Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Biden admin just keeps pissing the wrong people off and it's going to back fire royally. They keep pushing they will see what's going to happen next election.
+100 THIS!
This idiocy was floated in another thread on this topic. It's as silly now as it was then.
I’m not sure I’d want to f-around with the Virginia vote.
Precisely which Republican candidate will be better for federal workers (i) on WFH issues, and (ii) generally speaking than Biden?
For this 52-year period, the federal workforce has had higher pay raises during a Republican administration. Here is how it breaks out.
The average pay raise per year: 3.71%
Under Republicans: 4.05%
Under Democrats: 3.65%
https://www.fedsmith.com/2021/01/10/50-years-federal-pay-democrats-v-republicans/
Yeah, because Rs screw up the economy so that Ds have to clean up a recession. That always comes with lower inflation.
I agree with you that Rs are awful, but no one has pointed to anything where the R presidential candidates said they would force federal employees back to the office. If Biden makes me spend 15 hours per week commuting just to please his rich donors, he is not getting my vote. I have no clue why anyone would support a candidate who gives such a strong middle finger to you. We don't know if a R would be better, but based on what Biden is advocating, it won't be any worse. So I'll take my chances.
I agree. The heck with all those women who may lose the right to choose. And I don't really care if corporate taxers are lowered to nothing. If I have ot do the commute I signed on for pre-pandemic, it'll turn me into a Trump voter. MAGA!!
So you can be mostly a one issue voter, butt someone who disagrees with you can't? Yeah, ok.
First,if you need a laundry list of other ways a Republican President would be terrible, there's really no hope for you. Second, I identified two major issues. Third, being a one issue voter is pretty silly in any circumstance, but it's just absurd when the issue is, "I am being required to do something, once again, hat I did for years before the pandemic."
NP. Oh, stop gaslighting. It is perfectly reasonable to vote against the president who causes a sharp decrease in your standard of living and personal happiness. Your entitlement is off the charts. Democrats aren’t owed the votes of fed workers.
I’m private sector with a competitive skill set (constantly recruited) and work hybrid. I like hybrid. But if I was made to go in every day, my resignation would happen the next day, as I am not worried about my ability to get a job. I don’t see why feds should not be expected to have the same freedom of choice, perhaps more because they make so much less for a similar skill set.
Of course the PP is going to vote against the president who makes her life much worse. Who wouldn’t?
A lot of people. By that logic, I'd never vote for democrats, who want to increase the minimum wage, raise taxes on the wealthy, support labor unions, and (ironically) keep the federal government fully staffed and functioning. But I vote for them anyway, because it's the right thing to do, and I don't put my petty desires above everything else. And make no mistake about it, "I need to spend more time in the office than I do now" is really petty, comparatively speaking.
Also, that's not what gaslighting is. You sound like my teenager, who thinks anytime she hears something she doesn't like it's gaslighting, It makes you sound silly.
You are just lying to yourself to prop up your ego. You are absolutely a beautiful example of the progressive who likes to tell other people what to do but would never actually do whatever they are ordering yourself.
I’m genuinely laughing at the idea that you believe you are a good person for voting for Democrats. What a egotistical nutcase you are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Biden admin just keeps pissing the wrong people off and it's going to back fire royally. They keep pushing they will see what's going to happen next election.
+100 THIS!
This idiocy was floated in another thread on this topic. It's as silly now as it was then.
I’m not sure I’d want to f-around with the Virginia vote.
Precisely which Republican candidate will be better for federal workers (i) on WFH issues, and (ii) generally speaking than Biden?
For this 52-year period, the federal workforce has had higher pay raises during a Republican administration. Here is how it breaks out.
The average pay raise per year: 3.71%
Under Republicans: 4.05%
Under Democrats: 3.65%
https://www.fedsmith.com/2021/01/10/50-years-federal-pay-democrats-v-republicans/
Yeah, because Rs screw up the economy so that Ds have to clean up a recession. That always comes with lower inflation.
I agree with you that Rs are awful, but no one has pointed to anything where the R presidential candidates said they would force federal employees back to the office. If Biden makes me spend 15 hours per week commuting just to please his rich donors, he is not getting my vote. I have no clue why anyone would support a candidate who gives such a strong middle finger to you. We don't know if a R would be better, but based on what Biden is advocating, it won't be any worse. So I'll take my chances.
I agree. The heck with all those women who may lose the right to choose. And I don't really care if corporate taxers are lowered to nothing. If I have ot do the commute I signed on for pre-pandemic, it'll turn me into a Trump voter. MAGA!!
