Anonymous wrote:Sometimes “sympathetic” articles like this are low-key vehicles to shade the people naive enough to consent to them. I find it hard to believe that no one at the WSJ involved with this article didn’t realize that she was making fool of herelf. They know stories like this are irresistible catnip for upper-middle-class “Karens,” and the WSJ has bills to pay.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not the whole article, but here is the lede:
“ Kaitlyn Younger has been an academic standout since she started studying algebra in third grade.
She took her first advanced-placement course as a freshman, scored 1550 on her SATs as a junior at McKinney High School near Dallas and will graduate this spring with an unweighted 3.95 grade-point average and as the founder of the school’s accounting club. Along the way she performed in and directed about 30 plays, sang in the school choir, scored top marks on the tests she has so far taken for 11 advanced-placement classes, helped run a summer camp and held down a part-time job.
“She is extraordinary,” said Jeff Cranmore, her guidance counselor at McKinney High School.
Ms. Younger, 18 years old, was cautiously optimistic when she applied to top U.S. colleges last fall. Responses came this month: Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Brown, Cornell, University of Pennsylvania, University of Southern California, University of California, Berkeley, and Northwestern all rejected her.
“I expected a bunch wouldn’t accept me,” she said. “I didn’t expect it to be this bad.””
It says she’s going to Arizona State.
And here is where I stop reading. These schools are all so different. It's the shotgun approach. Glad she found a nice place to land.
The average 12th grader in Texas doesn’t know that these schools are all “different.”
And that's the point. The applicant is average and someone should have set her straight before she consented to this story.
Very strange story. Why did the WSJ choose to profile this student who sounds great but hardly a shoe in for any of the schools she desired? I don't get why they used her as an example of what they are claiming.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not the whole article, but here is the lede:
“ Kaitlyn Younger has been an academic standout since she started studying algebra in third grade.
She took her first advanced-placement course as a freshman, scored 1550 on her SATs as a junior at McKinney High School near Dallas and will graduate this spring with an unweighted 3.95 grade-point average and as the founder of the school’s accounting club. Along the way she performed in and directed about 30 plays, sang in the school choir, scored top marks on the tests she has so far taken for 11 advanced-placement classes, helped run a summer camp and held down a part-time job.
“She is extraordinary,” said Jeff Cranmore, her guidance counselor at McKinney High School.
Ms. Younger, 18 years old, was cautiously optimistic when she applied to top U.S. colleges last fall. Responses came this month: Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Brown, Cornell, University of Pennsylvania, University of Southern California, University of California, Berkeley, and Northwestern all rejected her.
“I expected a bunch wouldn’t accept me,” she said. “I didn’t expect it to be this bad.””
It says she’s going to Arizona State.
And here is where I stop reading. These schools are all so different. It's the shotgun approach. Glad she found a nice place to land.
The average 12th grader in Texas doesn’t know that these schools are all “different.”
And that's the point. The applicant is average and someone should have set her straight before she consented to this story.
Very strange story. Why did the WSJ choose to profile this student who sounds great but hardly a shoe in for any of the schools she desired? I don't get why they used her as an example of what they are claiming.
Duh, she’s white and most readers won’t question the implication a victim
This.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not the whole article, but here is the lede:
“ Kaitlyn Younger has been an academic standout since she started studying algebra in third grade.
She took her first advanced-placement course as a freshman, scored 1550 on her SATs as a junior at McKinney High School near Dallas and will graduate this spring with an unweighted 3.95 grade-point average and as the founder of the school’s accounting club. Along the way she performed in and directed about 30 plays, sang in the school choir, scored top marks on the tests she has so far taken for 11 advanced-placement classes, helped run a summer camp and held down a part-time job.
“She is extraordinary,” said Jeff Cranmore, her guidance counselor at McKinney High School.
Ms. Younger, 18 years old, was cautiously optimistic when she applied to top U.S. colleges last fall. Responses came this month: Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Brown, Cornell, University of Pennsylvania, University of Southern California, University of California, Berkeley, and Northwestern all rejected her.
“I expected a bunch wouldn’t accept me,” she said. “I didn’t expect it to be this bad.””
It says she’s going to Arizona State.
And here is where I stop reading. These schools are all so different. It's the shotgun approach. Glad she found a nice place to land.
The average 12th grader in Texas doesn’t know that these schools are all “different.”
And that's the point. The applicant is average and someone should have set her straight before she consented to this story.
Very strange story. Why did the WSJ choose to profile this student who sounds great but hardly a shoe in for any of the schools she desired? I don't get why they used her as an example of what they are claiming.
