott-galloway-how-save-teenage-boys-gckntn7t9

Isn't it the same what Charlie Kirk said? I think that is why he got a lot of followers among the young man because he pushed the narrative that it is a happy life if you marry young, have kids, raise family. The social contract is not broken. Young men still have the same choice. The problem is that a lot of them were raised believing that marriage and family is a bad thing. And now they are lost.

I think young women see marriage and kids as high risk/high reward.

I think young women know that they don't need a man unless it is to be an equal partnership.

Are you a bot? You fail to understand biology and emotion. Finding a late 20s straight woman who doesn't want a man and child is rare af. You know the human condition didn't change in the last 20 years, right?

Wow you are so out of touch. These women are NOT rare, they are the overwhelming majority. JFC do you ever go out in the real world or leave your moms basement?

I'm a 56 yo married man with three, grad school educated daughters that live in large east coast cities. I know more about this than you ever will. You just hate men because they find you repulsive.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really interesting takes on boys and technology. I think he’s right about a lot but off on some things but I think his ideas are worth discussing. Are we failing boy? Have we put girls ahead of boys or have women just put their heads down and figured it out?

Excerpt:

“ …his stats tell a worrying story. In 1950, 50 per cent of men under 30 had children; now it’s 21 per cent (and 60 per cent of young men aged 18-24 still live with their parents). The downstream effects are startling: 1 in 3 men under 30 hasn’t had sex in the past year; 45 per cent of men aged 18-25 have never approached a woman in person (as opposed to online) to ask them on a date.

“No cohort has fallen further, faster than young men,” he asserts. “You ask me about the [Tommy Robinson] march in London? History shows us fascism breeds among sad, lonely, badly educated males who are most susceptible to conspiracy theories. Trump got elected because we have a young man problem. And you want to know why his vote went up among women over 45? I believe they are concerned mothers.”

“It begins with education. Boys’ slower brain development (the male prefrontal cortex matures later than in girls) means they quickly fall behind girls at school. What’s more, higher education is now prohibitively expensive, while manual jobs have disappeared due to globalisation and AI. Even for those working, inflation has devalued wages and housing is increasingly unaffordable.

The social contract is broken,” he says. “The promise that working hard and following the rules means your life will be better than for previous generations is gone. In that landscape of despair, the temptations offered by godlike technology, porn, gambling and conspiracy theories can be irresistible.”

Full article.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/scott-galloway-how-save-teenage-boys-gckntn7t9

Isn't it the same what Charlie Kirk said? I think that is why he got a lot of followers among the young man because he pushed the narrative that it is a happy life if you marry young, have kids, raise family. The social contract is not broken. Young men still have the same choice. The problem is that a lot of them were raised believing that marriage and family is a bad thing. And now they are lost.

I think young women see marriage and kids as high risk/high reward.

I think young women know that they don't need a man unless it is to be an equal partnership.

Are you a bot? You fail to understand biology and emotion. Finding a late 20s straight woman who doesn't want a man and child is rare af. You know the human condition didn't change in the last 20 years, right?

Wow you are so out of touch. These women are NOT rare, they are the overwhelming majority. JFC do you ever go out in the real world or leave your moms basement?

I'm a 56 yo married man with three, grad school educated daughters that live in large east coast cities. I know more about this than you ever will. You just hate men because they find you repulsive.

NP wading into this:

we can all agree there is a certain cadre of women active on DCUMAD who hate men. As in: they absolutely loathe men, to the point they wish all men would disappear entirely. Much of the misandry comes from these few women here. They appear to suffer from mental illness.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Really interesting takes on boys and technology. I think he’s right about a lot but off on some things but I think his ideas are worth discussing. Are we failing boy? Have we put girls ahead of boys or have women just put their heads down and figured it out?

Excerpt:

“ …his stats tell a worrying story. In 1950, 50 per cent of men under 30 had children; now it’s 21 per cent (and 60 per cent of young men aged 18-24 still live with their parents). The downstream effects are startling: 1 in 3 men under 30 hasn’t had sex in the past year; 45 per cent of men aged 18-25 have never approached a woman in person (as opposed to online) to ask them on a date.

“No cohort has fallen further, faster than young men,” he asserts. “You ask me about the [Tommy Robinson] march in London? History shows us fascism breeds among sad, lonely, badly educated males who are most susceptible to conspiracy theories. Trump got elected because we have a young man problem. And you want to know why his vote went up among women over 45? I believe they are concerned mothers.”

“It begins with education. Boys’ slower brain development (the male prefrontal cortex matures later than in girls) means they quickly fall behind girls at school. What’s more, higher education is now prohibitively expensive, while manual jobs have disappeared due to globalisation and AI. Even for those working, inflation has devalued wages and housing is increasingly unaffordable.

The social contract is broken,” he says. “The promise that working hard and following the rules means your life will be better than for previous generations is gone. In that landscape of despair, the temptations offered by godlike technology, porn, gambling and conspiracy theories can be irresistible.”

Full article.

https://www.thetimes.com/life-style/parenting/article/scott-galloway-how-save-teenage-boys-gckntn7t9

Isn't it the same what Charlie Kirk said? I think that is why he got a lot of followers among the young man because he pushed the narrative that it is a happy life if you marry young, have kids, raise family. The social contract is not broken. Young men still have the same choice. The problem is that a lot of them were raised believing that marriage and family is a bad thing. And now they are lost.

I think young women see marriage and kids as high risk/high reward.

I think young women know that they don't need a man unless it is to be an equal partnership.

Are you a bot? You fail to understand biology and emotion. Finding a late 20s straight woman who doesn't want a man and child is rare af. You know the human condition didn't change in the last 20 years, right?

Wow you are so out of touch. These women are NOT rare, they are the overwhelming majority. JFC do you ever go out in the real world or leave your moms basement?

I'm a 56 yo married man with three, grad school educated daughters that live in large east coast cities. I know more about this than you ever will. You just hate men because they find you repulsive.

Sounds like you aren't very close to them and never actually speak to them. Because what you are saying is not reality. Maybe they don't talk to you because youre such a misogynistic AH? You want to mansplain late 20s straight women to other late 20s straight women? Youre a fu&king joke.

Oh, I know you and your ilk hate me. I feel it at the grocery store, in line at Cava, etc. Fat ugly women have always hated handsome successful married men. I actually find it funny as hell. I just smirk at them.

hahahahahaha now you're handsome and successful, please stop. I can't see to type.

The best part? You know I know that you know it's true. Have fun continuing to be invisible to the men you wish you could attract. I do pity you. It must be so soul crushing to be despised by the very people you crave.

I know you need to tell yourself that to explain why no woman wants you. I'll let you in on a secret. No woman will have you because you're an angry, miserable, disgusting person who spews hate and glares at them for no good reason. We are repulsed by YOU, not men. I have a wonderful husband and a son, who are not so filled with hate that they need to spend most of their day yelling at women on a mommy forum.

Puhlease. I wouldnt let you blow me.

I thought you were married?

Liars usually can't keep their story straight for very long.