Anonymous wrote:The standard in AAP isn't all that high. People need to get over it. Every kid in FCPS can and should be able to succeed in an AAP classroom. The notion that AAP is special is ridiculous. Let's stop watering down our school curriculums and push every kid towards excellence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Received word of a meeting coming up highlighting some proposed changes to "class placement" for next year. Some of the bulleted items include:
1. Additional classroom for student receiving Level IV services (i.e. a 2nd AAP classroom)
2. Teachers 3-6th provide Level IV curriculum to ALL (yes, it was capitalized)
3. Specific differentiation to groups
the Why? Access and Opportunity to ALL students (again, capitalized)
Our school is local level IV and our child is already in AAP, so it shouldn't affect us. Just wondering if there are other ES's going the same route. I have heard from some parents that there are a multitude of kids designated as "Level III" but the AAP can't accommodate them all (the AART teacher has taken on the load), so maybe that's what's driving it?
It would be really great if they piloted an AAP for all where all kids were put into the highest AAP level in order to raise everyone up.
That’s what Shrevewood is doing with the cluster. But it doesn’t work because of the peers. If half the class isn’t ready to do x, then guess what happens…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Received word of a meeting coming up highlighting some proposed changes to "class placement" for next year. Some of the bulleted items include:
1. Additional classroom for student receiving Level IV services (i.e. a 2nd AAP classroom)
2. Teachers 3-6th provide Level IV curriculum to ALL (yes, it was capitalized)
3. Specific differentiation to groups
the Why? Access and Opportunity to ALL students (again, capitalized)
Our school is local level IV and our child is already in AAP, so it shouldn't affect us. Just wondering if there are other ES's going the same route. I have heard from some parents that there are a multitude of kids designated as "Level III" but the AAP can't accommodate them all (the AART teacher has taken on the load), so maybe that's what's driving it?
It would be really great if they piloted an AAP for all where all kids were put into the highest AAP level in order to raise everyone up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Received word of a meeting coming up highlighting some proposed changes to "class placement" for next year. Some of the bulleted items include:
1. Additional classroom for student receiving Level IV services (i.e. a 2nd AAP classroom)
2. Teachers 3-6th provide Level IV curriculum to ALL (yes, it was capitalized)
3. Specific differentiation to groups
the Why? Access and Opportunity to ALL students (again, capitalized)
Our school is local level IV and our child is already in AAP, so it shouldn't affect us. Just wondering if there are other ES's going the same route. I have heard from some parents that there are a multitude of kids designated as "Level III" but the AAP can't accommodate them all (the AART teacher has taken on the load), so maybe that's what's driving it?
It would be really great if they piloted an AAP for all where all kids were put into the highest AAP level in order to raise everyone up.
Anonymous wrote:Received word of a meeting coming up highlighting some proposed changes to "class placement" for next year. Some of the bulleted items include:
1. Additional classroom for student receiving Level IV services (i.e. a 2nd AAP classroom)
2. Teachers 3-6th provide Level IV curriculum to ALL (yes, it was capitalized)
3. Specific differentiation to groups
the Why? Access and Opportunity to ALL students (again, capitalized)
Our school is local level IV and our child is already in AAP, so it shouldn't affect us. Just wondering if there are other ES's going the same route. I have heard from some parents that there are a multitude of kids designated as "Level III" but the AAP can't accommodate them all (the AART teacher has taken on the load), so maybe that's what's driving it?
Anonymous wrote:I am from one of the original schools mentioned. I support he cluster model and think it is the way of the future. But, Shrevewood did not roll it out correctly. Maybe they should have started the change with one grade per year. The teachers have put in amazing work, the admin doesn't seem to understand what they are asking of the teachers. And they don't seem to care that they will be losing students AND teachers next year.
Long story short... my kid is headed to the center next year. I will miss the school, the teachers, and the community. But the move to the center school is right for my child now. Hopefully, in 10 years there is a clear "right way" to roll out the program and it will be the norm. I never thought I would send my kid to the center... but here I am.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am from one of the original schools mentioned. I support he cluster model and think it is the way of the future. But, Shrevewood did not roll it out correctly. Maybe they should have started the change with one grade per year. The teachers have put in amazing work, the admin doesn't seem to understand what they are asking of the teachers. And they don't seem to care that they will be losing students AND teachers next year.
Long story short... my kid is headed to the center next year. I will miss the school, the teachers, and the community. But the move to the center school is right for my child now. Hopefully, in 10 years there is a clear "right way" to roll out the program and it will be the norm. I never thought I would send my kid to the center... but here I am.
Cluster model won’t work at Shrevewood without over burdening the teachers and asking the level Iv kids to teach themselves. My child is in level iv and has complained of their peer group in the classroom. Whereas in years past (pandemic included), they felt challenged by the peer group.
Anonymous wrote:I am from one of the original schools mentioned. I support he cluster model and think it is the way of the future. But, Shrevewood did not roll it out correctly. Maybe they should have started the change with one grade per year. The teachers have put in amazing work, the admin doesn't seem to understand what they are asking of the teachers. And they don't seem to care that they will be losing students AND teachers next year.
Long story short... my kid is headed to the center next year. I will miss the school, the teachers, and the community. But the move to the center school is right for my child now. Hopefully, in 10 years there is a clear "right way" to roll out the program and it will be the norm. I never thought I would send my kid to the center... but here I am.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am from one of the original schools mentioned. I support he cluster model and think it is the way of the future. But, Shrevewood did not roll it out correctly. Maybe they should have started the change with one grade per year. The teachers have put in amazing work, the admin doesn't seem to understand what they are asking of the teachers. And they don't seem to care that they will be losing students AND teachers next year.
Long story short... my kid is headed to the center next year. I will miss the school, the teachers, and the community. But the move to the center school is right for my child now. Hopefully, in 10 years there is a clear "right way" to roll out the program and it will be the norm. I never thought I would send my kid to the center... but here I am.
Shrevewood rolled it out correctly. This is it; overworked teachers, unhappy parents, and underserved students. The best of all possible worlds.
Anonymous wrote:I am from one of the original schools mentioned. I support he cluster model and think it is the way of the future. But, Shrevewood did not roll it out correctly. Maybe they should have started the change with one grade per year. The teachers have put in amazing work, the admin doesn't seem to understand what they are asking of the teachers. And they don't seem to care that they will be losing students AND teachers next year.
Long story short... my kid is headed to the center next year. I will miss the school, the teachers, and the community. But the move to the center school is right for my child now. Hopefully, in 10 years there is a clear "right way" to roll out the program and it will be the norm. I never thought I would send my kid to the center... but here I am.