Anonymous wrote:The only reasons Winsome is behind in the polls is Virginia’s southern democrats are far too racist to allow a strong, accomplished, Black woman to become our next governor.

Haha oh boy.

The only reasons Winsome is behind in the polls is Virginia’s southern democrats are far too racist to allow a strong, accomplished, Black woman to become our next governor.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nope.

Amen to that. For those that may not know, this is the photograph she used in official campaign photos when she ran for Lieutenant governor.

I respect her service in the Marine Corps and don't have a big issue with her holding that gun. I still disagree with her on just about everything else though.

U.S. taxpayers quite literally paid for her U.S. Marines training, so she could defend us with a gun and give up her own life to protect yours, if need be.

She served and was honorably discharged from our armed forces, and now people are seriously criticizing her because she touched a gun we trained her to use?

OMG, people! Do you even listen to yourselves?

No "touched a gun", but posing with one as a prop, so as to appeal to a certain type of voter who gets off on such things.

You completely missed the point. She was trained on that gun by our U.S. Marines.

Ok, but why would she need that gun or skill set as an elected official? What message is she trying to convey in her campaign materials by selecting that photo?

- the same one Tim Walz conveyed when his campaign put out photos of him holding a similar gun?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What the heck is Larp?

It stands for Live Action Role Playing. Like little who dress up as fantasy characters for comic con.

Oh, okay, Kristi Noem. Gotcha.

Anonymous wrote:Sears would be the best. Youngkin was a response to the left progressive school leadership destroying the school system as a testament by the declining ratings and poor building states

Sears is an absolute nut job with extremist views and will never be governor of VA. She only won Lt Gov on Youngkin’s coattails. Youngkin only chose her in order to not look like the racist misogynistic elitist jackhole he is. Doesn’t matter who runs for Governor against Sears, she is unelectable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:T. McAuliffe could have chances if he doesn’t repeat the mistake of siding with teachers.

He was absolutely right about that. Parents were out of control and should have stayed in their lane. Our schools are still suffering because parents bought into that bullshit about how they should be able to micromanage what happens in schools.

I voted for McAuliffe and wouldn't consider voting for ANY R at the fed or state level now post-Dobbs, but you're nuts. Parents learned stuff during virtual school that made them realize they didn't actually know what was going on in schools. WTH do you mean "stay in their lane"? What's going on with their kids IS their lane. County-wide school districts that are not responsive to parent input are not helpful.

Wrong! At least 90% of parents are NOT equipped to make sensible, knowledgeable, unbiased curriculum decisions. Additionally, public schools by their very design are focused on the best curriculum, plans and processes for the majority.

One ignorant, biased parent burdening a public school with their personal views can easily screw up the education outcomes for many other kids in addition to their own. Parents who think they know better than professional educators can choose private, religious or home schooling. We must get these RWNJs out of the public schools because they are destroying public education for everyone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nope.

Amen to that. For those that may not know, this is the photograph she used in official campaign photos when she ran for Lieutenant governor.

I respect her service in the Marine Corps and don't have a big issue with her holding that gun. I still disagree with her on just about everything else though.

U.S. taxpayers quite literally paid for her U.S. Marines training, so she could defend us with a gun and give up her own life to protect yours, if need be.

She served and was honorably discharged from our armed forces, and now people are seriously criticizing her because she touched a gun we trained her to use?

OMG, people! Do you even listen to yourselves?

No "touched a gun", but posing with one as a prop, so as to appeal to a certain type of voter who gets off on such things.

You completely missed the point. She was trained on that gun by our U.S. Marines.

Ok, but why would she need that gun or skill set as an elected official? What message is she trying to convey in her campaign materials by selecting that photo?

“I’m a freakin nut job with poor judgment!!!”

+1. The white stockings alone seal the deal - she’s a nutter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nope.

Amen to that. For those that may not know, this is the photograph she used in official campaign photos when she ran for Lieutenant governor.

I respect her service in the Marine Corps and don't have a big issue with her holding that gun. I still disagree with her on just about everything else though.

U.S. taxpayers quite literally paid for her U.S. Marines training, so she could defend us with a gun and give up her own life to protect yours, if need be.

She served and was honorably discharged from our armed forces, and now people are seriously criticizing her because she touched a gun we trained her to use?

OMG, people! Do you even listen to yourselves?

No "touched a gun", but posing with one as a prop, so as to appeal to a certain type of voter who gets off on such things.

You completely missed the point. She was trained on that gun by our U.S. Marines.

Ok, but why would she need that gun or skill set as an elected official? What message is she trying to convey in her campaign materials by selecting that photo?

“I’m a freakin nut job with poor judgment!!!”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nope.

Amen to that. For those that may not know, this is the photograph she used in official campaign photos when she ran for Lieutenant governor.

I respect her service in the Marine Corps and don't have a big issue with her holding that gun. I still disagree with her on just about everything else though.

U.S. taxpayers quite literally paid for her U.S. Marines training, so she could defend us with a gun and give up her own life to protect yours, if need be.

She served and was honorably discharged from our armed forces, and now people are seriously criticizing her because she touched a gun we trained her to use?

OMG, people! Do you even listen to yourselves?

