Anonymous wrote:Lady, you have posted multiple threads here. Posted in the private school forum. Posted on AEM. You’re going to have to make your own decision.
Anonymous wrote:I love Oakridge. It’s a sweet little school. Great teachers, wonderful Principal. No homework except reading, which I love.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still don’t know of any private schools that have licensed teachers on staff. These things matter, y’all…
I’ve known many licensed teachers who have left public for private.
I’m sure. Everyone is falling all over themselves to blow sunshine up your dress for less money.
You clearly have no experience with private schools. Many of the teachers are indeed licensed. Private teaching is different from public and there are draws (like having more freedom to tailor curriculum to student needs/personalities, smaller class sizes, and less testing). I teach in FCPS, my kids go to APS, and my husband is a high earner. I’ve taught in private before and after this hellish year, have definitely considered switching back.
In anycase..to OP, I think this question is really hard to answer because it is hugely personal. In the grand scheme of public schools, these are two fantastic options. They are still public schools, however, and will have a different feel from somewhere like Burgundy or ACDS (and between those two, huge differences as well). Only you can answer this question for your family.
You are misleading people, and you know it. What a bunch of malarkey. We not only have the “freedom” to meet individual student needs, but we are required to. Are you not doing that in FCPS? Private school teachers are rarely highly qualified, unless, I guess as you put it, they have wealthy spouses. They have to cater to individual parent whims, as their meager salaries depend on it. I taught in private, too- before I finished getting my license and got my APS job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still don’t know of any private schools that have licensed teachers on staff. These things matter, y’all…
I’ve known many licensed teachers who have left public for private.
I’m sure. Everyone is falling all over themselves to blow sunshine up your dress for less money.
You clearly have no experience with private schools. Many of the teachers are indeed licensed. Private teaching is different from public and there are draws (like having more freedom to tailor curriculum to student needs/personalities, smaller class sizes, and less testing). I teach in FCPS, my kids go to APS, and my husband is a high earner. I’ve taught in private before and after this hellish year, have definitely considered switching back.
In anycase..to OP, I think this question is really hard to answer because it is hugely personal. In the grand scheme of public schools, these are two fantastic options. They are still public schools, however, and will have a different feel from somewhere like Burgundy or ACDS (and between those two, huge differences as well). Only you can answer this question for your family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still don’t know of any private schools that have licensed teachers on staff. These things matter, y’all…
I’ve known many licensed teachers who have left public for private.
I’m sure. Everyone is falling all over themselves to blow sunshine up your dress for less money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still don’t know of any private schools that have licensed teachers on staff. These things matter, y’all…
Do they? I'm a public school parent, and we have had some shockingly bad teachers (and even worse administrators) in APS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Still don’t know of any private schools that have licensed teachers on staff. These things matter, y’all…
I’ve known many licensed teachers who have left public for private.
If they got a break on their children’s tuition, I could see it. Otherwise, I cannot imagine why anyone would. Public school teachers are paid fairly, at best. Private school teachers are very poorly compensated.