Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guessing she was always mentally ill but family swept under the rug and got her no help, trying to maintain their “status” in Richmond society and her coveted place in St. Catherines. Keeping up appearances and all.

I think it is possible they did not know about the cp or her paraphilias.

Although the park incident that precipitated the divorce is pretty out there and everyone knew @ that.

Prob some other relatives who are bipolar or who otherwise avidly chase risks. But even then this is a huge taboo to cross and she seems to have been at it a while given her comfort and the detailed suggestions she shared. Her kids appear to be in the same age vicinity as the girl in the ruse, just beyond horrifying.

At that level of society, it is often about sweeping the family curses under the rug in order to keep up appearances.

However, the most striking difference is that female offenders are six times more likely than male offenders to have a co-offender. What is co-offending? When two or more people participate in the abuse of the same victim, they are co-offenders. Women may be involved by recruiting and coaxing the victims into dangerous situations and helping to provide a sense of safety for the victims. They may coerce or manipulate the victim, or perpetrate sexually abusive behaviors in front of, or at the same time as, the male abuser. Accusers in the Epstein cases allege that his female co-offenders engaged in all of these forms of abuse. Women co-offend for many reasons. Some may abuse victims for reasons similar to male offenders – for example, to gain power, to retaliate against someone, or due to sexual deviance. However, many are coerced or forced by the male co-offender. Many are threatened or physically abused to force participation. Others participate in exchange for money or drugs. Women who co-offend are different from those who offend alone in many ways. More have traumatic childhoods and strained relationships with parents due to parents being divorced, in prison or abusing drugs or alcohol. They are also more likely to be in a violent relationship with a husband or boyfriend, who is often the co-offender.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guessing she was always mentally ill but family swept under the rug and got her no help, trying to maintain their “status” in Richmond society and her coveted place in St. Catherines. Keeping up appearances and all.

I think it is possible they did not know about the cp or her paraphilias.

Although the park incident that precipitated the divorce is pretty out there and everyone knew @ that.

Prob some other relatives who are bipolar or who otherwise avidly chase risks. But even then this is a huge taboo to cross and she seems to have been at it a while given her comfort and the detailed suggestions she shared. Her kids appear to be in the same age vicinity as the girl in the ruse, just beyond horrifying.

Women are more likely than men to be the parent or guardian of the victim. The victims of female offenders are often younger than those of male offenders...

https://theconversation.com/what-the-jeffrey-epstein-case-reveals-about-female-sex-offenders-123423