Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have zero evidence that teacher pedophiles are in “every” school. That’s a blatant fallacy. Schools with ongoing histories of longtime employment of pedophiles are most concerning.

Gilman needs to allow victims, current and former students, to pick their own therapists that Gilman will pay for. Who wants to confide of their sex abuse to the school’s carefully selected counselors? That’s creepy as hell.

Gilman is doing this already as part of their plan moving forward. They have also brought in outside therapists not employed by the school
For the students and on the weekend has outside therapists for the parents.

Some people don’t want Gilman chosen therapists. There’s no guarantee of confidentiality. I know from the inside how othen the confidentiality requirement is completely ignored.

From the inside of what?

Therapists are bound to confidentiality - it doesn’t matter if Gilman pays their fees.

As I said, the confidentiality requirement is often ignored.

So you don’t like therapists period. Okay whatever.

Listen up. Therapists are critical to the care of Gilman rape victims and their families. Free choice of a therapist by your rape victims is equally critical. Why would Gilman oppose that?

This is such a bizarre thing for you to be fixating on.

Not a fixation, just a fact. Gilman should not be mandating which therapists they’ll pay. A grave injustice has been perpetrated on the victimized boys. They may require years and years of professional therapy. Child rape is the worst of all crimes. It may be impossible to ever have a healthy intimate relationship.

The actual victims will eventually get settlements and use the money for their chosen therapy among other things. As an initial matter, and for the rest of the school community, having a set of therapists on call or available is pretty much how every school in a similar situation handles this.

Therapists hired by Gilman are indeed an excellent option for anyone who trusts therapists hired by Gilman. It’s a sensitive relationship between the school and the therapists, especially as long as detectives are investigating how potential rumors of abuse were handled.

Gilman is not stopping you from getting your own therapist. Have at it. Please, seriously do.

You sound mighty irate that Gilman will be held accountable. Don’t you think rape victims deserve justice? And the perp should be severely punished for the 15 he got away with his crimes?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have zero evidence that teacher pedophiles are in “every” school. That’s a blatant fallacy. Schools with ongoing histories of longtime employment of pedophiles are most concerning.

Gilman needs to allow victims, current and former students, to pick their own therapists that Gilman will pay for. Who wants to confide of their sex abuse to the school’s carefully selected counselors? That’s creepy as hell.

Gilman is doing this already as part of their plan moving forward. They have also brought in outside therapists not employed by the school
For the students and on the weekend has outside therapists for the parents.

Some people don’t want Gilman chosen therapists. There’s no guarantee of confidentiality. I know from the inside how othen the confidentiality requirement is completely ignored.

From the inside of what?

Therapists are bound to confidentiality - it doesn’t matter if Gilman pays their fees.

As I said, the confidentiality requirement is often ignored.

So you don’t like therapists period. Okay whatever.

Listen up. Therapists are critical to the care of Gilman rape victims and their families. Free choice of a therapist by your rape victims is equally critical. Why would Gilman oppose that?

This is such a bizarre thing for you to be fixating on.

Not a fixation, just a fact. Gilman should not be mandating which therapists they’ll pay. A grave injustice has been perpetrated on the victimized boys. They may require years and years of professional therapy. Child rape is the worst of all crimes. It may be impossible to ever have a healthy intimate relationship.

The actual victims will eventually get settlements and use the money for their chosen therapy among other things. As an initial matter, and for the rest of the school community, having a set of therapists on call or available is pretty much how every school in a similar situation handles this.

Therapists hired by Gilman are indeed an excellent option for anyone who trusts therapists hired by Gilman. It’s a sensitive relationship between the school and the therapists, especially as long as detectives are investigating how potential rumors of abuse were handled.

Gilman is not stopping you from getting your own therapist. Have at it. Please, seriously do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have zero evidence that teacher pedophiles are in “every” school. That’s a blatant fallacy. Schools with ongoing histories of longtime employment of pedophiles are most concerning.

Gilman needs to allow victims, current and former students, to pick their own therapists that Gilman will pay for. Who wants to confide of their sex abuse to the school’s carefully selected counselors? That’s creepy as hell.

Gilman is doing this already as part of their plan moving forward. They have also brought in outside therapists not employed by the school
For the students and on the weekend has outside therapists for the parents.

Some people don’t want Gilman chosen therapists. There’s no guarantee of confidentiality. I know from the inside how othen the confidentiality requirement is completely ignored.

From the inside of what?

Therapists are bound to confidentiality - it doesn’t matter if Gilman pays their fees.

As I said, the confidentiality requirement is often ignored.

So you don’t like therapists period. Okay whatever.

Listen up. Therapists are critical to the care of Gilman rape victims and their families. Free choice of a therapist by your rape victims is equally critical. Why would Gilman oppose that?

