Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^ and Byron Cross.

I do feel sad that this woman is so gullible as to ruin her career and humiliate herself nationally like this as part of this. She has been manipulated like so many else.

But I am also glad she won’t be teaching children anymore. Let her work at Walmart or something.

Was it really necessary to make that nasty comment about Walmart?

The nasty comment wasn’t about Walmart. It was about her. I was just pointing out that she is forever unemployable now. Except is probably the right-wing bubble or retail.

It was explicitly about Walmart, as evidenced by the word "Walmart." There are many decent, hardworking people trying to make a living there.

And she can be one of them.

Nice try at walk back.

Anonymous wrote:I have kids in LCPS and am anti-CRT (the radical bits), but this strikes me as grandstanding.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^ and Byron Cross.

I do feel sad that this woman is so gullible as to ruin her career and humiliate herself nationally like this as part of this. She has been manipulated like so many else.

But I am also glad she won’t be teaching children anymore. Let her work at Walmart or something.

Was it really necessary to make that nasty comment about Walmart?

The nasty comment wasn’t about Walmart. It was about her. I was just pointing out that she is forever unemployable now. Except is probably the right-wing bubble or retail.

It was explicitly about Walmart, as evidenced by the word "Walmart." There are many decent, hardworking people trying to make a living there.

And she can be one of them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^ and Byron Cross.

I do feel sad that this woman is so gullible as to ruin her career and humiliate herself nationally like this as part of this. She has been manipulated like so many else.

But I am also glad she won’t be teaching children anymore. Let her work at Walmart or something.

She's hot enough that she'll probably end up on Fox News, which I bet was in the back of her mind

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Miss Methodist is proof that many devout church goers have nothing in common with what Jesus taught. They barely even understand the man let alone follow him.

Naw, you are proof of the corruption of Christianity and your bizarre attempts to appropriate the teachings of Jesus to rationalize your bigotry.

You are a terrible human being and will burn in Hell for all eternity.

Because I use kids’ pronouns? Lol ok

Oh no wait I got you mixed up with whoever is saying don’t use them. Ok it’s not you, whoever the Christian is who won’t respect trans kids, you’re the bad one, not the Methodist

Methodist here. I use whatever pronoun kids would ask me to use. Jesus would too. It’s the other bigot claiming to be Christian you appear to have an issue with. Or rather, WE have an issue with.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since CRT is a graduate school level academic subject, no elementary schooler is studying it.

That snark is stale and it won't hunt. Most sentient people reasonably understand that what's being discussed is not CRT as it is taught in-law schools and in higher education, but rather, aspects derived from its principles.

Which isn’t happening, either. Idiot.

Pretty certain that aspects derived from its principles, such as properly emphasizing putting greater attention on racism and it's effects is being woven into the curriculum.

Being “pretty certain” is like being “kind of pregnant.”

Sit down.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since CRT is a graduate school level academic subject, no elementary schooler is studying it.

That snark is stale and it won't hunt. Most sentient people reasonably understand that what's being discussed is not CRT as it is taught in-law schools and in higher education, but rather, aspects derived from its principles.

Which isn’t happening, either. Idiot.

Pretty certain that aspects derived from its principles, such as properly emphasizing putting greater attention on racism and it's effects is being woven into the curriculum.

CRT isn’t any discussion of racism

Kids learning about racism so they don’t be racist is good . The goal is reduce racism yeah?

Anonymous wrote:Good riddance. We don’t need people like her at Byron Cross interacting with our children.

I wonder if she also attends Cornerstone Chapel. They seem to be the common denominator in all of this. Not very Christian.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since CRT is a graduate school level academic subject, no elementary schooler is studying it.

That snark is stale and it won't hunt. Most sentient people reasonably understand that what's being discussed is not CRT as it is taught in-law schools and in higher education, but rather, aspects derived from its principles.

Which isn’t happening, either. Idiot.

Pretty certain that aspects derived from its principles, such as properly emphasizing putting greater attention on racism and it's effects is being woven into the curriculum.

CRT isn’t any discussion of racism

Kids learning about racism so they don’t be racist is good . The goal is reduce racism yeah?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since CRT is a graduate school level academic subject, no elementary schooler is studying it.

That snark is stale and it won't hunt. Most sentient people reasonably understand that what's being discussed is not CRT as it is taught in-law schools and in higher education, but rather, aspects derived from its principles.

Which isn’t happening, either. Idiot.

Pretty certain that aspects derived from its principles, such as properly emphasizing putting greater attention on racism and it's effects is being woven into the curriculum.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^ and Byron Cross.

I do feel sad that this woman is so gullible as to ruin her career and humiliate herself nationally like this as part of this. She has been manipulated like so many else.

But I am also glad she won’t be teaching children anymore. Let her work at Walmart or something.

Was it really necessary to make that nasty comment about Walmart?

The nasty comment wasn’t about Walmart. It was about her. I was just pointing out that she is forever unemployable now. Except is probably the right-wing bubble or retail.

It was explicitly about Walmart, as evidenced by the word "Walmart." There are many decent, hardworking people trying to make a living there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Miss Methodist is proof that many devout church goers have nothing in common with what Jesus taught. They barely even understand the man let alone follow him.

Naw, you are proof of the corruption of Christianity and your bizarre attempts to appropriate the teachings of Jesus to rationalize your bigotry.

You are a terrible human being and will burn in Hell for all eternity.

Because I use kids’ pronouns? Lol ok

Oh no wait I got you mixed up with whoever is saying don’t use them. Ok it’s not you, whoever the Christian is who won’t respect trans kids, you’re the bad one, not the Methodist

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^ and Byron Cross.

I do feel sad that this woman is so gullible as to ruin her career and humiliate herself nationally like this as part of this. She has been manipulated like so many else.

But I am also glad she won’t be teaching children anymore. Let her work at Walmart or something.

Was it really necessary to make that nasty comment about Walmart?

The nasty comment wasn’t about Walmart. It was about her. I was just pointing out that she is forever unemployable now. Except is probably the right-wing bubble or retail.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Since CRT is a graduate school level academic subject, no elementary schooler is studying it.

That snark is stale and it won't hunt. Most sentient people reasonably understand that what's being discussed is not CRT as it is taught in-law schools and in higher education, but rather, aspects derived from its principles.

Which isn’t happening, either. Idiot.

Pretty certain that aspects derived from its principles, such as properly emphasizing putting greater attention on racism and it's effects is being woven into the curriculum.