No "touched a gun", but posing with one as a prop, so as to appeal to a certain type of voter who gets off on such things.

You completely missed the point. She was trained on that gun by our U.S. Marines.

Ok, but why would she need that gun or skill set as an elected official? What message is she trying to convey in her campaign materials by selecting that photo?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nope.

Amen to that. For those that may not know, this is the photograph she used in official campaign photos when she ran for Lieutenant governor.

I respect her service in the Marine Corps and don't have a big issue with her holding that gun. I still disagree with her on just about everything else though.

U.S. taxpayers quite literally paid for her U.S. Marines training, so she could defend us with a gun and give up her own life to protect yours, if need be.

She served and was honorably discharged from our armed forces, and now people are seriously criticizing her because she touched a gun we trained her to use?

OMG, people! Do you even listen to yourselves?

No "touched a gun", but posing with one as a prop, so as to appeal to a certain type of voter who gets off on such things.

You completely missed the point. She was trained on that gun by our U.S. Marines.

And the Army trained Timothy McVeigh on explosives. So what exactly is your point?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nope.

Amen to that. For those that may not know, this is the photograph she used in official campaign photos when she ran for Lieutenant governor.

I respect her service in the Marine Corps and don't have a big issue with her holding that gun. I still disagree with her on just about everything else though.

U.S. taxpayers quite literally paid for her U.S. Marines training, so she could defend us with a gun and give up her own life to protect yours, if need be.

She served and was honorably discharged from our armed forces, and now people are seriously criticizing her because she touched a gun we trained her to use?

OMG, people! Do you even listen to yourselves?

No "touched a gun", but posing with one as a prop, so as to appeal to a certain type of voter who gets off on such things.

You completely missed the point. She was trained on that gun by our U.S. Marines.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nope.

Amen to that. For those that may not know, this is the photograph she used in official campaign photos when she ran for Lieutenant governor.

I respect her service in the Marine Corps and don't have a big issue with her holding that gun. I still disagree with her on just about everything else though.

U.S. taxpayers quite literally paid for her U.S. Marines training, so she could defend us with a gun and give up her own life to protect yours, if need be.

She served and was honorably discharged from our armed forces, and now people are seriously criticizing her because she touched a gun we trained her to use?

OMG, people! Do you even listen to yourselves?

No "touched a gun", but posing with one as a prop, so as to appeal to a certain type of voter who gets off on such things.

She should have added an American flag and a cross as props to lock in the MAGA vote.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nope.

Amen to that. For those that may not know, this is the photograph she used in official campaign photos when she ran for Lieutenant governor.

I respect her service in the Marine Corps and don't have a big issue with her holding that gun. I still disagree with her on just about everything else though.

I'm the PP. I too respect peoples' military service and my dad was a marine as well. But, unlike you, I have an issue with her choosing a photo of herself holding a rifle AS A CIVILIAN as her primary campaign photo. It's frankly bizarre. She can emphasize her military career all she wants in her speeches, written campaign materials, and interviews, but posing with an actual gun is a bridge too far for me. It would be seen as bizarre or extreme in most places on earth, not just here in the US among Dems.

“An armed man is a citizen; an unarmed man is a subject.” - John Adams

The John Adams quote that best summarizes how he might feel about Donald Trump’s actions, based on concerns about concentrated power and the need for institutional checks, is:

“The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” - John Adams

Sounds like John Adams would’ve had a thing or two to say about Trump‘s current accumulation of all powers in the hands of a single man given Adams’s fear of unchecked power.

+1

Live by the Jouhn Adams quote, die by the John Adams quote.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nope.

Amen to that. For those that may not know, this is the photograph she used in official campaign photos when she ran for Lieutenant governor.

I respect her service in the Marine Corps and don't have a big issue with her holding that gun. I still disagree with her on just about everything else though.

I'm the PP. I too respect peoples' military service and my dad was a marine as well. But, unlike you, I have an issue with her choosing a photo of herself holding a rifle AS A CIVILIAN as her primary campaign photo. It's frankly bizarre. She can emphasize her military career all she wants in her speeches, written campaign materials, and interviews, but posing with an actual gun is a bridge too far for me. It would be seen as bizarre or extreme in most places on earth, not just here in the US among Dems.

“An armed man is a citizen; an unarmed man is a subject.” - John Adams

The John Adams quote that best summarizes how he might feel about Donald Trump’s actions, based on concerns about concentrated power and the need for institutional checks, is:

“The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” - John Adams

Sounds like John Adams would’ve had a thing or two to say about Trump‘s current accumulation of all powers in the hands of a single man given Adams’s fear of unchecked power.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nope.

Amen to that. For those that may not know, this is the photograph she used in official campaign photos when she ran for Lieutenant governor.

I respect her service in the Marine Corps and don't have a big issue with her holding that gun. I still disagree with her on just about everything else though.

U.S. taxpayers quite literally paid for her U.S. Marines training, so she could defend us with a gun and give up her own life to protect yours, if need be.

She served and was honorably discharged from our armed forces, and now people are seriously criticizing her because she touched a gun we trained her to use?

OMG, people! Do you even listen to yourselves?

No "touched a gun", but posing with one as a prop, so as to appeal to a certain type of voter who gets off on such things.