This is such a bizarre thing for you to be fixating on.

Not a fixation, just a fact. Gilman should not be mandating which therapists they’ll pay. A grave injustice has been perpetrated on the victimized boys. They may require years and years of professional therapy. Child rape is the worst of all crimes. It may be impossible to ever have a healthy intimate relationship.

The actual victims will eventually get settlements and use the money for their chosen therapy among other things. As an initial matter, and for the rest of the school community, having a set of therapists on call or available is pretty much how every school in a similar situation handles this.

Therapists hired by Gilman are indeed an excellent option for anyone who trusts therapists hired by Gilman. It’s a sensitive relationship between the school and the therapists, especially as long as detectives are investigating how potential rumors of abuse were handled.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have zero evidence that teacher pedophiles are in “every” school. That’s a blatant fallacy. Schools with ongoing histories of longtime employment of pedophiles are most concerning.

Gilman needs to allow victims, current and former students, to pick their own therapists that Gilman will pay for. Who wants to confide of their sex abuse to the school’s carefully selected counselors? That’s creepy as hell.

Gilman is doing this already as part of their plan moving forward. They have also brought in outside therapists not employed by the school
For the students and on the weekend has outside therapists for the parents.

Some people don’t want Gilman chosen therapists. There’s no guarantee of confidentiality. I know from the inside how othen the confidentiality requirement is completely ignored.

From the inside of what?

Therapists are bound to confidentiality - it doesn’t matter if Gilman pays their fees.

As I said, the confidentiality requirement is often ignored.

So you don’t like therapists period. Okay whatever.

Listen up. Therapists are critical to the care of Gilman rape victims and their families. Free choice of a therapist by your rape victims is equally critical. Why would Gilman oppose that?

This is such a bizarre thing for you to be fixating on.

Not a fixation, just a fact. Gilman should not be mandating which therapists they’ll pay. A grave injustice has been perpetrated on the victimized boys. They may require years and years of professional therapy. Child rape is the worst of all crimes. It may be impossible to ever have a healthy intimate relationship.

The actual victims will eventually get settlements and use the money for their chosen therapy among other things. As an initial matter, and for the rest of the school community, having a set of therapists on call or available is pretty much how every school in a similar situation handles this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have zero evidence that teacher pedophiles are in “every” school. That’s a blatant fallacy. Schools with ongoing histories of longtime employment of pedophiles are most concerning.

Gilman needs to allow victims, current and former students, to pick their own therapists that Gilman will pay for. Who wants to confide of their sex abuse to the school’s carefully selected counselors? That’s creepy as hell.

Gilman is doing this already as part of their plan moving forward. They have also brought in outside therapists not employed by the school
For the students and on the weekend has outside therapists for the parents.

Some people don’t want Gilman chosen therapists. There’s no guarantee of confidentiality. I know from the inside how othen the confidentiality requirement is completely ignored.

From the inside of what?

Therapists are bound to confidentiality - it doesn’t matter if Gilman pays their fees.

As I said, the confidentiality requirement is often ignored.

So you don’t like therapists period. Okay whatever.

Listen up. Therapists are critical to the care of Gilman rape victims and their families. Free choice of a therapist by your rape victims is equally critical. Why would Gilman oppose that?

This is such a bizarre thing for you to be fixating on.

Not a fixation, just a fact. Gilman should not be mandating which therapists they’ll pay. A grave injustice has been perpetrated on the victimized boys. They may require years and years of professional therapy. Child rape is the worst of all crimes. It may be impossible to ever have a healthy intimate relationship.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have zero evidence that teacher pedophiles are in “every” school. That’s a blatant fallacy. Schools with ongoing histories of longtime employment of pedophiles are most concerning.

Gilman needs to allow victims, current and former students, to pick their own therapists that Gilman will pay for. Who wants to confide of their sex abuse to the school’s carefully selected counselors? That’s creepy as hell.

Gilman is doing this already as part of their plan moving forward. They have also brought in outside therapists not employed by the school
For the students and on the weekend has outside therapists for the parents.

Some people don’t want Gilman chosen therapists. There’s no guarantee of confidentiality. I know from the inside how othen the confidentiality requirement is completely ignored.

From the inside of what?

Therapists are bound to confidentiality - it doesn’t matter if Gilman pays their fees.

As I said, the confidentiality requirement is often ignored.

So you don’t like therapists period. Okay whatever.

Listen up. Therapists are critical to the care of Gilman rape victims and their families. Free choice of a therapist by your rape victims is equally critical. Why would Gilman oppose that?

This is such a bizarre thing for you to be fixating on.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have zero evidence that teacher pedophiles are in “every” school. That’s a blatant fallacy. Schools with ongoing histories of longtime employment of pedophiles are most concerning.