Duh, she’s white and most readers won’t question the implication a victim
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not the whole article, but here is the lede:
“ Kaitlyn Younger has been an academic standout since she started studying algebra in third grade.
She took her first advanced-placement course as a freshman, scored 1550 on her SATs as a junior at McKinney High School near Dallas and will graduate this spring with an unweighted 3.95 grade-point average and as the founder of the school’s accounting club. Along the way she performed in and directed about 30 plays, sang in the school choir, scored top marks on the tests she has so far taken for 11 advanced-placement classes, helped run a summer camp and held down a part-time job.
“She is extraordinary,” said Jeff Cranmore, her guidance counselor at McKinney High School.
Ms. Younger, 18 years old, was cautiously optimistic when she applied to top U.S. colleges last fall. Responses came this month: Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Brown, Cornell, University of Pennsylvania, University of Southern California, University of California, Berkeley, and Northwestern all rejected her.
“I expected a bunch wouldn’t accept me,” she said. “I didn’t expect it to be this bad.””
It says she’s going to Arizona State.
And here is where I stop reading. These schools are all so different. It's the shotgun approach. Glad she found a nice place to land.
The average 12th grader in Texas doesn’t know that these schools are all “different.”
And that's the point. The applicant is average and someone should have set her straight before she consented to this story.
Very strange story. Why did the WSJ choose to profile this student who sounds great but hardly a shoe in for any of the schools she desired? I don't get why they used her as an example of what they are claiming.
Duh, she’s white and most readers won’t question the implication a victim
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not the whole article, but here is the lede:
“ Kaitlyn Younger has been an academic standout since she started studying algebra in third grade.
She took her first advanced-placement course as a freshman, scored 1550 on her SATs as a junior at McKinney High School near Dallas and will graduate this spring with an unweighted 3.95 grade-point average and as the founder of the school’s accounting club. Along the way she performed in and directed about 30 plays, sang in the school choir, scored top marks on the tests she has so far taken for 11 advanced-placement classes, helped run a summer camp and held down a part-time job.
“She is extraordinary,” said Jeff Cranmore, her guidance counselor at McKinney High School.
Ms. Younger, 18 years old, was cautiously optimistic when she applied to top U.S. colleges last fall. Responses came this month: Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Brown, Cornell, University of Pennsylvania, University of Southern California, University of California, Berkeley, and Northwestern all rejected her.
“I expected a bunch wouldn’t accept me,” she said. “I didn’t expect it to be this bad.””
It says she’s going to Arizona State.
And here is where I stop reading. These schools are all so different. It's the shotgun approach. Glad she found a nice place to land.
The average 12th grader in Texas doesn’t know that these schools are all “different.”
And that's the point. The applicant is average and someone should have set her straight before she consented to this story.
Very strange story. Why did the WSJ choose to profile this student who sounds great but hardly a shoe in for any of the schools she desired? I don't get why they used her as an example of what they are claiming.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not the whole article, but here is the lede:
“ Kaitlyn Younger has been an academic standout since she started studying algebra in third grade.
She took her first advanced-placement course as a freshman, scored 1550 on her SATs as a junior at McKinney High School near Dallas and will graduate this spring with an unweighted 3.95 grade-point average and as the founder of the school’s accounting club. Along the way she performed in and directed about 30 plays, sang in the school choir, scored top marks on the tests she has so far taken for 11 advanced-placement classes, helped run a summer camp and held down a part-time job.
“She is extraordinary,” said Jeff Cranmore, her guidance counselor at McKinney High School.
Ms. Younger, 18 years old, was cautiously optimistic when she applied to top U.S. colleges last fall. Responses came this month: Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Brown, Cornell, University of Pennsylvania, University of Southern California, University of California, Berkeley, and Northwestern all rejected her.
“I expected a bunch wouldn’t accept me,” she said. “I didn’t expect it to be this bad.””
It says she’s going to Arizona State.
And here is where I stop reading. These schools are all so different. It's the shotgun approach. Glad she found a nice place to land.
The average 12th grader in Texas doesn’t know that these schools are all “different.”
And that's the point. The applicant is average and someone should have set her straight before she consented to this story.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not the whole article, but here is the lede:
“ Kaitlyn Younger has been an academic standout since she started studying algebra in third grade.
She took her first advanced-placement course as a freshman, scored 1550 on her SATs as a junior at McKinney High School near Dallas and will graduate this spring with an unweighted 3.95 grade-point average and as the founder of the school’s accounting club. Along the way she performed in and directed about 30 plays, sang in the school choir, scored top marks on the tests she has so far taken for 11 advanced-placement classes, helped run a summer camp and held down a part-time job.
