Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m not seeing big lines and turn out today and I’m freaked
A lot of people voted early.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Eyeliner totally on point is going to wax you in 2028. You better hope JD and Tulsi don’t like each other because a JD / Tusli ticket or vice versa is going to obliterate anything the Dems put up. Trump is 1/10th the political talent that JD is.
I guess you are just trying to be funny?
Again, name a Republican who had a better debate performance than JD in a VP or Pres debate in the past 20 or even 30 years.
He was definitely a master at dodging every question without giving a real answer. I wouldn't say anything more than that.
Anonymous wrote:''Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not voting for either. It is frankly embarrassing that these are the two best candidates our political system could put up. Maybe in 2028 there will be a better option.
Nope—according to some insanely unhinged leftists, there won’t be an ejection in 2028![]()
![]()
![]()
There will be an ejection in 2028 if Harris is elected -- if she is not impeached sooner.
''Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not voting for either. It is frankly embarrassing that these are the two best candidates our political system could put up. Maybe in 2028 there will be a better option.
Nope—according to some insanely unhinged leftists, there won’t be an ejection in 2028![]()
![]()
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No line at my polling place. Completely empty, it was kind of eerie.
WHERE?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No line at my polling place. Completely empty, it was kind of eerie.
Hmm. It was the first time I had to wait in DC. A lot of women there with daughters in the 14-18 range. GenZ voter behind me registering, and another young woman first-time voter, so they rang the bell for her. My mom said she also had to wait in VA, which was a first.
Anonymous wrote:No line at my polling place. Completely empty, it was kind of eerie.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Iowa poll actually made my anxiety level come down. Selzer was one of the few who called it for Trump in 2016 and it gives me hope that this is not going to be as much of a nail biter as everyone was predicting….
Same. Hopefully she’s right lol
you do realize that if trump loses Iowa he will still win according to all the polls?
What if Harris wins PA, AZ. MI, GA. WI. and Iowa? It is quite possible.
Anonymous wrote:No line at my polling place. Completely empty, it was kind of eerie.
Anonymous wrote:I spent all last night and then all this morning in tears for some reason. Just scrolling tiktok and seeing all the amazing content. I guess the anxiety and feeling powerless.... anyone else?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Eyeliner totally on point is going to wax you in 2028. You better hope JD and Tulsi don’t like each other because a JD / Tusli ticket or vice versa is going to obliterate anything the Dems put up. Trump is 1/10th the political talent that JD is.
I guess you are just trying to be funny?
Again, name a Republican who had a better debate performance than JD in a VP or Pres debate in the past 20 or even 30 years.
I don't consider JD's nonstop slimy lying to be a good debate performance. Maybe you confused his arrogant smugness with "good." I don't.
No one has answered the question. Your choices are Trump, Pence, Romney, Ryan, McCain, Palin, Bush, and Cheney. And name a specific debate, not just that you like McCain or Romney better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, please don’t buy into the fear mongering rhetoric. Our country will be fine no matter who wins.
Are you sure?
Because Trump is sheer madness at this point. To wit, the article on his ‘patented’ weave technique. Read it, it is no longer comical.
Doesn’t matter. We have solid checks and balances in place. The President cannot destroy the country.
We've never had a former President desperately trying to dismantle the ALL guardrails before.