Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah a “private” kitchen makes me think of my grandmother who slaved away in one all day for holiday meals while the rest of us hung out or came and went and then after dinner the women would go in and help her with the dishes and the men would adjourn to the living room.
Ugh.
There is a big difference between a "private" kitchen (which sounds nice to me because I'm an introvert) and a kitchen that isn't visible from your front door. But the current trend in new builds is to have two kitchens: a big showpiece kitchen for entertaining, and a private one for actual cooking. Because people have realized that a kitchen doesn't look like a magazine when you actually use it, and maybe our ancestors weren't so stupid after all.
This is so stupid and wasteful.
The people doing this have $$$$. But what's more stupid and wasteful is tearing down walls in your 2000 SF house, making your home less functional because you saw it in a magazine.
How does tearing down a wall make a house less functional? Seriously. Explain. And remember, I want to hear what functions the wall is responsible for.
Anonymous wrote:When we added a kitchen to our small rambler, I let the architect and my husband talk me into a design where you see the entire kitchen from the front door. I hate it. No.privacy, always looks messy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Removing a kitchen wall might look good on TV but it doesn't live well. If you remove walls you are very limited with your furniture placement. Plus walls are ideal for privacy, sound control, etc. Don't fall for this fad.
This makes no sense. If you think furniture placement is a function of putting things against walls then you don't know anything about design.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah a “private” kitchen makes me think of my grandmother who slaved away in one all day for holiday meals while the rest of us hung out or came and went and then after dinner the women would go in and help her with the dishes and the men would adjourn to the living room.
Ugh.
There is a big difference between a "private" kitchen (which sounds nice to me because I'm an introvert) and a kitchen that isn't visible from your front door. But the current trend in new builds is to have two kitchens: a big showpiece kitchen for entertaining, and a private one for actual cooking. Because people have realized that a kitchen doesn't look like a magazine when you actually use it, and maybe our ancestors weren't so stupid after all.
This is so stupid and wasteful.
The people doing this have $$$$. But what's more stupid and wasteful is tearing down walls in your 2000 SF house, making your home less functional because you saw it in a magazine.
How does tearing down a wall make a house less functional? Seriously. Explain. And remember, I want to hear what functions the wall is responsible for.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah a “private” kitchen makes me think of my grandmother who slaved away in one all day for holiday meals while the rest of us hung out or came and went and then after dinner the women would go in and help her with the dishes and the men would adjourn to the living room.
Ugh.
There is a big difference between a "private" kitchen (which sounds nice to me because I'm an introvert) and a kitchen that isn't visible from your front door. But the current trend in new builds is to have two kitchens: a big showpiece kitchen for entertaining, and a private one for actual cooking. Because people have realized that a kitchen doesn't look like a magazine when you actually use it, and maybe our ancestors weren't so stupid after all.
This is so stupid and wasteful.
The people doing this have $$$$. But what's more stupid and wasteful is tearing down walls in your 2000 SF house, making your home less functional because you saw it in a magazine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah a “private” kitchen makes me think of my grandmother who slaved away in one all day for holiday meals while the rest of us hung out or came and went and then after dinner the women would go in and help her with the dishes and the men would adjourn to the living room.
Ugh.
There is a big difference between a "private" kitchen (which sounds nice to me because I'm an introvert) and a kitchen that isn't visible from your front door. But the current trend in new builds is to have two kitchens: a big showpiece kitchen for entertaining, and a private one for actual cooking. Because people have realized that a kitchen doesn't look like a magazine when you actually use it, and maybe our ancestors weren't so stupid after all.
This is so stupid and wasteful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, it’s weird to walk into a house and directly see the kitchen. I think of kitchens as private rather than public spaces in a home.
I don't think that's a very common belief these days. Kitchens are the showpieces for most homes.
Kitchens can be private spaces that are beautiful just for the residents. I’ve never understood kitchens being the center of parties, which is when they’re likely the most messy and disorganized and should in fact be the most private. And when they’re clean between meals, they not lively spaces.
Anonymous wrote:+ 1
Keep the wall. I have to work so hard to hide the sliver of area in the foyer from which you can see a small part of my kitchen. I hate it.
If I ever build my own house, my kitchen would be in a corner of the house in the back.
Anonymous wrote:Removing a kitchen wall might look good on TV but it doesn't live well. If you remove walls you are very limited with your furniture placement. Plus walls are ideal for privacy, sound control, etc. Don't fall for this fad.