The right to choose is already gone. Strange to hinge your vote on an issue that is no longer even up for debate at the national level. And what exactly has Biden done to raise corporate taxes?
Maybe the feckin’ useless Dems should have codified the right to choice and interstate reproductive services when they had the chance.
When exactly was that?
Oh I dunno, maybe during the multiple time periods when the controlled Congress and the Presidency.
Tell me you don't understand the filibuster without telling me you don't understand the filibuster.
Are all feds so ill-informed?
Anonymous wrote:I won’t vote for a Republican but I’m not donating money or energy to a Biden campaign because of this policy. I usually at least donate money to a presidential campaign.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Biden admin just keeps pissing the wrong people off and it's going to back fire royally. They keep pushing they will see what's going to happen next election.
+100 THIS!
This idiocy was floated in another thread on this topic. It's as silly now as it was then.
I’m not sure I’d want to f-around with the Virginia vote.
Precisely which Republican candidate will be better for federal workers (i) on WFH issues, and (ii) generally speaking than Biden?
For this 52-year period, the federal workforce has had higher pay raises during a Republican administration. Here is how it breaks out.
The average pay raise per year: 3.71%
Under Republicans: 4.05%
Under Democrats: 3.65%
https://www.fedsmith.com/2021/01/10/50-years-federal-pay-democrats-v-republicans/
Yeah, because Rs screw up the economy so that Ds have to clean up a recession. That always comes with lower inflation.
I agree with you that Rs are awful, but no one has pointed to anything where the R presidential candidates said they would force federal employees back to the office. If Biden makes me spend 15 hours per week commuting just to please his rich donors, he is not getting my vote. I have no clue why anyone would support a candidate who gives such a strong middle finger to you. We don't know if a R would be better, but based on what Biden is advocating, it won't be any worse. So I'll take my chances.
I agree. The heck with all those women who may lose the right to choose. And I don't really care if corporate taxers are lowered to nothing. If I have ot do the commute I signed on for pre-pandemic, it'll turn me into a Trump voter. MAGA!!
So you can be mostly a one issue voter, butt someone who disagrees with you can't? Yeah, ok.
First,if you need a laundry list of other ways a Republican President would be terrible, there's really no hope for you. Second, I identified two major issues. Third, being a one issue voter is pretty silly in any circumstance, but it's just absurd when the issue is, "I am being required to do something, once again, hat I did for years before the pandemic."
NP. Oh, stop gaslighting. It is perfectly reasonable to vote against the president who causes a sharp decrease in your standard of living and personal happiness. Your entitlement is off the charts. Democrats aren’t owed the votes of fed workers.
I’m private sector with a competitive skill set (constantly recruited) and work hybrid. I like hybrid. But if I was made to go in every day, my resignation would happen the next day, as I am not worried about my ability to get a job. I don’t see why feds should not be expected to have the same freedom of choice, perhaps more because they make so much less for a similar skill set.
Of course the PP is going to vote against the president who makes her life much worse. Who wouldn’t?
A lot of people. By that logic, I'd never vote for democrats, who want to increase the minimum wage, raise taxes on the wealthy, support labor unions, and (ironically) keep the federal government fully staffed and functioning. But I vote for them anyway, because it's the right thing to do, and I don't put my petty desires above everything else. And make no mistake about it, "I need to spend more time in the office than I do now" is really petty, comparatively speaking.
Also, that's not what gaslighting is. You sound like my teenager, who thinks anytime she hears something she doesn't like it's gaslighting, It makes you sound silly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Biden admin just keeps pissing the wrong people off and it's going to back fire royally. They keep pushing they will see what's going to happen next election.
+100 THIS!
This idiocy was floated in another thread on this topic. It's as silly now as it was then.
I’m not sure I’d want to f-around with the Virginia vote.
Precisely which Republican candidate will be better for federal workers (i) on WFH issues, and (ii) generally speaking than Biden?
For this 52-year period, the federal workforce has had higher pay raises during a Republican administration. Here is how it breaks out.
The average pay raise per year: 3.71%
Under Republicans: 4.05%
Under Democrats: 3.65%
https://www.fedsmith.com/2021/01/10/50-years-federal-pay-democrats-v-republicans/
Yeah, because Rs screw up the economy so that Ds have to clean up a recession. That always comes with lower inflation.
I agree with you that Rs are awful, but no one has pointed to anything where the R presidential candidates said they would force federal employees back to the office. If Biden makes me spend 15 hours per week commuting just to please his rich donors, he is not getting my vote. I have no clue why anyone would support a candidate who gives such a strong middle finger to you. We don't know if a R would be better, but based on what Biden is advocating, it won't be any worse. So I'll take my chances.
