Anonymous wrote:I wear a 2 or a 4, and I can understand OP's quandary. As much as DCUMers seem to think the fashion industry is made for thin women, it's actually hard to find small sizes in most stores. Yes, garments are CUT for models, but most stores stock a large number of 6, 8, and 10s -- the middle sizes. There's nothing wrong with catering to these sizes, since that's what most women are. But it's frustrating to see a cute outfit and go through a rack of them and not find any in your size -- as frustrating as it would be for a very large woman.
OP, I recommend Forever 21 and Talbots. Talbot has not suffered from size inflation as much as other places, and Forever 21 is cut on a junior model.
Anonymous wrote:21:48, this is OP. What on earth are you talking about? Your post makes no sense, but thanks anyway.
Anonymous wrote:5'8 and 103?? gross
Anonymous wrote:OP here; I had luck in Theory and also in England at both Jigsaw and LK Bennett. Just throwing that out in case any of you thin people are over there and shopping...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:European designers. They have not had the size inflation we have. Armani Exchange for one, still cuts true to size. You missed the January sales but it might be worth running over to London for the weekend for just this reason. Also try Les Copains, Chanel, etc . Theory also seems to run a little smaller as someone else pointed out, and possibly Elie Tahari.
In my pre-kids and (particularly) pre-post 40s metabolism slow down I had exactly your problem. Now, I'm 5'4" and 120-125 lbs and wear a size 2 in most American designers. Yeah, right... In London I am at least a 10.
Gimme a break.
Hey, London Troll -
I'm 5'7" and weigh 125. I'm a 6 or an 8. So how are you a 2 - even by our "American" standards?