Anonymous wrote:If you have three adult kids and they don’t want kids it might be that they had an unhappy childhood. Yes, the world is getting uglier and less attractive for raising children but most kids who grew up in a happy home want to have kids.
No one said that there's no point in existing, except the anti-kids people creating strawmen. OP said that she sacrificed her life having kids, and resents her kids for not doing the same. Lol, not much better, but let's be accurate.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This medieval thread is fascinating. I had no idea that people saw having kids as a quid pro quo, a means to a grandchild end? I’m a parent and I just can’t imagine thinking that way, haven’t we all learned at this point that forcing children/other people into lives they don’t want is just a recipe for misery? I want my kids to be happy in their lives and healthy and fulfilled. I know they may not take the routes I would prefer.
Without being glib, this is such a boomer mentality- all about them, all the time. (I am Gen X- whatever happens happens, and I’ll adjust!)
Same here! I honestly was quite surprised at this type of thinking - that there’s no point to existing (and/or no societal contribution) if an adult child doesn’t have children. I understand being disappointed if someone wanted grandchildren but this is way beyond that! I had no clue people felt that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This medieval thread is fascinating. I had no idea that people saw having kids as a quid pro quo, a means to a grandchild end? I’m a parent and I just can’t imagine thinking that way, haven’t we all learned at this point that forcing children/other people into lives they don’t want is just a recipe for misery? I want my kids to be happy in their lives and healthy and fulfilled. I know they may not take the routes I would prefer.
Without being glib, this is such a boomer mentality- all about them, all the time. (I am Gen X- whatever happens happens, and I’ll adjust!)
Same here! I honestly was quite surprised at this type of thinking - that there’s no point to existing (and/or no societal contribution) if an adult child doesn’t have children. I understand being disappointed if someone wanted grandchildren but this is way beyond that! I had no clue people felt that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bob Barker even though he lived till 99 will she on be forgotten as no kids.
His house, money, royalties will be divided up
Among strangers
And he doesn’t care. Because he is dead.
Anonymous wrote:This medieval thread is fascinating. I had no idea that people saw having kids as a quid pro quo, a means to a grandchild end? I’m a parent and I just can’t imagine thinking that way, haven’t we all learned at this point that forcing children/other people into lives they don’t want is just a recipe for misery? I want my kids to be happy in their lives and healthy and fulfilled. I know they may not take the routes I would prefer.
Without being glib, this is such a boomer mentality- all about them, all the time. (I am Gen X- whatever happens happens, and I’ll adjust!)
Anonymous wrote:This medieval thread is fascinating. I had no idea that people saw having kids as a quid pro quo, a means to a grandchild end? I’m a parent and I just can’t imagine thinking that way, haven’t we all learned at this point that forcing children/other people into lives they don’t want is just a recipe for misery? I want my kids to be happy in their lives and healthy and fulfilled. I know they may not take the routes I would prefer.
Without being glib, this is such a boomer mentality- all about them, all the time. (I am Gen X- whatever happens happens, and I’ll adjust!)
Anonymous wrote:Bob Barker even though he lived till 99 will she on be forgotten as no kids.
His house, money, royalties will be divided up
Among strangers
Anonymous wrote:The point is that they contribute to the betterment of society, knowledge and Earth. That is enough, imho.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who even mention the word legacy just crack me up. The absolute arrogance. I mean, why do people care about their legacies? Spoiler alert: you'll be dead, you won't know, or care. Live your life for now. Love people--or don't. Whatever. But please look closely at yourself and why not just care about how people think about you now, not once you dead. You know what: stop caring about your "legacy" and you'll probably find they enjoy you a lot more.
The vast majority of people don’t have a legacy and will be forgotten. Einstein, Paracelsus, Napoleon, and the likes have a legacy. Not Sally Smith from Bethesda, run of the mill big law partner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bob Barker even though he lived till 99 will she on be forgotten as no kids.
His house, money, royalties will be divided up
Among strangers
He'll be remembered long after anyone here will be.
Betty White didn't have kids either. Nor does Dolly Parton. Both will be remembered long after your grandchildren have died.
George Washington did not have his own kids. He will always be remembered.
Can add Oprah to the list.
Anonymous wrote:The more apt comparison to OP's complaint is that Oprah's mother won't be remembered.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bob Barker even though he lived till 99 will she on be forgotten as no kids.
His house, money, royalties will be divided up
Among strangers
He'll be remembered long after anyone here will be.
Betty White didn't have kids either. Nor does Dolly Parton. Both will be remembered long after your grandchildren have died.
George Washington did not have his own kids. He will always be remembered.
Can add Oprah to the list.
But not really, because OP isn't complaining about not having a legacy, she's complaining about not having grandkids. We should be allowed to bequeath more to our children who give us those over the others. It's not about love, it's about who needs it more.