Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%
Why would they do this?
Go private to admit whoever they want. Less entitlement from nova moms thinking that their average 4.0 kid should get in uva.
That didn’t seem to work for Harvard or other ivies
Why?
Harvard, although private, takes public funds.
Harvard doesn't get funding for students. It gets paid for services rendered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%
Why would they do this?
Go private to admit whoever they want. Less entitlement from nova moms thinking that their average 4.0 kid should get in uva.
Yet nova moms don’t feel entitled to Harvard.
That didn’t seem to work for Harvard or other ivies
Why?
Harvard, although private, takes public funds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%
Why would they do this?
Go private to admit whoever they want. Less entitlement from nova moms thinking that their average 4.0 kid should get in uva.
That didn’t seem to work for Harvard or other ivies
Why?
Harvard, although private, takes public funds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%
Why would they do this?
Go private to admit whoever they want. Less entitlement from nova moms thinking that their average 4.0 kid should get in uva.
That didn’t seem to work for Harvard or other ivies
Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%
Why would they do this?
Go private to admit whoever they want. Less entitlement from nova moms thinking that their average 4.0 kid should get in uva.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%
Why would they do this?
Go private to admit whoever they want. Less entitlement from nova moms thinking that their average 4.0 kid should get in uva.
That didn’t seem to work for Harvard or other ivies
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%
Why would they do this?
Go private to admit whoever they want. Less entitlement from nova moms thinking that their average 4.0 kid should get in uva.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%
Why would they do this?
Go private to admit whoever they want. Less entitlement from nova moms thinking that their average 4.0 kid should get in uva.
That’s silly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%
Why would they do this?
Go private to admit whoever they want. Less entitlement from nova moms thinking that their average 4.0 kid should get in uva.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%
Why would they do this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%
It would have to get agreement from the state and likely have to pay for all property and forego state funds. That isn't happening.
Exactly. UVA’s buildings and properties are owned by The Commonwealth. And the state legislature would have to approve 50% OOS.
Is it law stating 2/3 in-state? Some sources say it is a state mandate, other places say it is optional and UVA doesn't have to, but chooses to.
It isn't law. But if it varies significantly from this there would be funding and political repercussions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%
It would have to get agreement from the state and likely have to pay for all property and forego state funds. That isn't happening.
Exactly. UVA’s buildings and properties are owned by The Commonwealth. And the state legislature would have to approve 50% OOS.
Is it law stating 2/3 in-state? Some sources say it is a state mandate, other places say it is optional and UVA doesn't have to, but chooses to.
Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%
The University of Virginia is a public institution of higher learning guided by a founding vision of discovery, innovation, and development of the full potential of talented students from all walks of life. It serves the Commonwealth of Virginia, the nation, and the world by developing responsible citizen leaders and professionals; advancing, preserving, and disseminating knowledge; and providing world-class patient care.
We are defined by:
Our enduring commitment to a vibrant and unique residential learning environment marked by the free and collegial exchange of ideas;
Our unwavering support of a collaborative, diverse community bound together by distinctive foundational values of honor, integrity, trust, and respect; and
Our universal dedication to excellence and affordable access.
Anonymous wrote:UVA should just go private. Or increase OOS to 50%