I agree. The heck with all those women who may lose the right to choose. And I don't really care if corporate taxers are lowered to nothing. If I have ot do the commute I signed on for pre-pandemic, it'll turn me into a Trump voter. MAGA!!
So you can be mostly a one issue voter, butt someone who disagrees with you can't? Yeah, ok.
First,if you need a laundry list of other ways a Republican President would be terrible, there's really no hope for you. Second, I identified two major issues. Third, being a one issue voter is pretty silly in any circumstance, but it's just absurd when the issue is, "I am being required to do something, once again, hat I did for years before the pandemic."
NP. Oh, stop gaslighting. It is perfectly reasonable to vote against the president who causes a sharp decrease in your standard of living and personal happiness. Your entitlement is off the charts. Democrats aren’t owed the votes of fed workers.
I’m private sector with a competitive skill set (constantly recruited) and work hybrid. I like hybrid. But if I was made to go in every day, my resignation would happen the next day, as I am not worried about my ability to get a job. I don’t see why feds should not be expected to have the same freedom of choice, perhaps more because they make so much less for a similar skill set.
Of course the PP is going to vote against the president who makes her life much worse. Who wouldn’t?
I’m really amused by the feds who think their life would be better under a republican president, or that a R president and congress would t call them back to the office. Guess the stereotype about feds being not so bright has more truth to it than I realized.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Biden admin just keeps pissing the wrong people off and it's going to back fire royally. They keep pushing they will see what's going to happen next election.
+100 THIS!
This idiocy was floated in another thread on this topic. It's as silly now as it was then.
I’m not sure I’d want to f-around with the Virginia vote.
Precisely which Republican candidate will be better for federal workers (i) on WFH issues, and (ii) generally speaking than Biden?
For this 52-year period, the federal workforce has had higher pay raises during a Republican administration. Here is how it breaks out.
The average pay raise per year: 3.71%
Under Republicans: 4.05%
Under Democrats: 3.65%
https://www.fedsmith.com/2021/01/10/50-years-federal-pay-democrats-v-republicans/
Yeah, because Rs screw up the economy so that Ds have to clean up a recession. That always comes with lower inflation.
I agree with you that Rs are awful, but no one has pointed to anything where the R presidential candidates said they would force federal employees back to the office. If Biden makes me spend 15 hours per week commuting just to please his rich donors, he is not getting my vote. I have no clue why anyone would support a candidate who gives such a strong middle finger to you. We don't know if a R would be better, but based on what Biden is advocating, it won't be any worse. So I'll take my chances.
I agree. The heck with all those women who may lose the right to choose. And I don't really care if corporate taxers are lowered to nothing. If I have ot do the commute I signed on for pre-pandemic, it'll turn me into a Trump voter. MAGA!!
So you can be mostly a one issue voter, butt someone who disagrees with you can't? Yeah, ok.
First,if you need a laundry list of other ways a Republican President would be terrible, there's really no hope for you. Second, I identified two major issues. Third, being a one issue voter is pretty silly in any circumstance, but it's just absurd when the issue is, "I am being required to do something, once again, hat I did for years before the pandemic."
I've seen what a complete dumpster fire the corrupt Biden administration has been.
And yes, there really is no hope for you.
I have yet to see any indictments in the Biden Administration or his campaign. At this time in the Trump Administration there were dozens. Maybe rely on facts rather than the right wing echo chamber that has proven time, and time again, to lie to people like you.
Examples: Hillary murdered Seth Rich and Vince Foster. The democrats run a pedo-ring out of the basement at Comet Pizza (there was no pedo ring and Comet doesn't have a basementthe 2020 election was stolen (Fox News paid how much to Dominion for their lies? Rudy just admitted he lied about GA poll workers etc) IOW, there is no proof to ANY corruption in the Biden Administration, and Hunter Biden has basically pled guilty to some stuff that has nothing to do with the White House, the Presidency, the Vice-Presidency, the Biden Campaign or anything else official.
Anonymous wrote:Can folks clarify whether the guidance is to RTO full time or just more?
I’m a State Department employee presently working in-person 16 hours per week. Will the likely expectation be for me to work in-person something more like 24 hours per week (I.e., 60 percent), or to return to in-person almost full time?
FYI that I’m on annual leave right now so not receiving any guidance from my management or agency.
