Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the posts on these last few pages are from, at most, two people who are spewing junk about something they know little to nothing about. Perhaps they harbor a grudge against FCPS because their special little snowflakes were denied entry into AAP? Who knows...
There's only one way into AAP: the selection committee. The committee allows parents/guardians to appeal an initial rejection with additional work samples and evidence. Sometimes the committee grants an acceptance on appeal if the additional work samples and evidence give a fuller picture of the student's capabilities. This is especially true for students initially viewed to be on the fence between AAP and general education.
This process is not a secret. It also shouldn't be interpreted that kids who are accepted into AAP on appeal are somehow inferior to those kids who were granted an initial acceptance into the program. The selection committee doesn't lower its standards.
But they do accept WISC scores from private psychologists.
Shhh, we're supposed to keep this quiet!
It is on the County’s web page, it is public knowledge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the posts on these last few pages are from, at most, two people who are spewing junk about something they know little to nothing about. Perhaps they harbor a grudge against FCPS because their special little snowflakes were denied entry into AAP? Who knows...
There's only one way into AAP: the selection committee. The committee allows parents/guardians to appeal an initial rejection with additional work samples and evidence. Sometimes the committee grants an acceptance on appeal if the additional work samples and evidence give a fuller picture of the student's capabilities. This is especially true for students initially viewed to be on the fence between AAP and general education.
This process is not a secret. It also shouldn't be interpreted that kids who are accepted into AAP on appeal are somehow inferior to those kids who were granted an initial acceptance into the program. The selection committee doesn't lower its standards.
But they do accept WISC scores from private psychologists.
https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/BPLQKV69B096/$file/FCPS%20final%20report%2005.05.20.pdf The Aduit report from 2020 for people to look at.
The report calls out that a small number of appeals are lodged, page 43 says that 587 appeals came out of the 3,118 rejections for 2020, so 18% of the rejected kids had an appeal lodged, which makes it hard to believe that there are a large number of kids in any class that were accepted on appeal.
And we hear from folks with high WiSC scores that their kid was not accepted into AAP. We have an audit that says that the WiSC should be discontinued because there is a bias towards families who can afford the WiSC, so it is a known issue and one that it appears is being dealt with by the Committee ignoring the WiSC.
If you want to continue with the math, only around half of appeals are accepted. This means that fewer than 300 kids in the entire county get accepted on appeals in any given year. 3572 kids were found eligible that year in the regular screening cycle (page 32). This means only around 8% (300/3872) kids in AAP got there via appeals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the posts on these last few pages are from, at most, two people who are spewing junk about something they know little to nothing about. Perhaps they harbor a grudge against FCPS because their special little snowflakes were denied entry into AAP? Who knows...
There's only one way into AAP: the selection committee. The committee allows parents/guardians to appeal an initial rejection with additional work samples and evidence. Sometimes the committee grants an acceptance on appeal if the additional work samples and evidence give a fuller picture of the student's capabilities. This is especially true for students initially viewed to be on the fence between AAP and general education.
This process is not a secret. It also shouldn't be interpreted that kids who are accepted into AAP on appeal are somehow inferior to those kids who were granted an initial acceptance into the program. The selection committee doesn't lower its standards.
But they do accept WISC scores from private psychologists.
https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/BPLQKV69B096/$file/FCPS%20final%20report%2005.05.20.pdf The Aduit report from 2020 for people to look at.
The report calls out that a small number of appeals are lodged, page 43 says that 587 appeals came out of the 3,118 rejections for 2020, so 18% of the rejected kids had an appeal lodged, which makes it hard to believe that there are a large number of kids in any class that were accepted on appeal.
And we hear from folks with high WiSC scores that their kid was not accepted into AAP. We have an audit that says that the WiSC should be discontinued because there is a bias towards families who can afford the WiSC, so it is a known issue and one that it appears is being dealt with by the Committee ignoring the WiSC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the posts on these last few pages are from, at most, two people who are spewing junk about something they know little to nothing about. Perhaps they harbor a grudge against FCPS because their special little snowflakes were denied entry into AAP? Who knows...
There's only one way into AAP: the selection committee. The committee allows parents/guardians to appeal an initial rejection with additional work samples and evidence. Sometimes the committee grants an acceptance on appeal if the additional work samples and evidence give a fuller picture of the student's capabilities. This is especially true for students initially viewed to be on the fence between AAP and general education.
This process is not a secret. It also shouldn't be interpreted that kids who are accepted into AAP on appeal are somehow inferior to those kids who were granted an initial acceptance into the program. The selection committee doesn't lower its standards.
But they do accept WISC scores from private psychologists.
