Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this whole thread is a bunch of whacky lefty extremists whining about people they perceive as extremists on the other side. Total clown show.

It’s wacky and extremist to reject the blanket argument that women’s primary goal in life is to marry, have kids, and be a homemaker?? Wow.

It is wacky and extremist to tell any members of a religious congregation what they should or should not believe amongst themselves.

He used the word “vocation” which has a very specific, doctrinal meaning within the Catholic Church. Nobody blinked in that audience because they know exactly what he means by that word. My guess is that you are offended because you are hearing that word in secular coding.

I read your post and just feel sorry you’re so confined by regressive ideology. I am wishing you well that you might one day become a more open minded and well rounded person.

I thank you for your well wishes. I’ll pray that someday you may learn tolerance for religious minorities.

Is Catholicism a religious minority?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Lol a study of 3000 people done by BYU

NP here - it's not that he's right or wrong. The point is he suggests ALL women like his wife, SHOULD ONLY want to be a homemaker because that's the ONLY thing a woman should do - the assumption is that's all they are good for going and what they are meant to do.

He also said this to a room full of women who just received their degrees! Maybe he didn't mean it this way but it's what he said.

The context of him leaning in to be a dad and husband is only context and is beside the point if what he is saying about women.

I disagree completely that people ought not take seriously his ideas about women in society just cause he plays football. The overarching importance of taking him seriously is that he's spreading these beliefs that are toxic and he's a public figure who is high profile enough to receive attention. When he is broadcasting such offensive comments to ANY career oriented woman, he is demeaning them. It's not right and it's not something I want the next generation of men and women to feel is right.

He is such a douche. People like him have no imagination and no sense of reality either. You can be more than a wife and mother and still be both well. Is it harder when you have to also work? F yes! But you don't always get that choice and sometimes you don't want to be a wife and mom and that should not mean you suck as a human being. The fact that he has so many supporters and defenders of this speech is pathetic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good grief, OP.

His address is hardly unhinged. He is speaking to graduates of a Catholic College as a Catholic himself.
I understand you don't agree with his beliefs... and there are some things he said that I don't fully agree with, but he is speaking based on his religious beliefs. And, he didn't call the people who use IDF and contraception "disordered."

He said that these things along with abortion, euthanasia, gender ideology stem from the pervasiveness of disorder.
Big difference.

I doubt you listened to his entire address because had you listened - you would hear that he has some hard words for his religion and some of the leaders of the Catholic Church.

Difference without a distinction.

Hey folks who use birth control and IVF -this conservative Catholics thinks that your use “stems from the pervasiveness of disorder.” Along with his other hard right laundry list of culture war grievances.

He is a dangerous extremist.

This OP and thread are a great example of exactly why LWNJs are mocked so roundly. Classic.

LOLOLOL

This religious crank is a great example of exactly why right-wing extremists are mocked so roundly. Classic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So this whole thread is a bunch of whacky lefty extremists whining about people they perceive as extremists on the other side. Total clown show.

It’s wacky and extremist to reject the blanket argument that women’s primary goal in life is to marry, have kids, and be a homemaker?? Wow.

It is wacky and extremist to tell any members of a religious congregation what they should or should not believe amongst themselves.

He used the word “vocation” which has a very specific, doctrinal meaning within the Catholic Church. Nobody blinked in that audience because they know exactly what he means by that word. My guess is that you are offended because you are hearing that word in secular coding.

I read your post and just feel sorry you’re so confined by regressive ideology. I am wishing you well that you might one day become a more open minded and well rounded person.

I thank you for your well wishes. I’ll pray that someday you may learn tolerance for religious minorities.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I get some people are all about the woman staying demure and a man leading the family. Some women enjoy being housewife and that is good for them. No prob with any of this kind of thinking.

BUT what he said totally demeans women. He said his wife’s life did not start or meant nothing until she started being a wife and mother. As a woman I take great offense with this statement. I take great offense at the way he expressed what he feels women should be. It’s one thing to suggest someone can live one way, it’s another to suggest there is only one way to live that’s right.

I think he is such a blatantly offensive man whose mom has to be losing her mind!!

WTf? In 20 min he managed to offend most people. It’s not about his views, it’s about how he expressed them.

You are putting words in his mouth. He never said his wife's life "meant nothing." He said that SHE would be the first to tell you that her life truly started when she started "living her vocation as a wife and mother." For most women who have children - this is true, whether they admit it or not.
I remember the old adage that nobody on their death bed wishes they had spent more time at the office. The important thing is relationships - family and friends. Raising children IS the most important job in the world.
I worked outside the home when my children were young. I won many awards. But, today - those awards mean nothing. What is important is that my children are grown, productive people in the world who have strong relationships with THEIR spouses and are raising happy, well adjusted children. This doesn't happen by accident. It is a result of having parents who spend time with them when they are young and serve as good role models.
And, he never demeaned women who choose to work outside the home. Instead, he relishes the idea that his wife love and is good at the role of homemaker. And, that she makes him a better father and husband by keeping him focused on what is important - family.

Are you saying the same thing about men, that they first start to live when they become husbands and fathers? Why isn’t homemaking their greatest goal? Surely it should be something men can and should aspire to.

And what do you say to those who choose the celibate religious life? Are they not living?

Did you hear what he said.....

"I have leaned into my vocation as a husband and father and as a man."

"To the gentlemen here today - part of what plagues our society is this lie that has been told to you that men are not necessary in the home or in our communities."

He credits his wife with making sure that he puts family first ahead of his career.

Contrary to the many posts on this board - there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with traditional gender roles, with a focus on family and children, and women serving as homemakers as their primary vocation.