Gilman needs to allow victims, current and former students, to pick their own therapists that Gilman will pay for. Who wants to confide of their sex abuse to the school’s carefully selected counselors? That’s creepy as hell.

Gilman is doing this already as part of their plan moving forward. They have also brought in outside therapists not employed by the school
For the students and on the weekend has outside therapists for the parents.

Some people don’t want Gilman chosen therapists. There’s no guarantee of confidentiality. I know from the inside how othen the confidentiality requirement is completely ignored.

From the inside of what?

Therapists are bound to confidentiality - it doesn’t matter if Gilman pays their fees.

As I said, the confidentiality requirement is often ignored.

So you don’t like therapists period. Okay whatever.

Listen up. Therapists are critical to the care of Gilman rape victims and their families. Free choice of a therapist by your rape victims is equally critical. Why would Gilman oppose that?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have zero evidence that teacher pedophiles are in “every” school. That’s a blatant fallacy. Schools with ongoing histories of longtime employment of pedophiles are most concerning.

Gilman needs to allow victims, current and former students, to pick their own therapists that Gilman will pay for. Who wants to confide of their sex abuse to the school’s carefully selected counselors? That’s creepy as hell.

Gilman is doing this already as part of their plan moving forward. They have also brought in outside therapists not employed by the school
For the students and on the weekend has outside therapists for the parents.

Some people don’t want Gilman chosen therapists. There’s no guarantee of confidentiality. I know from the inside how othen the confidentiality requirement is completely ignored.

From the inside of what?

Therapists are bound to confidentiality - it doesn’t matter if Gilman pays their fees.

As I said, the confidentiality requirement is often ignored.

So you don’t like therapists period. Okay whatever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have zero evidence that teacher pedophiles are in “every” school. That’s a blatant fallacy. Schools with ongoing histories of longtime employment of pedophiles are most concerning.

Gilman needs to allow victims, current and former students, to pick their own therapists that Gilman will pay for. Who wants to confide of their sex abuse to the school’s carefully selected counselors? That’s creepy as hell.

Gilman is doing this already as part of their plan moving forward. They have also brought in outside therapists not employed by the school
For the students and on the weekend has outside therapists for the parents.

Some people don’t want Gilman chosen therapists. There’s no guarantee of confidentiality. I know from the inside how othen the confidentiality requirement is completely ignored.

From the inside of what?

Therapists are bound to confidentiality - it doesn’t matter if Gilman pays their fees.

As I said, the confidentiality requirement is often ignored.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have zero evidence that teacher pedophiles are in “every” school. That’s a blatant fallacy. Schools with ongoing histories of longtime employment of pedophiles are most concerning.

Gilman needs to allow victims, current and former students, to pick their own therapists that Gilman will pay for. Who wants to confide of their sex abuse to the school’s carefully selected counselors? That’s creepy as hell.

Gilman is doing this already as part of their plan moving forward. They have also brought in outside therapists not employed by the school
For the students and on the weekend has outside therapists for the parents.

Some people don’t want Gilman chosen therapists. There’s no guarantee of confidentiality. I know from the inside how othen the confidentiality requirement is completely ignored.

From the inside of what?

Therapists are bound to confidentiality - it doesn’t matter if Gilman pays their fees.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have zero evidence that teacher pedophiles are in “every” school. That’s a blatant fallacy. Schools with ongoing histories of longtime employment of pedophiles are most concerning.

Gilman needs to allow victims, current and former students, to pick their own therapists that Gilman will pay for. Who wants to confide of their sex abuse to the school’s carefully selected counselors? That’s creepy as hell.

Gilman is doing this already as part of their plan moving forward. They have also brought in outside therapists not employed by the school
For the students and on the weekend has outside therapists for the parents.

Some people don’t want Gilman chosen therapists. There’s no guarantee of confidentiality. I know from the inside how othen the confidentiality requirement is completely ignored.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We have zero evidence that teacher pedophiles are in “every” school. That’s a blatant fallacy. Schools with ongoing histories of longtime employment of pedophiles are most concerning.

Gilman needs to allow victims, current and former students, to pick their own therapists that Gilman will pay for. Who wants to confide of their sex abuse to the school’s carefully selected counselors? That’s creepy as hell.

Gilman is doing this already as part of their plan moving forward. They have also brought in outside therapists not employed by the school
For the students and on the weekend has outside therapists for the parents.

Anonymous wrote:We have zero evidence that teacher pedophiles are in “every” school. That’s a blatant fallacy. Schools with ongoing histories of longtime employment of pedophiles are most concerning.

Gilman needs to allow victims, current and former students, to pick their own therapists that Gilman will pay for. Who wants to confide of their sex abuse to the school’s carefully selected counselors? That’s creepy as hell.