Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the Republicans ignoring the new info: Trump is all over the Epstein files.

+1

at least he was awake.

Yeah, but he very likely was not sober. Those 3am tweets-from-the-toilet were unhinged and have the potential to cause an international security incident while our country is asleep. Pretty clear that those crazy late night Tweets are when the meds are not working correctly (or he took too many).

President Six O'Clock Supper? No harm, no foul.

people drink all the time and he was single doing the time, so idc who he dates

There is no “dating” a trafficked child, you weirdo.

Anonymous wrote:Jan 4, 2024

New Epstein Documents Unsealed: Bill Clinton ‘Threatened’ Vanity Fair Over Sex Trafficking Coverage, Email Alleges

[…]

Honey are you slow or something? If Clinton is guilty, let him face the courts. Just like Trump should if he’s the child rapist he’s accused of being.

Why can’t you form a declarative sentence saying you would quit supporting Trump if this were true? Is it because it doesn’t bother you? You think raping children is acceptable? That’s what I’m seeing here when Republicans keep bringing up Bill Clinton who 1) is no longer in or running for office and 2) we’ve all said that if he’s guilty, he should face all the consequences. I’m opposed to crimes against children. People who commit them are bad people and should be shunned from polite society.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the Republicans ignoring the new info: Trump is all over the Epstein files.

+1

at least he was awake.

Yeah, but he very likely was not sober. Those 3am tweets-from-the-toilet were unhinged and have the potential to cause an international security incident while our country is asleep. Pretty clear that those crazy late night Tweets are when the meds are not working correctly (or he took too many).

President Six O'Clock Supper? No harm, no foul.

people drink all the time and he was single doing the time, so idc who he dates

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the Republicans ignoring the new info: Trump is all over the Epstein files.

+1

at least he was awake.

Yeah, but he very likely was not sober. Those 3am tweets-from-the-toilet were unhinged and have the potential to cause an international security incident while our country is asleep. Pretty clear that those crazy late night Tweets are when the meds are not working correctly (or he took too many).

President Six O'Clock Supper? No harm, no foul.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the Republicans ignoring the new info: Trump is all over the Epstein files.

+1

at least he was awake.

no one cares that why we are not talking about it.

Jan 4, 2024

New Epstein Documents Unsealed: Bill Clinton ‘Threatened’ Vanity Fair Over Sex Trafficking Coverage, Email Alleges

https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2024/01/04/new-epstein-documents-unsealed-bill-clinton-threatened-vanity-fair-over-sex-trafficking-coverage-email-alleges/

An allegation that former President Bill Clinton “threatened” Vanity Fair magazine to kill articles about sex trafficking allegations involving Jeffrey Epstein highlighted a second tranche of unsealed documents released Thursday, a day after he was named alongside figures like Prince Andrew, law professor Alan Dershowitz and magician David Copperfield as associates of the late convicted sex offender (all listed have denied any suggestion of wrongdoing).


KEY FACTS

The unsealed names mentioned in the initial tranche of documents Wednesday included prominent figures like Clinton, Dershowitz, Prince Andrew and Copperfield—all of whom have denied wrongdoing in their associations with Epstein.

The following mentions are from documents unsealed Thursday, which previously had much information, including the names of Epstein’s alleged victims and associates, redacted.

Former President Bill Clinton: “When I was doing some research into [Vanity Fair] yesterday, it does concern me what they could want to write about me considering that B.Clinton walked into [Vanity Fair] and threatened them not to write sex-traffic[k]ing articles about his good friend J.E.” (Attachment 2, email sent by Virginia Giuffre to journalist and friend Sharon Churcher)
Representatives for Clinton and Vanity Fair did not immediately respond to Forbes’ request for comment, though Graydon Carter, editor of Vanity Fair from 1992 to 2017, told CNN the incident “categorically did not happen.”

“Traveled with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell and may have information about Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual trafficking conduct.” (Attachment 5, a witness request made by Giuffre in a disclosure)

Though Clinton has publicly acknowledged his connection to Epstein and once praised the disgraced financier’s intellect, philanthropic endeavors and financial know-how, the former president has strongly denied having a close relationship with him and having any knowledge of his crimes.


Giuffre in a disclosure also requested “All photos of Ghislaine Maxwell at Chelsea Clinton’s wedding.” (Attachment 5, one of several relevant documents requested by Giuffre)


The second round of names associated with Epstein were unsealed Thursday as part of a settled 2015 defamation case between alleged victim Giuffre and Epstein associate Maxwell. The first set of unsealed names released Wednesday also mentioned people such as Michael Jackson, former President Donald Trump, billionaire Highbridge Capital co-founder Glenn Dubin and Thomas Pritzker, the billionaire Pritzker heir and executive chairman of Hyatt Hotels. However, Clinton, Prince Andrew and Dershowitz were mentioned the most out of the prominent figures noted in the documents. In one attachment, Epstein accuser Johanna Sjoberg recalled a comment made by Epstein in which he said Clinton “likes them young.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, I think it was a coded phrase to her.

