Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why ask Why? Just enjoy the game. LOL
Asking Why is intellectually good for you.
Fine. So tell me how once you know why Latin countries are good at soccer will make your DC better at soccer?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you're dumb. Just dumb.
Whoever posted that map, you're also dumb. It leaves out Romania, which is just as "Latin" as Mexico, apparently.
The "Messi got Spanish citizenship so that PROVES a Latin commonality" ??? Beyond dumb. Show up to a country with that kind of talent and stay there long enough, you'll get a passport too.
There is particular style of football common to countries that speak Romance languages. If you watch Italy play Spain and think that they're the same, what can I say? You're dumb.
Messi has Spanish ancestry. The Spanish are Latin people. Messi is the #1 soccer player in the world. I am by no means a fan of his though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know why the Central American countries suck so bad ? It’s claimed to be there their culture as well.
Because they have relatively small populations compared to Brazil, France, Germany, etc... and because they're relatively poor and don't invest heavily in coaches and the infrastructure required to be soccer powerhouses.
The Economist has a nice article about what makes a country good at "football". They found that, unsurprisingly, wealth, country size, and interest are highly predictive of a country's success. Some of the overachievers by this measure are Uruguay and the Netherlands. One of the biggest underachievers is the USA.
By the way, Spain, Italy and France might speak romance or latin-based languages, but they play very different soccer from each other and from countries in Latin America.
The origin of a language doesn’t translate to soccer styles.
Exactly which is why OP is dumb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why ask Why? Just enjoy the game. LOL
Asking Why is intellectually good for you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know why the Central American countries suck so bad ? It’s claimed to be there their culture as well.
Because they have relatively small populations compared to Brazil, France, Germany, etc... and because they're relatively poor and don't invest heavily in coaches and the infrastructure required to be soccer powerhouses.
The Economist has a nice article about what makes a country good at "football". They found that, unsurprisingly, wealth, country size, and interest are highly predictive of a country's success. Some of the overachievers by this measure are Uruguay and the Netherlands. One of the biggest underachievers is the USA.
By the way, Spain, Italy and France might speak romance or latin-based languages, but they play very different soccer from each other and from countries in Latin America.
The origin of a language doesn’t translate to soccer styles.
Anonymous wrote:Why ask Why? Just enjoy the game. LOL
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know why the Central American countries suck so bad ? It’s claimed to be there their culture as well.
Because they have relatively small populations compared to Brazil, France, Germany, etc... and because they're relatively poor and don't invest heavily in coaches and the infrastructure required to be soccer powerhouses.
The Economist has a nice article about what makes a country good at "football". They found that, unsurprisingly, wealth, country size, and interest are highly predictive of a country's success. Some of the overachievers by this measure are Uruguay and the Netherlands. One of the biggest underachievers is the USA.
By the way, Spain, Italy and France might speak romance or latin-based languages, but they play very different soccer from each other and from countries in Latin America.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know why the Central American countries suck so bad ? It’s claimed to be there their culture as well.