Anonymous wrote:It’s sad he is so clueless, he didn’t even realize that having the nanny there was bad PR. He actually thought this was going to make him look good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s sad he is so clueless, he didn’t even realize that having the nanny there was bad PR. He actually thought this was going to make him look good.
I don't a single Jonas Brothers song, I've never seen GoT -- I have no celebrity loyalty at all.
But I love it when performative nonsense blows up.
Anonymous wrote:It’s sad he is so clueless, he didn’t even realize that having the nanny there was bad PR. He actually thought this was going to make him look good.
Anonymous wrote:It’s sad he is so clueless, he didn’t even realize that having the nanny there was bad PR. He actually thought this was going to make him look good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh and Joe making “pancake faces” to his 3 year old? Barf. Such a show.
My husband did the same with our dc at that age. It’s cute. You just want to man hate on him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, the Christian mommies are out in full force tonight defending their precious Jonas brother.
But but but he brought his children to BREAKFAST!* While his harlot wife is at WORK! Burn the witch.
Anonymous wrote:Oh, the Christian mommies are out in full force tonight defending their precious Jonas brother.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe the outing was staged, I’ve never followed him or his wife to see what they , but people go out with their 14 months toddlers all the time.
Joe and Sophie have been pictured with their kids out at brunch, so it's a regular thing for them, but they've never been pictured out to brunch their family of four PLUS a nanny whereas Joe was pictured with his two kids and nanny. Like he needs a woman to take care of the kids.
Oh ffs, you women whine at the drop of the hat if you’re solely responsible for the children. He’s a working father with a staff because their mother is working in Europe! As for Sophie, the partying is not the right logic right now and none of us would do that while we were working g out divorce and custody issues and you all know that, unless of course she could care less and the stories are true. Either way he is taking care of this kids and I give him props for that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe the outing was staged, I’ve never followed him or his wife to see what they , but people go out with their 14 months toddlers all the time.
Joe and Sophie have been pictured with their kids out at brunch, so it's a regular thing for them, but they've never been pictured out to brunch their family of four PLUS a nanny whereas Joe was pictured with his two kids and nanny. Like he needs a woman to take care of the kids.
I know!
Maybe there’s an argument to be made that he just wanted to get out with his kids. (And I’m side eyeing that A LOT.) But it’s downright hilarious that he couldn’t even handle getting pancakes with his kids without help. It was a staged paparazzi shot and he brought the nanny??? I’m laughing so much at his “involved dad” cosplay.
That picture made me wonder if he’s ever spent an hour alone with his children. What a deadbeat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe the outing was staged, I’ve never followed him or his wife to see what they , but people go out with their 14 months toddlers all the time.
Joe and Sophie have been pictured with their kids out at brunch, so it's a regular thing for them, but they've never been pictured out to brunch their family of four PLUS a nanny whereas Joe was pictured with his two kids and nanny. Like he needs a woman to take care of the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Oh and Joe making “pancake faces” to his 3 year old? Barf. Such a show.