Anonymous wrote:I love WFH more than anyone, but there’s no question that RTO is much better for the local economy. Lunches, metro rides, parking fees, dry cleaners, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Biden admin just keeps pissing the wrong people off and it's going to back fire royally. They keep pushing they will see what's going to happen next election.
+100 THIS!
This idiocy was floated in another thread on this topic. It's as silly now as it was then.
I’m not sure I’d want to f-around with the Virginia vote.
Precisely which Republican candidate will be better for federal workers (i) on WFH issues, and (ii) generally speaking than Biden?
For this 52-year period, the federal workforce has had higher pay raises during a Republican administration. Here is how it breaks out.
The average pay raise per year: 3.71%
Under Republicans: 4.05%
Under Democrats: 3.65%
https://www.fedsmith.com/2021/01/10/50-years-federal-pay-democrats-v-republicans/
Yeah, because Rs screw up the economy so that Ds have to clean up a recession. That always comes with lower inflation.
I agree with you that Rs are awful, but no one has pointed to anything where the R presidential candidates said they would force federal employees back to the office. If Biden makes me spend 15 hours per week commuting just to please his rich donors, he is not getting my vote. I have no clue why anyone would support a candidate who gives such a strong middle finger to you. We don't know if a R would be better, but based on what Biden is advocating, it won't be any worse. So I'll take my chances.
I agree. The heck with all those women who may lose the right to choose. And I don't really care if corporate taxers are lowered to nothing. If I have ot do the commute I signed on for pre-pandemic, it'll turn me into a Trump voter. MAGA!!
So you can be mostly a one issue voter, butt someone who disagrees with you can't? Yeah, ok.
First,if you need a laundry list of other ways a Republican President would be terrible, there's really no hope for you. Second, I identified two major issues. Third, being a one issue voter is pretty silly in any circumstance, but it's just absurd when the issue is, "I am being required to do something, once again, hat I did for years before the pandemic."
I've seen what a complete dumpster fire the corrupt Biden administration has been.
And yes, there really is no hope for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Biden admin just keeps pissing the wrong people off and it's going to back fire royally. They keep pushing they will see what's going to happen next election.
+100 THIS!
This idiocy was floated in another thread on this topic. It's as silly now as it was then.
I’m not sure I’d want to f-around with the Virginia vote.
Precisely which Republican candidate will be better for federal workers (i) on WFH issues, and (ii) generally speaking than Biden?
For this 52-year period, the federal workforce has had higher pay raises during a Republican administration. Here is how it breaks out.
The average pay raise per year: 3.71%
Under Republicans: 4.05%
Under Democrats: 3.65%
https://www.fedsmith.com/2021/01/10/50-years-federal-pay-democrats-v-republicans/
Yeah, because Rs screw up the economy so that Ds have to clean up a recession. That always comes with lower inflation.
I agree with you that Rs are awful, but no one has pointed to anything where the R presidential candidates said they would force federal employees back to the office. If Biden makes me spend 15 hours per week commuting just to please his rich donors, he is not getting my vote. I have no clue why anyone would support a candidate who gives such a strong middle finger to you. We don't know if a R would be better, but based on what Biden is advocating, it won't be any worse. So I'll take my chances.
I agree. The heck with all those women who may lose the right to choose. And I don't really care if corporate taxers are lowered to nothing. If I have ot do the commute I signed on for pre-pandemic, it'll turn me into a Trump voter. MAGA!!
The right to choose is already gone. Strange to hinge your vote on an issue that is no longer even up for debate at the national level. And what exactly has Biden done to raise corporate taxes?
Maybe the feckin’ useless Dems should have codified the right to choice and interstate reproductive services when they had the chance.
When exactly was that?
Oh I dunno, maybe during the multiple time periods when the controlled Congress and the Presidency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Biden admin just keeps pissing the wrong people off and it's going to back fire royally. They keep pushing they will see what's going to happen next election.
+100 THIS!
This idiocy was floated in another thread on this topic. It's as silly now as it was then.
I’m not sure I’d want to f-around with the Virginia vote.
Precisely which Republican candidate will be better for federal workers (i) on WFH issues, and (ii) generally speaking than Biden?
For this 52-year period, the federal workforce has had higher pay raises during a Republican administration. Here is how it breaks out.
The average pay raise per year: 3.71%
Under Republicans: 4.05%
Under Democrats: 3.65%
https://www.fedsmith.com/2021/01/10/50-years-federal-pay-democrats-v-republicans/
Yeah, because Rs screw up the economy so that Ds have to clean up a recession. That always comes with lower inflation.
