Anonymous wrote:I watched a private lesson at our pool this week that was terrible. 16/17yo lifeguards do not automatically make good teachers. The kid literally learned nothing new the whole 30 mins I watched. OP I would bribe for active participation. Maybe if he does 4 lessons a week (one day of as a compromise) he gets an ice cream on slushie or something on Friday. Give him some control over which day he wants off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid got so much more out of 1 on 1 lessons with an amazing instructor (who also coaches special olympics) than a class.
I know but the classes really are good. And they build team community. Plus they’re basically included with the pool membership. I’m really hesitant to pay extra for this.
Why did you ask for advice if every time an experienced parent gives it to you, you just repeat endlessly "but this class is AMAZING and it's FREE?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid got so much more out of 1 on 1 lessons with an amazing instructor (who also coaches special olympics) than a class.
I know but the classes really are good. And they build team community. Plus they’re basically included with the pool membership. I’m really hesitant to pay extra for this.
Anonymous wrote:I say this with a smile (in all seriousness, not meant to be snarky), but I think we can all see where OP’s son gets his stubbornness. She asked for advice, but if it doesn’t fit bribe/consequence, she’s just not interested, despite the consensus that 1:1 is the way to go, lol.
Anonymous wrote:
Honestly, do this the right way. Find a good one on one instructor.
I know you think your kid has a "great foundation' but actually getting from "he can sort of swim with floaties" to "he can swim confidently" is the hardest step because it requires confidence in addition to a lot of focus and awareness of what you're doing.
A lot of times this is really, really hard to accomplish in a class setting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does he actually know how to swim? I.e can he get in pool and get around without floaties? If so I would back off. If not I would say he has to take lessons until he reaches a milestone that lets him swim on his own.
He has a fantastic foundation from just a few lessons before he quit and can sort of swim. But no, he needs supervision and floaties.
No child needs floaties. He needs a parent in the water with him at that age either way, and floaties will just hinder the swimming.
People eventually need to know how to swim. 4 year olds do not need formal lessons. I wouldn't have this power struggle with a 4 year old.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you be in the pool with him during the class? Maybe doing what they’re doing in a different section?
Just pay for one on one.
But I think it’s weird that you are punishing him by making him sit with you rather than getting in the pool with him during the class and trying to help him learn in another area of the pool. Making him sit out will make him even more stubborn and hating of the pool.
I have a new baby. The pool is awesome because it basically includes 45 minutes of swim instruction every morning. We have done group classes in the past. This is totally different and much better. I simply don’t have the luxury to swim with him, especially when lessons are offered.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can you be in the pool with him during the class? Maybe doing what they’re doing in a different section?
Just pay for one on one.
But I think it’s weird that you are punishing him by making him sit with you rather than getting in the pool with him during the class and trying to help him learn in another area of the pool. Making him sit out will make him even more stubborn and hating of the pool.
Anonymous wrote:Can you be in the pool with him during the class? Maybe doing what they’re doing in a different section?