Anonymous wrote:This is a poor child who is sick (and we don't know with what), and the teacher is presumably vaccinated, but all he's concerned about is the tiny potential threat the child poses. There's not really any concern for the child being expressed here at all. And I am really concerned that this is how this thread will end up.
Tiny potential threat? We are in the upside down world.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Whatever. Identical situation at my Ward 3 elementary, and needless to say, it's not the kind of parent problem, or the kind of parent that CPS will get near.
Same poster, and it certainly is a DCPS problem. DCPS promised symptomatic testing. DCPS is not testing the tweet child, after placing that child in a - covid isolation room - two consecutive days.
this kind of rumor-spreading targeting individually identifiable children is *exactly* why some of us were asking for this thread to be deleted or closely moderated. what do you want, to go to the school and throw the kid out based on a rumor he’s sick and hasn’t been tested? this vigilantism is why DCPS is careful about how it releases data. if you need to know the identity of every kid with the sniffles to feel safe, homeschool.
I am closely monitoring this thread so I am a little surprised by this response. What "individually identifiable" information has been posted about a child?
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Whatever. Identical situation at my Ward 3 elementary, and needless to say, it's not the kind of parent problem, or the kind of parent that CPS will get near.
Same poster, and it certainly is a DCPS problem. DCPS promised symptomatic testing. DCPS is not testing the tweet child, after placing that child in a - covid isolation room - two consecutive days.
this kind of rumor-spreading targeting individually identifiable children is *exactly* why some of us were asking for this thread to be deleted or closely moderated. what do you want, to go to the school and throw the kid out based on a rumor he’s sick and hasn’t been tested? this vigilantism is why DCPS is careful about how it releases data. if you need to know the identity of every kid with the sniffles to feel safe, homeschool.
I am closely monitoring this thread so I am a little surprised by this response. What "individually identifiable" information has been posted about a child?
This is a poor child who is sick (and we don't know with what), and the teacher is presumably vaccinated, but all he's concerned about is the tiny potential threat the child poses. There's not really any concern for the child being expressed here at all. And I am really concerned that this is how this thread will end up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Whatever. Identical situation at my Ward 3 elementary, and needless to say, it's not the kind of parent problem, or the kind of parent that CPS will get near.
Same poster, and it certainly is a DCPS problem. DCPS promised symptomatic testing. DCPS is not testing the tweet child, after placing that child in a - covid isolation room - two consecutive days.
this kind of rumor-spreading targeting individually identifiable children is *exactly* why some of us were asking for this thread to be deleted or closely moderated. what do you want, to go to the school and throw the kid out based on a rumor he’s sick and hasn’t been tested? this vigilantism is why DCPS is careful about how it releases data. if you need to know the identity of every kid with the sniffles to feel safe, homeschool.
+1 and let's not forget how OUT OF CONTROL it got last week on a different thread. People were talking about a specific child's activities in great detail. Doing this on an anonymous message board is just asking for things to get out of control and icky.
If this teacher's story is true, he's already giving out a lot of information out about an innocent child, and also made it really clear how mad he is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Whatever. Identical situation at my Ward 3 elementary, and needless to say, it's not the kind of parent problem, or the kind of parent that CPS will get near.
Same poster, and it certainly is a DCPS problem. DCPS promised symptomatic testing. DCPS is not testing the tweet child, after placing that child in a - covid isolation room - two consecutive days.
this kind of rumor-spreading targeting individually identifiable children is *exactly* why some of us were asking for this thread to be deleted or closely moderated. what do you want, to go to the school and throw the kid out based on a rumor he’s sick and hasn’t been tested? this vigilantism is why DCPS is careful about how it releases data. if you need to know the identity of every kid with the sniffles to feel safe, homeschool.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Whatever. Identical situation at my Ward 3 elementary, and needless to say, it's not the kind of parent problem, or the kind of parent that CPS will get near.
Same poster, and it certainly is a DCPS problem. DCPS promised symptomatic testing. DCPS is not testing the tweet child, after placing that child in a - covid isolation room - two consecutive days.
this kind of rumor-spreading targeting individually identifiable children is *exactly* why some of us were asking for this thread to be deleted or closely moderated. what do you want, to go to the school and throw the kid out based on a rumor he’s sick and hasn’t been tested? this vigilantism is why DCPS is careful about how it releases data. if you need to know the identity of every kid with the sniffles to feel safe, homeschool.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Whatever. Identical situation at my Ward 3 elementary, and needless to say, it's not the kind of parent problem, or the kind of parent that CPS will get near.
Same poster, and it certainly is a DCPS problem. DCPS promised symptomatic testing. DCPS is not testing the tweet child, after placing that child in a - covid isolation room - two consecutive days.
Anonymous wrote:
I'm so glad that poor child has somewhere to sleep. I wonder what his home life is like that he returned to school even though he was sick -- I bet his parents don't have other options for childcare and may not have had a choice but to go to school today. I also hope he doesn't have Covid -- maybe the school should just give him a test?
I see these anecdotes and the people tweeting them and sharing them all seem to think this is evidence schools should be closed, but to me it's just further evidence that we desperately need support structure in place for families. Imagine seeing a sick child and just feeling angry that schools are open, instead of thinking "what can I do to help this kid?" Presumably the tweeter is vaccinated so the threat to him, personally posed by this child is small. And he is in an isolation room where presumably only other vaccinated adults in masks are interacting with him. Sound like a tough situation but it does not make me think the Covid protections at the school have failed (to the contrary, many of them are working, though the child should not have returned to school). It makes me think we as a society are failing children, starting with an educator who'd rather tweet about a sick child than do something to help him.
Anonymous wrote:
That’s not a DCPS problem. It’s a parent problem. And one that CPS should and probably will address.
Anonymous wrote:
I'm so glad that poor child has somewhere to sleep. I wonder what his home life is like that he returned to school even though he was sick -- I bet his parents don't have other options for childcare and may not have had a choice but to go to school today. I also hope he doesn't have Covid -- maybe the school should just give him a test?
I see these anecdotes and the people tweeting them and sharing them all seem to think this is evidence schools should be closed, but to me it's just further evidence that we desperately need support structure in place for families. Imagine seeing a sick child and just feeling angry that schools are open, instead of thinking "what can I do to help this kid?" Presumably the tweeter is vaccinated so the threat to him, personally posed by this child is small. And he is in an isolation room where presumably only other vaccinated adults in masks are interacting with him. Sound like a tough situation but it does not make me think the Covid protections at the school have failed (to the contrary, many of them are working, though the child should not have returned to school). It makes me think we as a society are failing children, starting with an educator who'd rather tweet about a sick child than do something to help him.
Anonymous wrote:
Whatever. Identical situation at my Ward 3 elementary, and needless to say, it's not the kind of parent problem, or the kind of parent that CPS will get near.