+100
And even women who work outside the home - pretty sure most would say that raising their children is their highest vocation and thing they're most proud of, regardless of their career. Frankly, if a parent *didn't* feel that way, that's pretty sad.

It’s not that so much. It’s that her life “had no
meaning” before children. But his did, apparently. We can consider raising our children our most important role AND want more to our lives than parenthood.

Anonymous wrote:
Well why didn’t you come out in force to elect a different candidate then? Trump has received the majority of votes in the GOP primaries. Contradicts what you assert.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Lol a study of 3000 people done by BYU

Anonymous wrote:He is a christofascist. Period.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our society doesn’t need more mothers. It needs more workers.

How wrong you are.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/24/health/us-birth-rate-decline-2023-cdc/index.html
https://apnews.com/article/how-many-babies-are-born-us-25d99f438645908e5ed6ae29d3914b89
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2024/20240525.htm

Maybe the Rs should stop attacking women if they want more to reproduce.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our society doesn’t need more mothers. It needs more workers.

How wrong you are.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/24/health/us-birth-rate-decline-2023-cdc/index.html
https://apnews.com/article/how-many-babies-are-born-us-25d99f438645908e5ed6ae29d3914b89
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2024/20240525.htm

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I get some people are all about the woman staying demure and a man leading the family. Some women enjoy being housewife and that is good for them. No prob with any of this kind of thinking.

BUT what he said totally demeans women. He said his wife’s life did not start or meant nothing until she started being a wife and mother. As a woman I take great offense with this statement. I take great offense at the way he expressed what he feels women should be. It’s one thing to suggest someone can live one way, it’s another to suggest there is only one way to live that’s right.

I think he is such a blatantly offensive man whose mom has to be losing her mind!!

WTf? In 20 min he managed to offend most people. It’s not about his views, it’s about how he expressed them.

You are putting words in his mouth. He never said his wife's life "meant nothing." He said that SHE would be the first to tell you that her life truly started when she started "living her vocation as a wife and mother." For most women who have children - this is true, whether they admit it or not.
I remember the old adage that nobody on their death bed wishes they had spent more time at the office. The important thing is relationships - family and friends. Raising children IS the most important job in the world.
I worked outside the home when my children were young. I won many awards. But, today - those awards mean nothing. What is important is that my children are grown, productive people in the world who have strong relationships with THEIR spouses and are raising happy, well adjusted children. This doesn't happen by accident. It is a result of having parents who spend time with them when they are young and serve as good role models.
And, he never demeaned women who choose to work outside the home. Instead, he relishes the idea that his wife love and is good at the role of homemaker. And, that she makes him a better father and husband by keeping him focused on what is important - family.

Are you saying the same thing about men, that they first start to live when they become husbands and fathers? Why isn’t homemaking their greatest goal? Surely it should be something men can and should aspire to.

And what do you say to those who choose the celibate religious life? Are they not living?

Did you hear what he said.....

"I have leaned into my vocation as a husband and father and as a man."

"To the gentlemen here today - part of what plagues our society is this lie that has been told to you that men are not necessary in the home or in our communities."

He credits his wife with making sure that he puts family first ahead of his career.

Contrary to the many posts on this board - there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with traditional gender roles, with a focus on family and children, and women serving as homemakers as their primary vocation.

+100
And even women who work outside the home - pretty sure most would say that raising their children is their highest vocation and thing they're most proud of, regardless of their career. Frankly, if a parent *didn't* feel that way, that's pretty sad.

Anonymous wrote:Our society doesn’t need more mothers. It needs more workers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I get some people are all about the woman staying demure and a man leading the family. Some women enjoy being housewife and that is good for them. No prob with any of this kind of thinking.

BUT what he said totally demeans women. He said his wife’s life did not start or meant nothing until she started being a wife and mother. As a woman I take great offense with this statement. I take great offense at the way he expressed what he feels women should be. It’s one thing to suggest someone can live one way, it’s another to suggest there is only one way to live that’s right.

I think he is such a blatantly offensive man whose mom has to be losing her mind!!

WTf? In 20 min he managed to offend most people. It’s not about his views, it’s about how he expressed them.

You are putting words in his mouth. He never said his wife's life "meant nothing." He said that SHE would be the first to tell you that her life truly started when she started "living her vocation as a wife and mother." For most women who have children - this is true, whether they admit it or not.
I remember the old adage that nobody on their death bed wishes they had spent more time at the office. The important thing is relationships - family and friends. Raising children IS the most important job in the world.
I worked outside the home when my children were young. I won many awards. But, today - those awards mean nothing. What is important is that my children are grown, productive people in the world who have strong relationships with THEIR spouses and are raising happy, well adjusted children. This doesn't happen by accident. It is a result of having parents who spend time with them when they are young and serve as good role models.
And, he never demeaned women who choose to work outside the home. Instead, he relishes the idea that his wife love and is good at the role of homemaker. And, that she makes him a better father and husband by keeping him focused on what is important - family.

Are you saying the same thing about men, that they first start to live when they become husbands and fathers? Why isn’t homemaking their greatest goal? Surely it should be something men can and should aspire to.

And what do you say to those who choose the celibate religious life? Are they not living?

Did you hear what he said.....

"I have leaned into my vocation as a husband and father and as a man."

"To the gentlemen here today - part of what plagues our society is this lie that has been told to you that men are not necessary in the home or in our communities."

He credits his wife with making sure that he puts family first ahead of his career.

Contrary to the many posts on this board - there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with traditional gender roles, with a focus on family and children, and women serving as homemakers as their primary vocation.