Shhh, we're supposed to keep this quiet!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the posts on these last few pages are from, at most, two people who are spewing junk about something they know little to nothing about. Perhaps they harbor a grudge against FCPS because their special little snowflakes were denied entry into AAP? Who knows...
There's only one way into AAP: the selection committee. The committee allows parents/guardians to appeal an initial rejection with additional work samples and evidence. Sometimes the committee grants an acceptance on appeal if the additional work samples and evidence give a fuller picture of the student's capabilities. This is especially true for students initially viewed to be on the fence between AAP and general education.
This process is not a secret. It also shouldn't be interpreted that kids who are accepted into AAP on appeal are somehow inferior to those kids who were granted an initial acceptance into the program. The selection committee doesn't lower its standards.
But they do accept WISC scores from private psychologists.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has become unhinged with emotional people using a lot of words and not saying a thing.
No it says the AAP admissions process is a sham with a side door entrance for parents with money and resources.
hardly a newsflash everyone already knows this
Many posters on here are 'Side door Deniers'.
NP. I think you all are being obtuse. If the kids benefit from AAP, then why get rid of it? Maybe it should be expanded and we allow MORE students into AAP. Instead of getting rid of a wonderful resource because people with resources are interested in it. I have always thought that school should be very dynamic and allow kids to move up or down in classes based on their performance. If kids can do well in AAP, then they can stay.
I feel like this is the opposite of resource hoarding. You all seem to want schools to provide absolutely nothing. You're saying that if a few kids can never do calculus or statistics, it shouldn't be allowed for anyone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has become unhinged with emotional people using a lot of words and not saying a thing.
No it says the AAP admissions process is a sham with a side door entrance for parents with money and resources.
hardly a newsflash everyone already knows this
Many posters on here are 'Side door Deniers'.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the posts on these last few pages are from, at most, two people who are spewing junk about something they know little to nothing about. Perhaps they harbor a grudge against FCPS because their special little snowflakes were denied entry into AAP? Who knows...
There's only one way into AAP: the selection committee. The committee allows parents/guardians to appeal an initial rejection with additional work samples and evidence. Sometimes the committee grants an acceptance on appeal if the additional work samples and evidence give a fuller picture of the student's capabilities. This is especially true for students initially viewed to be on the fence between AAP and general education.
This process is not a secret. It also shouldn't be interpreted that kids who are accepted into AAP on appeal are somehow inferior to those kids who were granted an initial acceptance into the program. The selection committee doesn't lower its standards.
But they do accept WISC scores from private psychologists.
Anonymous wrote:I think the posts on these last few pages are from, at most, two people who are spewing junk about something they know little to nothing about. Perhaps they harbor a grudge against FCPS because their special little snowflakes were denied entry into AAP? Who knows...
There's only one way into AAP: the selection committee. The committee allows parents/guardians to appeal an initial rejection with additional work samples and evidence. Sometimes the committee grants an acceptance on appeal if the additional work samples and evidence give a fuller picture of the student's capabilities. This is especially true for students initially viewed to be on the fence between AAP and general education.
This process is not a secret. It also shouldn't be interpreted that kids who are accepted into AAP on appeal are somehow inferior to those kids who were granted an initial acceptance into the program. The selection committee doesn't lower its standards.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has become unhinged with emotional people using a lot of words and not saying a thing.
No it says the AAP admissions process is a sham with a side door entrance for parents with money and resources.
You say this and offer no evidence. Your credibility is nothing.
You sound bitter. Did you expect to keep a lid on the 'side entrance' indefinitely?
Maybe it's only known in some circles but at my kid's school, from what I gathered from their principal, over half the kids in their class got in this way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has become unhinged with emotional people using a lot of words and not saying a thing.
No it says the AAP admissions process is a sham with a side door entrance for parents with money and resources.
You say this and offer no evidence. Your credibility is nothing.
You sound bitter. Did you expect to keep a lid on the 'side entrance' indefinitely?
Maybe it's only known in some circles but at my kid's school, from what I gathered from their principal, over half the kids in their class got in this way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has become unhinged with emotional people using a lot of words and not saying a thing.
No it says the AAP admissions process is a sham with a side door entrance for parents with money and resources.
You say this and offer no evidence. Your credibility is nothing.
You sound bitter. Did you expect to keep a lid on the 'side entrance' indefinitely?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has become unhinged with emotional people using a lot of words and not saying a thing.
No it says the AAP admissions process is a sham with a side door entrance for parents with money and resources.
hardly a newsflash everyone already knows this
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread has become unhinged with emotional people using a lot of words and not saying a thing.
No it says the AAP admissions process is a sham with a side door entrance for parents with money and resources.