To do what? You do know that you sound paranoid.

It doesn’t sound particularly paranoid. Donald Trump is a thug; sending coded phrases is exactly the kind of crap he’d do. And probably has done.

I'm the one who said it was a coded phrase to her. Ok, if you disagree, do you think it was a strange thing to say to a woman who has been convicted and raping minors and trafficking them?
"I wish her well." What do YOU think of that statement.

Well, I think Ghislaine is a victim of Epstein as well. What should Trump say about her?

She was a victim? Explain your perspective, because I certainly don’t see victimhood.

Stockholm syndrome. Victims become victimizers to please their abusers.

She still sought out, victimized and raped girls. She’s a criminal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, I think it was a coded phrase to her.

To do what? You do know that you sound paranoid.

It doesn’t sound particularly paranoid. Donald Trump is a thug; sending coded phrases is exactly the kind of crap he’d do. And probably has done.

I'm the one who said it was a coded phrase to her. Ok, if you disagree, do you think it was a strange thing to say to a woman who has been convicted and raping minors and trafficking them?
"I wish her well." What do YOU think of that statement.

Well, I think Ghislaine is a victim of Epstein as well. What should Trump say about her?

Did she testify to that under oath during the trial at which she was convicted?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, I think it was a coded phrase to her.

To do what? You do know that you sound paranoid.

It doesn’t sound particularly paranoid. Donald Trump is a thug; sending coded phrases is exactly the kind of crap he’d do. And probably has done.

I'm the one who said it was a coded phrase to her. Ok, if you disagree, do you think it was a strange thing to say to a woman who has been convicted and raping minors and trafficking them?
"I wish her well." What do YOU think of that statement.

Well, I think Ghislaine is a victim of Epstein as well. What should Trump say about her?

She was a victim? Explain your perspective, because I certainly don’t see victimhood.

Stockholm syndrome. Victims become victimizers to please their abusers.

She is as depraved as Epstein was. Trump will eventually be exposed as an Epstein insider. He hosted Epstein at his NYC hotel. He lusts for his own daughter! The underground network will never stop digging for evidence of the yet unnamed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, I think it was a coded phrase to her.

To do what? You do know that you sound paranoid.

It doesn’t sound particularly paranoid. Donald Trump is a thug; sending coded phrases is exactly the kind of crap he’d do. And probably has done.

I'm the one who said it was a coded phrase to her. Ok, if you disagree, do you think it was a strange thing to say to a woman who has been convicted and raping minors and trafficking them?
"I wish her well." What do YOU think of that statement.

Well, I think Ghislaine is a victim of Epstein as well. What should Trump say about her?

She was a victim? Explain your perspective, because I certainly don’t see victimhood.

Stockholm syndrome. Victims become victimizers to please their abusers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, I think it was a coded phrase to her.

To do what? You do know that you sound paranoid.

It doesn’t sound particularly paranoid. Donald Trump is a thug; sending coded phrases is exactly the kind of crap he’d do. And probably has done.

I'm the one who said it was a coded phrase to her. Ok, if you disagree, do you think it was a strange thing to say to a woman who has been convicted and raping minors and trafficking them?
"I wish her well." What do YOU think of that statement.

Well, I think Ghislaine is a victim of Epstein as well. What should Trump say about her?

She was a victim? Explain your perspective, because I certainly don’t see victimhood.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No, I think it was a coded phrase to her.

To do what? You do know that you sound paranoid.

It doesn’t sound particularly paranoid. Donald Trump is a thug; sending coded phrases is exactly the kind of crap he’d do. And probably has done.

I'm the one who said it was a coded phrase to her. Ok, if you disagree, do you think it was a strange thing to say to a woman who has been convicted and raping minors and trafficking them?
"I wish her well." What do YOU think of that statement.

Well, I think Ghislaine is a victim of Epstein as well. What should Trump say about her?

Anonymous wrote:Lots of elites in Washington were on the list. It was memory holed on purpose.

My guess is a lot of Democrats since they were friends with the guy

CIA is not our friend.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Recent events make clear there’s deep bipartisan protection of Israeli interests. That’s why you hear less about Epstein than you should!

This is the correct answer. It's difficult to tell whether he worked for Israel, though. My best guess is that Ghislane was associated with Israeli intelligence and she recruited Epstein. But my only reason for thinking this is that her dad was an Israeli spy. She would have been ripe for recruitment by any foreign intelligence service given her precipitous loss of wealth and status directly prior to immigrating to the US, and her access to powerful people would make her a great asset to any foreign intelligence service. That's why I don't rule out that she was working for Russia. They could easily run her and most people would conclude Israel, which makes her all the more valuable.

Classic Mossad diversion technique. Focus the conspiracy theories on another group.

Truth.