“She is extraordinary,” said Jeff Cranmore, her guidance counselor at McKinney High School.
Ms. Younger, 18 years old, was cautiously optimistic when she applied to top U.S. colleges last fall. Responses came this month: Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Brown, Cornell, University of Pennsylvania, University of Southern California, University of California, Berkeley, and Northwestern all rejected her.
“I expected a bunch wouldn’t accept me,” she said. “I didn’t expect it to be this bad.””
It says she’s going to Arizona State.
And here is where I stop reading. These schools are all so different. It's the shotgun approach. Glad she found a nice place to land.
The average 12th grader in Texas doesn’t know that these schools are all “different.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not the whole article, but here is the lede:
“ Kaitlyn Younger has been an academic standout since she started studying algebra in third grade.
She took her first advanced-placement course as a freshman, scored 1550 on her SATs as a junior at McKinney High School near Dallas and will graduate this spring with an unweighted 3.95 grade-point average and as the founder of the school’s accounting club. Along the way she performed in and directed about 30 plays, sang in the school choir, scored top marks on the tests she has so far taken for 11 advanced-placement classes, helped run a summer camp and held down a part-time job.
“She is extraordinary,” said Jeff Cranmore, her guidance counselor at McKinney High School.
Ms. Younger, 18 years old, was cautiously optimistic when she applied to top U.S. colleges last fall. Responses came this month: Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Brown, Cornell, University of Pennsylvania, University of Southern California, University of California, Berkeley, and Northwestern all rejected her.
“I expected a bunch wouldn’t accept me,” she said. “I didn’t expect it to be this bad.””
It says she’s going to Arizona State.
And here is where I stop reading. These schools are all so different. It's the shotgun approach. Glad she found a nice place to land.
The average 12th grader in Texas doesn’t know that these schools are all “different.”
Anonymous wrote:Not the whole article, but here is the lede:
“ Kaitlyn Younger has been an academic standout since she started studying algebra in third grade.
She took her first advanced-placement course as a freshman, scored 1550 on her SATs as a junior at McKinney High School near Dallas and will graduate this spring with an unweighted 3.95 grade-point average and as the founder of the school’s accounting club. Along the way she performed in and directed about 30 plays, sang in the school choir, scored top marks on the tests she has so far taken for 11 advanced-placement classes, helped run a summer camp and held down a part-time job.
“She is extraordinary,” said Jeff Cranmore, her guidance counselor at McKinney High School.
Ms. Younger, 18 years old, was cautiously optimistic when she applied to top U.S. colleges last fall. Responses came this month: Stanford, Harvard, Yale, Brown, Cornell, University of Pennsylvania, University of Southern California, University of California, Berkeley, and Northwestern all rejected her.
“I expected a bunch wouldn’t accept me,” she said. “I didn’t expect it to be this bad.””
It says she’s going to Arizona State.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I thought smart kids went to IVY. Now I know it has nothing to do with how smart they are.
It absolutely does, and also how hard they had to work to overcome really hard circumstances. As it should be.
Speaking of fantasies. Overcoming hard circumstances? For maybe 2% of them. The rest are privileged beyond comprehension for most Americans.
I hate to break it to you, but being first gen and/or a URM IS a hard circumstance.
I hate to break it to you, but my 1/4 black kids who look 100% white and have been raised in an upper middle class home are considered URMs for the purpose of college admissions. They definitely have not had unduly “hard circumstances” and yet it is kids like them who benefit most from affirmative action. I’m certainly not going to force them to not claim 1/4th of their ancestry and hence lower their admissions potential but objectively it is blatantly unfair that they are getting this huge advantage.
Troll.
I am 100% not a troll. What is it about my statement that you find hard to believe?
Most 1/4 black kids don’t look 100% white.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I thought smart kids went to IVY. Now I know it has nothing to do with how smart they are.
It absolutely does, and also how hard they had to work to overcome really hard circumstances. As it should be.
Speaking of fantasies. Overcoming hard circumstances? For maybe 2% of them. The rest are privileged beyond comprehension for most Americans.
I hate to break it to you, but being first gen and/or a URM IS a hard circumstance.
I hate to break it to you, but my 1/4 black kids who look 100% white and have been raised in an upper middle class home are considered URMs for the purpose of college admissions. They definitely have not had unduly “hard circumstances” and yet it is kids like them who benefit most from affirmative action. I’m certainly not going to force them to not claim 1/4th of their ancestry and hence lower their admissions potential but objectively it is blatantly unfair that they are getting this huge advantage.
Troll.
I am 100% not a troll. What is it about my statement that you find hard to believe?