Anonymous wrote:She really did run a top notch primary campaign, contrary to widespread opinion. And, she’s been superb in her role as vp, rising to the occasion and tackling some of the most pressing problems with aplomb. I have the utmost faith in Biden—he chose her for a reason. Zero need to panic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one has explained why they think the VP is, as PP put it, "close to the bottom of the bottom feeders." No one is perfect.

Publicly endorsing socialism the day before the election might be a start.

"Socialism" like medicare and interstate highways?

https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/1322963321994289154?s=19

Ah yes. Everyone knows that pointing out the difference between equity and equality is the first step toward nationalizing Amazon.

Imagine seeing a 45 second short animation saying "hey, maybe people who need more help should get more help." and somehow believing that means the person sharing it is advocating for transfer of the ownership of the means of production to the people.

The greatest trick the GOP ever pulled was convincing an entire political party that not only does "socialism" mean "anything in which someone gets something that I don't," but also that that is always inherently a bad thing. An entire party of crabs in a bucket.

The problematic part of this video was the part that says "so everybody can end up in the same place." That is socialism, almost by definition.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one has explained why they think the VP is, as PP put it, "close to the bottom of the bottom feeders." No one is perfect.

Publicly endorsing socialism the day before the election might be a start.

"Socialism" like medicare and interstate highways?

https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/1322963321994289154?s=19

Ah yes. Everyone knows that pointing out the difference between equity and equality is the first step toward nationalizing Amazon.

Imagine seeing a 45 second short animation saying "hey, maybe people who need more help should get more help." and somehow believing that means the person sharing it is advocating for transfer of the ownership of the means of production to the people.

The greatest trick the GOP ever pulled was convincing an entire political party that not only does "socialism" mean "anything in which someone gets something that I don't," but also that that is always inherently a bad thing. An entire party of crabs in a bucket.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one has explained why they think the VP is, as PP put it, "close to the bottom of the bottom feeders." No one is perfect.

Publicly endorsing socialism the day before the election might be a start.

"Socialism" like medicare and interstate highways?

https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/1322963321994289154?s=19

Ah yes. Everyone knows that pointing out the difference between equity and equality is the first step toward nationalizing Amazon.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s unimpressive but is a President really going to select a superstar that could steal the limelight? No. He knows she can’t fix the immigration problem but now it’s off his plate and she’s tagged with it. I bet it was his folks that provided the background for the problems in her office a few weeks ago.
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

She wasn't even a serious competitor in the democratic primary. Honestly her credentials are pretty light and the ones she has are problematic IMO but she was selected because of her demographics and the fact that she is pretty/photogenic. Americans are pretty shallow when it comes to voting for politicians.

She’s photogenic but not pretty irl.

It’s shocking how short and stumpy she and klobuchar are.

If she was as dark as Stacey Abrams, she’d never be where she is.


Weird post.

I've never seen her in real life but the bolded is 100% true unfortunately. I hope as a country we can get past the racism and colorism that plagues us. I would have liked to see more from Val Demings as a VP candidate but I figured it wouldn't happen this time around for just that reason.

Val demmings would’ve been an amazing vp choice.

She’s a lot more relatable to purple states…..I would have no issues scheduling her to come to PA IMO if I was running a campaign for a pa statewide candidate as it is.

If she was latte toned like Susan rice, she’d rocket straight to the top even faster.

Val demings is “normal” in a way kH isn’t.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s unimpressive but is a President really going to select a superstar that could steal the limelight? No. He knows she can’t fix the immigration problem but now it’s off his plate and she’s tagged with it. I bet it was his folks that provided the background for the problems in her office a few weeks ago.
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

She wasn't even a serious competitor in the democratic primary. Honestly her credentials are pretty light and the ones she has are problematic IMO but she was selected because of her demographics and the fact that she is pretty/photogenic. Americans are pretty shallow when it comes to voting for politicians.

She’s photogenic but not pretty irl.

It’s shocking how short and stumpy she and klobuchar are.

If she was as dark as Stacey Abrams, she’d never be where she is.


Weird post.

I've never seen her in real life but the bolded is 100% true unfortunately. I hope as a country we can get past the racism and colorism that plagues us. I would have liked to see more from Val Demings as a VP candidate but I figured it wouldn't happen this time around for just that reason.

Val demmings would’ve been an amazing vp choice.

She’s a lot more relatable to purple states…..I would have no issues scheduling her to come to PA IMO if I was running a campaign for a pa statewide candidate as it is.

If she was latte toned like Susan rice, she’d rocket straight to the top even faster.

Val demings is “normal” in a way kH isn’t.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s unimpressive but is a President really going to select a superstar that could steal the limelight? No. He knows she can’t fix the immigration problem but now it’s off his plate and she’s tagged with it. I bet it was his folks that provided the background for the problems in her office a few weeks ago.
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

She wasn't even a serious competitor in the democratic primary. Honestly her credentials are pretty light and the ones she has are problematic IMO but she was selected because of her demographics and the fact that she is pretty/photogenic. Americans are pretty shallow when it comes to voting for politicians.

She’s photogenic but not pretty irl.

It’s shocking how short and stumpy she and klobuchar are.

If she was as dark as Stacey Abrams, she’d never be where she is.

I've never seen her in real life but the bolded is 100% true unfortunately. I hope as a country we can get past the racism and colorism that plagues us. I would have liked to see more from Val Demings as a VP candidate but I figured it wouldn't happen this time around for just that reason.

Anonymous wrote:The GOP will continue to trash her, the same way they trashed the Clintons, Newsome and other rising Dems.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I LOVE VP Harris!

- late 50s white lady from “flyover country”

What does your race, gender, or age have to do with it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one has explained why they think the VP is, as PP put it, "close to the bottom of the bottom feeders." No one is perfect.

Publicly endorsing socialism the day before the election might be a start.

"Socialism" like medicare and interstate highways?

https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/1322963321994289154?s=19

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s unimpressive but is a President really going to select a superstar that could steal the limelight? No. He knows she can’t fix the immigration problem but now it’s off his plate and she’s tagged with it. I bet it was his folks that provided the background for the problems in her office a few weeks ago.
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

She wasn't even a serious competitor in the democratic primary. Honestly her credentials are pretty light and the ones she has are problematic IMO but she was selected because of her demographics and the fact that she is pretty/photogenic. Americans are pretty shallow when it comes to voting for politicians.

She’s photogenic but not pretty irl.

It’s shocking how short and stumpy she and klobuchar are.

If she was as dark as Stacey Abrams, she’d never be where she is.

I've never seen her in real life but the bolded is 100% true unfortunately. I hope as a country we can get past the racism and colorism that plagues us. I would have liked to see more from Val Demings as a VP candidate but I figured it wouldn't happen this time around for just that reason.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one has explained why they think the VP is, as PP put it, "close to the bottom of the bottom feeders." No one is perfect.

Publicly endorsing socialism the day before the election might be a start.

"Socialism" like medicare and interstate highways?