Anonymous wrote:It the accuser was 12 and it happened 56 years ago she is now 68. I think there is a statue of limitations for a reason.

Np but why should there be? If he had murdered someone than they dont say " statue if limitations". They prosecute. Rape is a serious offense that should not have a " staue of limitations"

My daughter is 12 and looks like a young woman. I have no trouble believing this. Sick.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i do not believe a word of this.

Why would she make it up? Maybe she just now found the courage to come forward. Why would she blow her life up for no reason?

$$$

That is a direct quote from this board defending Ford against Kavanough. There are pages after that defending Ford, yet you think it's different this time, why?

Not PP, but Ford came forward because her assailant was about to become a Supreme Court justice.

So for Bob Dylan, for an incident from 56 years ago, I think it’s reasonable to ask…why now?

Anonymous wrote:Believe all women!!

You obviously didn’t follow the Duke lacrosse story. They got paid millions from Duke because accuser made it all up

A lot of sordid sh*t went down with all these 60s musicians, so it wouldn't shock me if it were true. But in a practical sense, I don't know how she could prove it at this point.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe this. The values were so different back then. Roman Polanski, Elvis Presley, David Bowie, and so many rock stars and famous folks had sex with minors. It's not ok but it was more socially accept able back then. 🤮

The values were different for sure. Makes no sense to apply today's values for something that maybe(!) happened half of a century ago.

(Some American values still don't apply in Europe and they probably never will).

It was not socially acceptable for grown adults to have sex with 12 year olds in 1965. Remember when Jerry Lee Lewis married his 13 year old cousin? That was in the 50s and it was a huge scandal.

Anonymous wrote:I believe this. The values were so different back then. Roman Polanski, Elvis Presley, David Bowie, and so many rock stars and famous folks had sex with minors. It's not ok but it was more socially accept able back then. 🤮

The values were different for sure. Makes no sense to apply today's values for something that maybe(!) happened half of a century ago.

(Some American values still don't apply in Europe and they probably never will).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i do not believe a word of this.

Why would she make it up? Maybe she just now found the courage to come forward. Why would she blow her life up for no reason?

$$$

That is a direct quote from this board defending Ford against Kavanough. There are pages after that defending Ford, yet you think it's different this time, why?

NP. I’m inclined to believe this accuser, just as I believed Ford. However, these are very, very different circumstances. The standard for convicting someone in a court of law is far higher than the standard for declining to confirm a Supreme Court nominee, as it should be. Also, Ford was taking a much bigger risk in coming forward than this accuser is.

Anonymous wrote:Believe all women!!

Please.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i do not believe a word of this.

Why would she make it up? Maybe she just now found the courage to come forward. Why would she blow her life up for no reason?

How in the world would a 12 year old KNOW it was Bob Dylan?

What does that even mean? Twelve-year-olds aren't two-year-olds.

Anonymous wrote:I believe this. The values were so different back then. Roman Polanski, Elvis Presley, David Bowie, and so many rock stars and famous folks had sex with minors. It's not ok but it was more socially accept able back then. 🤮

Why do you believe? Just curious

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ridiculous. Unless there is EVIDENCE then IMO after this many years this should be treated as slander.

What EVIDENCE do you need? Do we not believe all Women?

Who is this “we” you are speaking of? You are writing from the POV that individuals cannot form their own opinions.

Anonymous wrote:Ridiculous. Unless there is EVIDENCE then IMO after this many years this should be treated as slander.

What EVIDENCE do you need? Do we not believe all Women?

Others will come forward. Cosby Part II...

Ridiculous. Unless there is EVIDENCE then IMO after this many years this should be treated as slander.