I agree with you that Rs are awful, but no one has pointed to anything where the R presidential candidates said they would force federal employees back to the office. If Biden makes me spend 15 hours per week commuting just to please his rich donors, he is not getting my vote. I have no clue why anyone would support a candidate who gives such a strong middle finger to you. We don't know if a R would be better, but based on what Biden is advocating, it won't be any worse. So I'll take my chances.
I agree. The heck with all those women who may lose the right to choose. And I don't really care if corporate taxers are lowered to nothing. If I have ot do the commute I signed on for pre-pandemic, it'll turn me into a Trump voter. MAGA!!
So you can be mostly a one issue voter, butt someone who disagrees with you can't? Yeah, ok.
First,if you need a laundry list of other ways a Republican President would be terrible, there's really no hope for you. Second, I identified two major issues. Third, being a one issue voter is pretty silly in any circumstance, but it's just absurd when the issue is, "I am being required to do something, once again, hat I did for years before the pandemic."
I've seen what a complete dumpster fire the corrupt Biden administration has been.
And yes, there really is no hope for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Biden admin just keeps pissing the wrong people off and it's going to back fire royally. They keep pushing they will see what's going to happen next election.
+100 THIS!
This idiocy was floated in another thread on this topic. It's as silly now as it was then.
I’m not sure I’d want to f-around with the Virginia vote.
Precisely which Republican candidate will be better for federal workers (i) on WFH issues, and (ii) generally speaking than Biden?
For this 52-year period, the federal workforce has had higher pay raises during a Republican administration. Here is how it breaks out.
The average pay raise per year: 3.71%
Under Republicans: 4.05%
Under Democrats: 3.65%
https://www.fedsmith.com/2021/01/10/50-years-federal-pay-democrats-v-republicans/
Yeah, because Rs screw up the economy so that Ds have to clean up a recession. That always comes with lower inflation.
I agree with you that Rs are awful, but no one has pointed to anything where the R presidential candidates said they would force federal employees back to the office. If Biden makes me spend 15 hours per week commuting just to please his rich donors, he is not getting my vote. I have no clue why anyone would support a candidate who gives such a strong middle finger to you. We don't know if a R would be better, but based on what Biden is advocating, it won't be any worse. So I'll take my chances.
I agree. The heck with all those women who may lose the right to choose. And I don't really care if corporate taxers are lowered to nothing. If I have ot do the commute I signed on for pre-pandemic, it'll turn me into a Trump voter. MAGA!!
So you can be mostly a one issue voter, butt someone who disagrees with you can't? Yeah, ok.
First,if you need a laundry list of other ways a Republican President would be terrible, there's really no hope for you. Second, I identified two major issues. Third, being a one issue voter is pretty silly in any circumstance, but it's just absurd when the issue is, "I am being required to do something, once again, hat I did for years before the pandemic."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Biden admin just keeps pissing the wrong people off and it's going to back fire royally. They keep pushing they will see what's going to happen next election.
+100 THIS!
This idiocy was floated in another thread on this topic. It's as silly now as it was then.
I’m not sure I’d want to f-around with the Virginia vote.
Precisely which Republican candidate will be better for federal workers (i) on WFH issues, and (ii) generally speaking than Biden?
For this 52-year period, the federal workforce has had higher pay raises during a Republican administration. Here is how it breaks out.
The average pay raise per year: 3.71%
Under Republicans: 4.05%
Under Democrats: 3.65%
https://www.fedsmith.com/2021/01/10/50-years-federal-pay-democrats-v-republicans/
Yeah, because Rs screw up the economy so that Ds have to clean up a recession. That always comes with lower inflation.
I agree with you that Rs are awful, but no one has pointed to anything where the R presidential candidates said they would force federal employees back to the office. If Biden makes me spend 15 hours per week commuting just to please his rich donors, he is not getting my vote. I have no clue why anyone would support a candidate who gives such a strong middle finger to you. We don't know if a R would be better, but based on what Biden is advocating, it won't be any worse. So I'll take my chances.
I agree. The heck with all those women who may lose the right to choose. And I don't really care if corporate taxers are lowered to nothing. If I have ot do the commute I signed on for pre-pandemic, it'll turn me into a Trump voter. MAGA!!
Anonymous wrote:Can folks clarify whether the guidance is to RTO full time or just more?
I’m a State Department employee presently working in-person 16 hours per week. Will the likely expectation be for me to work in-person something more like 24 hours per week (I.e., 60 percent), or to return to in-person almost full time?
FYI that I’m on annual leave right now so not receiving any guidance from my management or agency.