Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agreed. The risk to young kids seems to be so, so low -- lower than flu. It makes me sad to think of these young kids in masks for another year for no reason. It's not reasonable.
The risk is not lower than flu. Get off Facebook.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would be furious if virtual was no longer offered and masks were not required in the fall.
Except virtual is for sure going to be offered, it's just that you will need a valid reason for selecting it (like an immunocompromised kid). And it will be through a centralized set-up instead of your kids regular teacher. Which is how it should be.
Imagine if you were given no viable option for getting your kid an education. Like if the only option you were offered was virtual, for a year and a half, and your kid has a sensory processing disorder that make it hard for him to wear a mask AND hard to learn virtually, and everyone just kind of shrugged their shoulders at you for months and months because you are still waiting for your IEP to be approved and you had to go part time at your job to take over his education and every day you just died a little more inside.
Would that make you furious?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agreed. The risk to young kids seems to be so, so low -- lower than flu. It makes me sad to think of these young kids in masks for another year for no reason. It's not reasonable.
The risk is not lower than flu. Get off Facebook.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would be furious if virtual was no longer offered and masks were not required in the fall.
Except virtual is for sure going to be offered, it's just that you will need a valid reason for selecting it (like an immunocompromised kid). And it will be through a centralized set-up instead of your kids regular teacher. Which is how it should be.
Imagine if you were given no viable option for getting your kid an education. Like if the only option you were offered was virtual, for a year and a half, and your kid has a sensory processing disorder that make it hard for him to wear a mask AND hard to learn virtually, and everyone just kind of shrugged their shoulders at you for months and months because you are still waiting for your IEP to be approved and you had to go part time at your job to take over his education and every day you just died a little more inside.
Would that make you furious?
OH the same thing would have happened if your child had an IEP in place.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the rationale for dropping masks indoors since they are not vaccinated? I agree, no masks outdoors though.
Because they are uncomfortable, interfere with teaching, and uneccesary when there’s extremely low community spread.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would be furious if virtual was no longer offered and masks were not required in the fall.
Except virtual is for sure going to be offered, it's just that you will need a valid reason for selecting it (like an immunocompromised kid). And it will be through a centralized set-up instead of your kids regular teacher. Which is how it should be.
Imagine if you were given no viable option for getting your kid an education. Like if the only option you were offered was virtual, for a year and a half, and your kid has a sensory processing disorder that make it hard for him to wear a mask AND hard to learn virtually, and everyone just kind of shrugged their shoulders at you for months and months because you are still waiting for your IEP to be approved and you had to go part time at your job to take over his education and every day you just died a little more inside.
Would that make you furious?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with PP, they may still change it. Easier to dial back.
I do hope people vaccinate children. It will help reduce the chance of circulating variants in the winter.
You understand the odds of a vaccine being approved for young children before winter is basically nil, right? Maybe older elementary kids. But there is virtually no way that ECE or 1st-2nd grade kids will be able to get a vaccine in 2021, and the odds for 2022 aren't even that great.
But if 80% of adults and older kids are vaccinated, it likely won't matter. Which is one of the reasons the vaccine is likely to be approved -- it will seem to unnecessarily risky to use a relatively new vaccine on small children against a virus that exists only in very small numbers, if at all, and poses a limited risk to them. This isn't polio. All the cost/benefits of Covid are reversed from what they were during the polio crisis.
Anonymous wrote:I agree with PP, they may still change it. Easier to dial back.
I do hope people vaccinate children. It will help reduce the chance of circulating variants in the winter.
Anonymous wrote:I would be furious if virtual was no longer offered and masks were not required in the fall.
Anonymous wrote:I would be furious if virtual was no longer offered and masks were not required in the fall.