Anonymous wrote:The Harry Styles relationship seemed fake and manufactured to me. Harry seems gay and Olivia seems like a lesbian. And if the relationship was real, it was highly unprofessional and Olivia comes across as one of those gen X ‘cool mom’ ladies going through a mid-life crisis who can’t admit she’s not young anymore. You know the type - they try to dress hip, flirt with young men, use young lingo, attention seek on social media, and some even implode their family. Sweetie, you’re like 40, middle aged — a long ways past being a sorority girl.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody knows if Jason was crazy or violent. Nobody knows if she just fell for a younger guy and convinced herself she was a victim and felt compelled to paint Jason in a bad light so she wouldn’t feel like the bad guy. Both are plausible. They all suck.

And to the pp who feels sorry for Harry because he isn’t interested in drama or media attention: Lol. The guy craves attention. Nonetheless, he will pull an Ashton Kutcher pretty soon and move on to a fertile woman.

Olivia Wilde is 38. Contrary to what you may believe, women can still have babies well into their 40s.

When he's 40, does he want to be with a woman in menopause?

Does any man?!

Anonymous wrote:Why isn't OW getting the MeToo treatment?

She literally banged her subordinate at work.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the Daily Mail didn't pay the nanny as they claim, then why is the nanny doing this? A tell all book likely won't pay much and these actors have endless money to throw at good lawyers.

There have been past reports about this nanny harassing the family. It could be as simple as someone with a personality disorder who managed to keep it hidden for a while but now it’s coming out in petty, vindictive fashion. Without a reference she’s not going to get hired as a Hollywood nanny again, so she probably figures she has nothing to lose by getting some revenge.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This all has to be making Harry cringe. He is so private, and to have his girlfriend as tabloid fodder day in and day out has to be making him re-think this.

I'm not a big Harry Styles fan but this has been one of my thoughts too. Frankly I'm surprised him and OW are still toether. And, as a Ted Lasso fan, I wonder if this is partially why we have nothing re: season 3 yet beyond pics of filming.

I get why Harry went for her in the first place - she's older (he likes that), she's accomplished & intelligent, she has some British ancestry, she's a big girl and can handle the fandom hate. But this media circus is complete anathema to who he is. I do feel badly for him - anyone he dates has to deal with BS, but this is on another level.

Anonymous wrote:Jana Kramer has recently come out to say that when she found out her husband was cheating, she took a baseball bat and smashed quite a few things in the house. She also destroyed some of his clothes.

Jason finds out his long term partner is sleeping with HS - he gets mad. It doesn't sound like he did anything but anger can create a sense of fear on its own.

Harry has been saying he wants a family since he was in the band. He has always talked about wanting the wife and kids...not sure if he was wanting a ready made family like this or his own but he does usually like to fly under the radar for relationships so it will be interesting to see what happens next.

Anonymous wrote:If the Daily Mail didn't pay the nanny as they claim, then why is the nanny doing this? A tell all book likely won't pay much and these actors have endless money to throw at good lawyers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The biggest takeaway I got from all this (assuming these claims are true) is that Jason Sudeikis is......NOT Ted Lasso. He sounds borderline abusive, not just to Olivia but to the nanny as well. At times both of them are telling him they are scared of him and the nanny refuses to come down to see him. He gets angry with the nanny for daring to communicate with Olivia (who is the mother of the kids she is responsible for), he makes her go to sessions with his life therapist so the therapist can get dirt on Olivia from her, he fires her in a drunken rage for doing so and throws her out of the house where she lives. What is all this?

All the headlines are focusing on the "affair" (and salad dressing), but how are people ignoring all this problematic behavior?

I think he sounds panicky about his family and life falling apart after finding about about the deception and lies of a cheating partner. And someone who is coping by drinking too much. He has lost all control over his life and is trying to find a way to get a little back. His behaviour is problematic but it could be very context specific. He is at home with the kids while his wife is out sleeping with someone else and living away for 'work'. That has made a lot of men and women very angry and hurt.

Interesting the nanny clearly doesn't like either of them! It isn't very often you see a celebrity nanny prepared to spill on their bosses as it means no more Hollywood work for them. She was obviously fed up enough she decided to take the Daily Mail paycheck and blow it up!

There have been past reports of this nanny harassing Sudeikis and Wilde since she was fired. I suspect she went to DM to get paid because her reputation as a nanny was trash and she couldn’t get hired by anyone else. Would you trust this person to care for your child?

The nanny says she was mad how it ended and she left mistreated and didn't get severance pay due to the was she fired or did she resign debate during this mess. She also didn't get to say good bye to the two kids who she had been with for 3 years. Sounds like she decided to cut her losses and get the Daily Mail to pay her severance check. Likely the mess of the situation made her never want to nanny for celebs again! I wonder how much he daily mail would pay for a story like this.

Even worse, the nanny couldn't get unemployment because OW and JS maintained that she voluntarily resigned.

The nanny was absolutely in the clear to go to the Daily Mail and get paid for the interview. OW and JS basically abused their nanny, put her in the middle of their insane break-up, kicked her out of housing in a foreign country in the middle of the night, and then essentially forced her out without severance. And then.....wouldn't let her apply for unemployment because she technically "resigned."

Such ungrateful, ungracious, rich narcissists. They deserve to have their tea spilled in the tabloids.

Moral of the story: if you're famous and going through horrible life events, treat your staff well and pay for their discretion. OW and JS were stupid to not offer this nanny a five-figure severance given everything they put her through.

DailyMail,says the nanny was NOT paid for the interview.

So sad. I’d want the nanny to make $$$$. They clearly treated her like garbage. The least she can do is sell
Her story and texts. He’ll, the Enquirer could have paid her for the story. Is the Enquirer still around?! I want the nanny to be okay and paid. She’s the real victim here. Not OW or JS - they are garbage people to treat the nanny poorly. I am team Nanny - 100%

I don’t see her as the victim. She was utterly unprofessional to get involved with their personal lives and seemed to enjoy stirring the pot. She quickly learned she was mere hired help not a member of the family. #teamtheyallsuck

Its not on the employee to set the boundaries, it is on the employer and it appears there were none.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s trash. A spiked privileged child of the elites who hasn’t actually had to work for anything and when she found herself having to work on her relationship- YUP because having two kids and juggling two careers is where the real work of marriage starts!!!! - she cut her losses and ran. She is attention seeking trash like another woman we aren’t allowed to mention on this page, she seeks attention, she plays the victim, she is of limited talent except her sex appeal and she will trash and ruin everyone she can to get her way. And those poor kids caught in the crosshairs.
Jason sudeikis doesn’t have to be a saint to be the wronged party in his divorce from this viper!!! She’s awful!

They never married so little incentive to work at it from either side.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody knows if Jason was crazy or violent. Nobody knows if she just fell for a younger guy and convinced herself she was a victim and felt compelled to paint Jason in a bad light so she wouldn’t feel like the bad guy. Both are plausible. They all suck.

And to the pp who feels sorry for Harry because he isn’t interested in drama or media attention: Lol. The guy craves attention. Nonetheless, he will pull an Ashton Kutcher pretty soon and move on to a fertile woman.

Olivia Wilde is 38. Contrary to what you may believe, women can still have babies well into their 40s.

When he's 40, does he want to be with a woman in menopause?